User talk:WVRMad/Archive 1





Wye Valley railway Map
Use Wye Valley Railway for standard or for default collapsed (eg for station pages). Give me a shout if there are any problems. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Great Map!


 * Wye Valley Railway Mad (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi. I did read your message, but I've been preoccupied with other stuff. A word of advice - when someone edits my talk page, it shows up in a big orange stripe. When you edit my user page (which you shouldn't be doing anyway), it doesn't inform me at all other than by watchlist.
 * I may get on to the map soon, maybe not. Like I said, other stuff. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that, I didn't know what to do to get the orange stripe, oh well...


 * WVRMAD •Talk  •Guestbook  08:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Coleford Railway Map
Thanks for the offer Mattbuck, I am not desperately in need of it right now but you are welcome to make it...

Wye Valley Railway Mad (talk) 17:51, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

A word of advice...
Just to say that what you're doing looks fine, in general, but if I could just give you one tip it would be to be a little more informative in your edit summaries. Instead of saying "expanding article", it would be more helpful if you could outline in a few words what changes you've made, and in the same way when you're commenting on talk pages it would be sometimes more helpful to put in the summary something more informative than just "talk". Other than that, your edits are really useful and well considered. Happy editing! Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip.

Wye Valley Railway Mad (talk) 15:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Possible adoption
I'll consider adopting you. To address your first questions, you can set your signature format in Special:Preferences. You seem to already have the basic idea, but I can give further tips. As for the arrows, see Edit_summaries and Edit_summaries. These are auto-generated, so you usually don't have to worry about them. You can always write your own summary instead (or in addition for section editing).

One thing I would like to know is whether you have previously edited Wikipedia with another account. Feel free to contact me at Special:EmailUser/Superm401 if you prefer (you may need to enable email in your preferences). Best, Superm401 - Talk 06:51, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd be glad to adopt you. And I do prefer your newest signature.  In the old one, people might be tempted to mouse-over the smileys to see if they lead somewhere different. Superm401 - Talk 02:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Improving Wye Valley Railway Map
Anytime! I thought the less complicated version worked just as well for both diagrams. Britmax (talk) 11:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:NODRAMA reminder
Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 22:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Page movement
Hi, instead of just copy/pasting pages to a new name, it's better to use the move button, as this keeps the history intact. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:


 * T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
 * WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
 * WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
 * WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
 * WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 02:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day
Hi there, WVRMad! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Template Maps
The maps are great. :) They really contribute to the articles, and I don't see any problems.  Superm401 - Talk 21:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Section with a scroll bar
Hi, WVRMad. It's actually very easy. Just enclose the HTML you want to "windowize" in within the body of a pair of &lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt; tags. You'll then want to define the size of the window, and tell the interpreter that the window shouldn't expand beyond that size, but scroll instead. You can to this by defining the height and overflow properties, as follows.

Let me know if you have any problems. Hope that helps! – ClockworkSoul 04:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Doh, my mistake. When I write as  should have read , with a colon instead of an equals sign. I fixed it above, and on your used page. What do you think? – ClockworkSoul 20:22, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Edit count errors
Hey, WVRMAD. The two issues you saw are unrelated. The error at http://stable.toolserver.org/editcount/ seems to be an error in a servlet that is connecting to the toolserver database. When you click the link, you get a SSL error, because jira.ts.wikimedia.org is using an invalid SSL certificate. They're misidentifying themselves, so Firefox (which I do use) is warning you. I would do the "Add Exception" process (even though Wikimedia should fix this too). Superm401 - Talk 09:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Scott McGann
I'm trying to create a page for Scott McGann and the LaGuardia hoax bomb incident that's been all over the news. What I published was just a first draft -- was I wrong to do this? His story impacted tens of thousands of people; what more should I do to prove notability? --Mike Schiraldi (talk) 19:00, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Scott McGann, continued
So I've now added citations demonstrating his notability. How do I get the speedy-deletion nomination removed? --Mike Schiraldi (talk) 19:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Scott McGann
Hello WVRMad, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I contested the speedy deletion of Scott McGann - a page you tagged - because: The article makes a credible assertion of notability, sufficient to pass A7. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. NW ( Talk ) 01:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Latin motto
I think the motto is cute, albeit a little (not excessively) obscure. I also can't vouch for the translation, since I don't know Latin. Be bold and submit it. Superm401 - Talk 04:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

User page
Great job! – ClockworkSoul 14:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Omnifone article revisions
Hi WVRMad,

Thanks for your editing suggestions on the Omnifone article. Following your suggestions I have added citations to the article to ensure it is correctly referenced, verifiable and accurate (and therefore encyclopedic). Would it be possible for you to revisit the article and see what you think as we would like it to meet with your approval? Many thanks Tho2009 (talk) 10:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi WVRMad, thanks for coming back to me on the Omnifone article. Can you let me know if any further revisions or improvements are needed now that you're ok with it. I would like to get the remaining multiple issues tag removed. Can you recommend an admin to talk with if you cannot remove the tag?
 * Many thanks Tho2009 (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Perrygrove Railway.xcf
Hey, it looks like File:Perrygrove Railway.xcf was deleted by Feydey. In the future, consider exporting the xcf (Gimp) file as a PNG. See http://docs.gimp.org/2.2/en/export-file-dialog.html for some details. Let me know if I can help with anything else. Superm401 - Talk 20:17, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Hereford, Ross and Gloucester Railway
Hi, we seem to be cross editing on the HRGR article so to avoid confusion I'll work on the missing stations.

Rsloch (talk) 15:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Abce2 | From the top now! Arggggg! 21:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Motto of the Day
Hello I am contacting you because you seem to be active recently in WP:MOTD. There has been a lack of interest lately, and I would greatly appreciate it if you responded to my comments on the MOTD talk page. Cheers. --LAA Fan sign review 03:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Editor review archived
Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarm talk  05:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Severn Bridge railway station.png
Thanks for uploading File:Severn Bridge railway station.png I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

MOTD contributions
This is a general message to get people to contribute as we are running out again so if you could please do. Please also see Wikipedia talk:Motto of the day. Note to anyone who reads this, WP:MOTD/N. Simply south (talk) 15:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Coleford, Monmouth, Usk and Pontypool Railway
What was the rail gauge of the Coleford, Monmouth, Usk and Pontypool Railway? Peter Horn User talk 00:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC))
 * I have not got any published sources saying it was standard gauge from the start but I presume it was standard gauge from its opening becuase:
 * 1) have not found any information implying that the gauge was changed and I am certain it was standard guage towards the end of it's life because I have seen many photos (including these,) that show it being standard gauge.
 * 2) It branched from the Welsh Marches Line which was standard guage from it's construction and met with the Wye Valley Railway and Ross and Monmouth Railway (both standard gauge) at Monmouth and trains could continue onto Chepstow or Ross-on-Wye staying on the same tracks.
 * 3) The railway company built a massive viaduct soon after the line between Pontypool and Monmouth was completed, the viaduct was only wide enough for a single standard guage track.
 * WVRMAD •Talk  •<font face="Iskoola Pota" color="#4682B4">Guestbook  18:07, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. I guess either one of us coulds update the article. Peter Horn User talk 22:07, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

The Great Wikipedia Dramaout
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

End of adoption
You're welcome, and I wish you the greatest success. Feel free to chat any time. Superm401 - Talk 19:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Grange Court Junction.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Grange Court Junction.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. bjh21 (talk) 10:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC) --bjh21 (talk) 10:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Holme Lacy railway station 2.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Holme Lacy railway station 2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. bjh21 (talk) 13:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:NODRAMA/2
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron  32  02:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Busy!
I have not been able to do much editing recently due to a dodgy internet connection, I will hopefully be able to start editing more soon. <font face="Abbey Old Style SF" color="#8B0000">WVRMAD •<font face="Plantagenet Cherokee" color="#2E8B57">Talk  •<font face="Iskoola Pota" color="#4682B4">Guestbook  13:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Under construction!.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Under construction!.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 21:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Is this ok? <font face="Abbey Old Style SF" color="#8B0000">WVRMAD •<font face="Plantagenet Cherokee" color="#2E8B57">Talk  •<font face="Iskoola Pota" color="#4682B4">Guestbook   13:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, much better. Thank you for correcting that.  -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 20:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Tutshill Halt
Re ; I got the "for Beachley" part from -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:20, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks and an invitation
High WVRMad - thanks for the advice about signing edits of Wikipedia entries.

If you feel like spending a day in the real world please come and play trains on my railway some time. There is a footplate waiting for you. Not quite as much fun as riding up the valley from Chepstow to Monmouth, but the best I can offer, and jolly good fun!

Michael Crofts Perrygrove Railway 01594 834991

Here are my four tildes, hope it works (can't really understand it) MKCatPerrygrove (talk) 20:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

MOTD Problem
Please read this when you get a moment. Thanks! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I added links. Let me know what you think, if you have time. I think that they work pretty well, but my opinion may be a bit biased. :) Hi878 (talk) 05:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Another link was added, your opinion would be fantastic. :) Hi878 (talk) 04:51, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Support MOTD
Hello, Motto of the Day is currently running out of mottos and therefore we would appreciate your support in this project. Please suggest new mottos or support for others at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review. If you have any ideas for mottos on a special date or anniversary, or you are interested in what other ones of thdse there are please see Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials. Thank you for your time. Simply south (talk) 22:00, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Have you had "Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean everyone isn't out to get me?" Link to AN/U or CABAL or something. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Kiko4564 (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

DO
I see you have signed up for the last dramaout. Consider notifying 3 good editors of this to encourage more participation. Perhaps saying

I am participating in this. Please consider doing the same! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians 15:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)