User talk:WW2Historian888

September 2015
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Battle of Okinawa, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:21, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Operation Downfall, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes...
You wouldn't know what's right...

September 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Operation Downfall. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 16:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

I was Just indicating you fool
Stupid Jew troutman.

September 2015
Your recent editing history at Operation Downfall shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 17:31, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Favonian (talk) 18:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)