User talk:WWWUser

Blocked
That's enough. I've blocked you for two days. Repeatedly recreating these policy pages and edit warring is disruptive. Sarah 06:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

ok i can agree to leave the declined notice up just as long as another admin will still review my new request.--WWWUser 07:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Unblock
i'd like an admin who wasn't involved in the edit confusion to review this.--WWWUser 07:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * oh so you don't belive in freedom of speech either, AWB Hacked! is designed to allow people who have a life outside of WP (those without 500 mainspace edits yet) to use it, if they vandalize with it well if you would have asked i plan on a restricted list which only admins could access so if user1 misueses it, you block user1 from editing and add him to this protected list, then when is block is up he still can't use AWB hacked, it's just a reverse of awb were you don't have unreal requirements to even use it but rather let any registered user use it then if they misuse it stop that account from using it.--WWWUser 07:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Repeated recreation of deleted pages is grounds for a block. John Reaves (talk) 06:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: See User talk:WWWUser/archive1 for issued warnings. John Reaves (talk) 07:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * check the edits, i wasn't even messing with those since archiving my talk. There was some mis-communication of redirects and stuff without my not knwoing what was going on it seemed to be vandalism to me so i reverted, evetually it got worked out then i arcived my talk and worked on other things then was blocked. WWWUser 07:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: I declined a previous unblock request. Yuser31415 07:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * But youre not an admin, Yuser, and you did nothing to disabuse this editor of that notion after he appealed your "administrative action". Jeffpw 08:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Consider this another review - I see no reason to unblock you. AWB Hacked! is not appropriate at all for use on Wikipedia (if it even exists), and the re-creation of deleted pages is, as noted above, grounds for a block. | Mr. Darcy talk 15:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)