User talk:WWvH

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Alexander Hochberg, you may be blocked from editing. Guy (Help!) 09:29, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Guy (Help!) 13:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

This is primarily to get your attention. You are being reverted by multiple editors and you are not engaging at all with the Wikipedia community. Guy (Help!) 13:23, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Самозваные цензоры! Хорошо, можно отвергнуть спорные (пока) заявления в статье, пока не появятся указания источников, но зачем удалять достоверную информацию, имеющую первоисточники, ссылки на документы?WWvH (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2017 (UTC)WvH


 * Google translate: "Self-styled censors! Well, you can reject controversial (so far) statements in the article, until the sources appear, but why remove reliable information that has primary sources, links to documents?" --Guy Macon (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)


 * My reply: The sources are not reliable. Google Translate: Источники не являются надежными. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)