User talk:W guice/Archive 4

Archive 4

2008-02-18 – March 2010

Danger (Musician) page deletion
You marked this article for deletion on the 9th of October on the grounds that it relates to a non-notable musician. I am afraid I must disagree, Danger has songs charting on iTunes and his remixes are very popular on music blogging sites such as www.hypem.com. I feel this page is useful on the basis that an encyclopaedia should have information that people are looking for, the information on this page is not easily found elsewhere.

Please do not delete
On July 4th you marked http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mystical_Sun for deletion. I assert that Mystical Sun qualifies for a page by charting on the iTunes music charts "Has had a charted hit on any national music chart". The song "Halo" is regularly played on XMRadio "Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network"

I removed the text from the page that you found promotional. If you Google "Mystical Sun" you will find thousands of pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by M-sun (talk • contribs) 22:19, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Halfway, pleased
Hi Tomasz, and thanks for looking over the Curt Smith page. I wanted to let you know that the correct spelling of his album title is in fact "Halfway, pleased" as it's meant to be a phrase, with the word "pleased" in lower-case. There is a song on the album called "Halfway Pleased," which IS meant to have both words capitalized, but without the comma in between. I didn't want to go in on top and revert your changes without explaining to you... but if you could go back and re-fix them, that would be great. Wzzy (talk) 16:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HitchGroovyDecay.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HitchGroovyDecay.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HitchHen.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HitchHen.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HitcockFrogs.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HitcockFrogs.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MetalChurchLight.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MetalChurchLight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MemphisALittle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MemphisALittle.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OzricBecome.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OzricBecome.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:54, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OzricsArbor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OzricsArbor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:55, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PulpMasters.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:PulpMasters.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SLGTMAYSS.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SLGTMAYSS.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ElvisCruelSmile.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ElvisCruelSmile.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done by someone else.  tomasz.  14:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ElPFanDam.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ElPFanDam.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  15:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Take it easy dawg
Stop yelling at ppl -- Y not be working? 16:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXII - March 2008
The March 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot --18:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

WPHH
I have never officially joined any sort of WikiProject, although there are some projects in which I'd probably be the most active member if I did. I'm not convinced of their usefulness - I almost never get responses when I post on their talk boards. I also tagged WP:JAZZ as inactive; both of these are pretty worrisome, because both of these topics are in terrible shape in general on Wiki. How many regular editors in hip-hop (article creators, GA nominators) do you think there are right now? Chubbles (talk) 22:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hah, I've been administering CPR to jazz for almost a month now. I found out that there were something like 300 articles on the German wiki about American and British jazz musicians with no corresponding article here. Maybe halfway done with that. Chubbles (talk) 22:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, I'll take requests for articles on obviously notable hip hop musicians, especially if their pages have been previously deleted. It's one of the toughest genres to legitimate here, not the least of which is the problem of 12-year-olds pasting MySpace bios in as new articles. Chubbles (talk) 22:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MRPBest.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:MRPBest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MJBirdsFlying.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:MJBirdsFlying.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MFEPDoomGrimm.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:MFEPDoomGrimm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PRBeforeDawn.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PRBeforeDawn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  14:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PLostAsIDie.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PLostAsIDie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  15:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PGBurningOrgan.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PGBurningOrgan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  15:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PMGongDownwind.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PMGongDownwind.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  15:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PhilOchsAToast.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PhilOchsAToast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done by someone else.  tomasz.  15:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PTroyChoiceForce.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:PTroyChoiceForce.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Hip hop Project
Hi, I saw your message on the Hip hop WikiProject talk page, and I have decided to join to try to help the project get going again. I haven't made many edits but I have made significant additions to The Chronic, which is now up for a GA nomination, and done some work on the Straight Outta Compton article. I was thinking that maybe we should restart the "list of members" page, as it seems many of the users who are on the page either no longer edit or don't contribute to the project. I was also thinking that maybe we should change the current collaboration, just to get people more eager to help out .What do you think would help the project get going ? Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 18:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Beyond the Ring
Another editor has added the  template to the article Beyond the Ring, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:14, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
 * that's ok, i only cleaned the fucker up pending deletion anyway.  tomasz.  14:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - 1st Coordinators Election
An election has been proposed and has been set up for this project. Description of the roles etc., can be found at WikiProject Novels/Coordinators. If you wish to stand, enter your candidacy before the end of March and ask your questions of anyone already standing at WikiProject Novels/Coordinators/May 2008. Voting will start on the 1st April and close at the end of April. The intention is for the appointments to last from May - November 2008. For other details check out the pages or ask. KevinalewisBot (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Music from the Middle Drift
Instead of just arbitrarily flagging this article for deletion, please assist me in doing what needs to be done to keep it up. Thomas Matthews (talk) 15:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. Would you recommend creating an article for the band to expand on the album article? I have found some articles on the 'net that I can use to source the material, however, I also have printed stuff I can drum up from my records. I'm interested in hearing your thoughts. Thomas Matthews (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

AFD
Glad I avoided owing you a keyboard. ;-) Thanks, re the audio setup.  I recently graduated school and no longer spin professionally (being a grownup sucks, apparently).  I do so miss the club... you spin any?  /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Goldyn Chyld
A few questions: 1) Can you please explain how "sledgehammer-nut interface" applies to me an my ovaries? 2) Can you please provide support for your claim that this unreleased album is notable? Thanks. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 21:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

The Scene Aesthetic
What's really annoying is that you insist on the deletion of this article, but you have taken absolutely no part in the discussion over its deletion. Either fucking participate or just leave it alone. --Crushti (talk) 04:51, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Deaths in 2008
An editor has nominated Deaths in 2008, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Goldyn Chyld
An article that you have been involved in editing, Goldyn Chyld, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Goldyn Chyld. Thank you. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  15:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Westlife Songlist and related articles
Not having a songlist is a personel opinion and even though other bands might not have such a page, that doesn't imply that we can't include a page on wikipedia which lists the songs recorded. The inclusion of the songlist and other discography related articles has enriched the Westlife wiki entry tremendously as compared to months before.

By not including this section and other related articles, you're just restricting yourself to skin deep information. Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of an encyclopedia?

Please reply on the article discussion page in question.--Longyuano (talk) 08:13, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Digi Snacks
Another editor has added the  template to the article Digi Snacks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Nag Nag Nag
Funny funny funny. Bearian (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The combined Cadet Force information in "The King's School" article
Hello. There was a call to discuss this matter in Talk:The King's School, Chester which did not stop the edit-warring. So the article page was protected in order to try to get the interested parties to discuss the issue. Since the call to discuss the matter was made on 28th March, and the page was protected on 5th April, you have yet to make any argument in favour of not including the information in that discussion, but others have advanced arguments in favour of its inclusion. Unless you engage with the discussion, it will be difficult for your position to be sustained, and the material may well be appropriately included which will then reflect badly upon you if you resume removing the material. I'm just sending you this message to make sure you are clear about this. DDStretch   (talk)  11:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:3efJuju.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:3efJuju.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008
The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 08:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BorrowedTunes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BorrowedTunes.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --22:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Done.  tomasz.  15:54, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Hip hop
Hi, I remember talking to you afew months ago about the state of WikiProject Hip hop and I think we should really try to get it going again. Do you think it would be okay to restart the member list ? I understand we'll need to go around and leave a message on everybodies talk page (can't we get a bot or something to do it). I think we should maybe change the collaboration to a Tupac album or something like that, or one that everybody would be willing to contribute to, what do ya think ? - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 18:11, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: FBI Ten Most Wanted
No problem, man. The article keeps getting some vandalism from various IP's, I have thought maybe it should be protected for some time. Vandalism seems not be too heavy yet, though. Reverend X (talk) 16:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Balla (musician)
Please have another look at the references establishing notability for Balla. Balla is manufactured and distributed by SonyBMG in Portugal, as well as having a release on EMI (Guideline 5). He has toured extensively within the country as well as playing at several large music festivals (Guideline 4). He has citations in Diário Digital, Blitz and Jornal de Noticias, the biggest national newspapers and magazines in Portugal (Guideline 1), plus he's broadcast and playlisted on Antena 3, the biggest commercial station in Portugal (Guideline 11). He is actually Armando Teixeira, who already has a wiki citation, but he appears on national charts and press articles as Balla, his alter ego. Finally, he was a former member of Da Weasel, probably the biggest selling hip hop artist in Portugal. Altlusa (talk) 14:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

My Last And Best Album
It seems to be customary with Lowlife releases that when the release date commences the artists usually has an interview with ukhh, leedshiphop, headnob, britishhiphop etc etc As this is possibly Braintaxs last album it is quite odd that he leave without confirming if it is indeed his last album or not, i thought it was quite relevant and interesting to the article. What u think? 167.1.176.4 (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Danny Moss-- thanks
Thanks for doing that article. i didnt know that much about him!--ProperFraction (talk) 02:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Rap
I have started a disscussion on Talk:Hip_hop_music. If you wish to discuss this this people post your opinions.Johan Rachmaninov (talk) 17:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008
The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot  (owner)  05:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Twilight Guardians
Excuse me, but how is a band "non-notable" if they are signed to a major label and have released four CDs???? JazzlineB (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Noise, Noise and More Noise
An article that you have been involved in editing, Noise, Noise and More Noise, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Noise, Noise and More Noise. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Stormie (talk) 12:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary: Hip hop music
See Civility. Hyacinth (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Before you move all of 'em
Hey there. Isn't the phrase "number-one" hyphenated when used as an adjective? i.e. "This album hit number one" (no hyphen). "He has two number-one albums". Right? - eo (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, not a prob.... no need to create a bunch of unnecessary work :-P  - eo (talk) 11:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Two Shoes merger
I agree with your merger proposal put any non-repetitive material from Two Shoes (North American Edition) into Two Shoes then go for it.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:DEATHS
I'm not aware of any such policy that forbids red links in Recent Deaths sections. matt91486 (talk) 19:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

About Gürman Siblings article.
It has a Turkish page. Doesn't it enough for keep the article? OnurTcontribs 22:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VartCrows.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:VartCrows.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Tone & Notability
Hello...thanks for your input on Chris Taylor (Music Attorney). Could you elaborate further on tone & notability for this article? More ref needed? Ref not legitimate? Please let me know. Thanks. RealityDreamer (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Trusted (band)
A tag has been placed on Trusted (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Latics 01:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

frank bango
Hey man, apologies, I'd not seen the criteria for notability before. Looking at it you made the right call - I don't think Frank Bango qualifies (though I'd qualify that by saying I'm from the UK and he's from the US so it's possible he's been written about in US publications that I'm not aware about). I still have high hopes of him becoming notable because I love the man and his music but don't have a problem with your nomination. You may also want to nominate The_sweet_songs_of_decay Beanrobot (talk) 20:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:HughCornwellMayday.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HughCornwellMayday.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

artist award page names
Instead of immediately moving several pages (which could very easily be reverted soon), why don't you first discuss the naming conventions at WikiProject Music or with User:Gary King who has created many of these pages? -- Scorpion0422 21:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you indeed acted a bit rashly in moving the awards pages. Originally, they were titled "List of [artist] awards", but they were later changed to "List of awards and nominations received by [artist]" as that is more accurate. In certain cases, it is necessary to avoid confusion, such as "List of Ludacris awards" might convince some people that it is a list of awards that are released by Ludacris, or are "ludicrous". Please undo the renames that you have done to articles, thanks. Gary King ( talk ) 02:36, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * i have done as you asked, although i think it's pathetically unlikely that any such "confusion" of which you talk could ever arise.  tomasz.  12:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If an article can be titled "List of awards and nominations received by [artist]" rather than "List of [artist] awards and nominations", then why not? The former is clearer than the latter, even if only by a little. The only disadvantage is that it's a bit longer. If you want to see some of the background on this topic, then see this. There are a few more discussions that I can point you to if you'd like. Gary King ( talk ) 17:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Anyways, thanks for moving them back. And yes, you are free to move the other awards list to that format. It's probably a good idea to do so so that the standard is propagated. Gary King ( talk ) 17:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

You cant spell slaughter without laughter
Any chance that this could be moved to an article on the band? I dug up a couple sources for the band, and they're on an apparently notable label, so they might be notable enough for their own page. Otherwise I'd tag the album for CSD. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Well, I was right. I have now made a page for I Set My Friends On Fire. Mind if I close this as a redirect? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Template Substitution
Hi there. When you add a welcome template to a users talk page please remember to substitute it. If you need more details, help or wish to reply to this message please contact me on my talk page. Thanks  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 14:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

The Coits
I left a note on the discussion page of "The Coits". We are looking into buying some of the catalogue. The group has a huge Washington DC presence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nektarios (talk • contribs) 17:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * answered at the page, cheers.  tomasz.  17:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Format of Recent deaths
Hi, you contribution at Talk:Deaths in 2008 would be appreciated. Regards, WWGB (talk) 23:41, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Blackrain
Just a friendly note on Blackrain. I declined the speedy because the article lists an international tour, which would meet WP:MUSIC. Feel free to take to AfD if it needs to go.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:AfghanWhigs1965.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AfghanWhigs1965.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ResidentsAnimalLover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:ResidentsAnimalLover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Lyrics to Go

 * The template doesn't prove anything. And as far as there being a maxi-single, where's your source? THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Aux Sable Records
An article that you have been involved in editing, Aux Sable Records, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Aux Sable Records. Thank you. B.Wind (talk) 08:19, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Gramsci Melodic AfD Discussion
Hello, I read your post about the legitimacy of the article. I wanted to let you know that an additional source has been added, in addition to new commentary on the discussion page. I thank you for taking the time to weigh in on this. Even if we disagree on the article's place, this process has certainly strengthened it as a whole.
 * "A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:"
 * "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the musician or ensemble itself and reliable."::::
 * and::
 * "Has won or placed in a major music competition."::::
 * Based on the exact wording of the guideline, this criteria has been met::::
 * furthermore::
 * "notable if it meets any one of the following criteria"::::

Granted, my legal background may not be based around contract law, but if one meets the stated criteria then there should certainly be no reason to deny said author. I am not asking for a change in the guidelines. Quite to the contrary, I am asking that the guidelines be followed and not changed retroactively. Thanks again. Abtmcm (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Abtmcm

Splitting months??
Why speak against "splitting months"? No one ever suggested splitting months. The suggestion was that the whole month would be visible until a specified time after it ended. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:10, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Deaths in February 2007 revert
Hi

Re this revert - I put that tag there because I couldn't put it on either of the Jock Dodds or Hat-trick articles as neither claims that he holds or has held such a record. Are -tags not permitted on certain types of pages? If so, rather than simply revert, shouldn't the challenged/disputed statement be removed? 58.8.3.119 (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

2008-2009 UK retail crisis
has, as is clearly indicated by the template at the top of the page, proposed that the content be merged into List of business failures and opened a discussion about it on that page's talk page. As per his comments there, lacking any opposition, he went ahead and made the change. I consider it unfortunate therefore that you've simply gone ahead and reverted this. You've not raised issue with the move nor did you actually explain your reasoning for reverting the change because you didn't provide an edit summary. In the absence of any explanation as to your opposition to this change, I will be reverting it in-line with what Donnie Park proposed and subsequently implemented. If you want to comment on this then please do so at the discussion here. Adambro (talk) 12:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * oh, well, if you consider it unfortunate, i suppose i'll leave a reason at the page, then.  tomasz.  12:29, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Adambro (talk) 13:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fat Pat (Rapper), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fat Pat (Rapper) was moved to Fat Pat (rapper) by W guice (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-07-12T13:52:42+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Hip hop WikiProject Roll Call
Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BareLennox.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:BareLennox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:59, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Wrinkles' Execution Last Meal
Yes, his last meal took place three days prior. This is normal in Indiana to avoid the condemned from being too nervous to eat in the final hours thus missing their meal. In reality it is not their last meal as they continue to get normal meals after this formality. Its only called the "last meal" because of the formality of it. It can be considered this because they get to pick what they want instead of getting the normal prison meals for that day. The reference in the article states this issue. Just though I would let you know this since you seemed confused or was wondering if it was true. JeremyWJ (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GPonteGPonte.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:GPonteGPonte.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * it certainly is being used in an article. try Gabry Ponte (album). someone had broken the infobox meaning the picture wasn't registering as being "in" the article at all.  tomasz.  13:37, 31 December 2009 (UTC)