User talk:Wach ana mklkh

Speedy deletion nomination of Renderforest


A tag has been placed on Renderforest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - MrX 12:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Renderforest page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=729772886 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F729772886%7CRenderforest%5D%5D Ask for help])

Nomination of Renderforest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renderforest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Renderforest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —Cryptic 14:57, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi.
Hello, fellow Wikipedian. I come in peace, do not be alarmed!

I can see that we're butting heads a little here, but I trust your edits are in good faith and you just don't quite understand Wikipedia policy. I nominated your article for deletion and stated my reasons, but rather than fix the problem, you deleted the nomination twice (once with an IP sock, by the way). Please don't do that. I appreciate you correcting the mis-quoted data that I pointed out, but you haven't really addressed the issue with the sources. Unfortunately, if you don't communicate, we aren't going to reach an understanding. The admins are not likely to see your side if you continue to disrupt procedure like this. Jergling (talk) 16:45, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I'd like to apologize if I was too harsh on your article today. I can see now that you really meant well, and I shouldn't have attributed to malice what could have been dismissed as a misunderstanding. You shouldn't be punished for trying in earnest to add to the knowledge pool, and I'm sorry for calling your work promotional/spammy/dishonest. Jergling (talk) 18:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Renderforest. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 16:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)