User talk:Wadea.z

November 2014
Hello, I'm Lor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ebla with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lor Chat 22:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Ebla
Hello, its not a single person decision to remove a very well sourced controversial section.. which you did in Ebla.. this debate is still alive and it need to be addressed in wikipedia, it is one of the most important sections ... It is fully sourced and cant be deleted just because you think its old and wrong information, the sources used are the newest ones and written by people who have the same authority as pettinato or even more. pettinato is the one who caused the controversy not the one who fixed it, and his claims are still alive for some people. Its wikipedia job to show all the views, in the Ebla article, all the views are presented and cant be deleted like that, the article is classified as a good article which mean that it was reviewed and verified, hence the deletion of sourced material in this manner is something that should be avoided --Attar-Aram syria (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2014 (UTC)