User talk:Waffleeeeee22321

Hi Waffleeeeee22321. Respectfully looking to understand why you removed Bobby LaKind and Willie Weeks from the Timeline chart of the official Doobie Brothers. They were both listed as Doobie Brothers on the 1982 Farewell album, and LaKind was listed as a member on the Cycles album. No other sideman has ever been listed as a member on a Doobie Brother album. Thank you. StrangersFan StrangersFan (talk) 03:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hi, any explanation for this? Best, CCS81 (talk) 16:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Cristabel0. I wanted to let you know that your edit on Nikki Sixx have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. - Cristabel0 (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cristabel0 (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Boulevard of Broken Dreams (Green Day song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Cristabel0 (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A.R.M. 17:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Editing summary exclusion
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks!

A z C o y 7 (talk) 04:22, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Please refrain from changing the parameters and colours of membership timelines, as you did to The Byrds, without providing a rationale or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. The current colour scheme and parameters are the result of discussions on the talk page, and also follow the generally accepted format for timelines on Wikipedia. Continually reverting edits in order to make these changes to suit your own point of view is considered disruptive and an example of edit warring. Thank you. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 14:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of King Crimson members. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 01:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Never Ending Tour. ''

Unexplained changes without consensus'' - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:25, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Never Ending Tour‎; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 16:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

May 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 18:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)