User talk:Waggers/Archive 8

Chandler's Ford
Just thought I'd give you a heads up on this article. That unsourced statement about an upsurge in crime keeps getting added back in by that unregistered user - I'm not going to get drawn into an edit war but he seems to have bee in his bonnet over it. Martocticvs 12:17, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of churches in Hampshire
List of churches in Hampshire, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of churches in Hampshire satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of churches in Hampshire and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of churches in Hampshire during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. • Freechild   'sup?   18:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Your block on 163.248.111.234
You no sooner blocked 163.248.111.234 than 163.248.111.235 showed up, deleting on Plate tectonicsLeadSongDog (talk) 21:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bitterne Park Baptist Church
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bitterne Park Baptist Church, has been relisted for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Bitterne Park Baptist Church (2nd nomination). Thank you. Datestamp for archiving: Waggers 22:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

what was worng with the josh hutcherson edit?
i think it is true and factual don't you agree with me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irisbla (talk • contribs) 15:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Datestamp for archiving: Waggers 22:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

CHANDLER'S FORD (AKA 'THE FORD')Why are you giving a final warning for reinstating a posting with citations?
Earlier today you reverted my posting which had citations, so I reinstated it. I think you are abusing the responsibility you have been given as an administrator by reverting posts simply because you don't like them. If you revert a posting I make with a citation again then I shall raise a formal complaint with Wikipedia with a view to getting your administrator rights removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.202.55 (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Datestamp for archiving: Waggers 22:58, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

My userpage
Thanks for the super-fast revert of the vandalism on my userpage (and equally quick block of the offending user)! :-) IronGargoyle (talk) 20:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD for Cold War Crisis
Hi, I only retracted two of the four pages from deletion. I'm not sure about the policies on this, but I'm pretty sure the discussion shouldn't be closed until the issues about the other two mods are finished (or the pages deleted since nobody even bothered to defend them). Please tell me what I should do. AKFrost (talk) 20:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Caleb Guillotte
Good job on this closure and merger. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Restoration of Messiah (band)
I would like to pursue the restoration of the entry for Messiah(band) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah_%28band%29). How I can I go about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.76.103.236 (talk) 16:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Fongaboo (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Adminship
Waggers, Dave and Padraig - a while back you left some messages on my talk page supporting the idea of me going for adminship ... well I thought about it and if your support is still there I think I'd like to run the gauntlet of the process. I'm not sure whether to self-nominate or whether one of you would. In either case, would you still be supportive of the idea? --sony-youth pléigh 15:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Waggers. I've filled in all the bits and bobs and transclued it to RfA. --sony-youth pléigh 19:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Blacklist
I have removed the entry relating to your removal of tvrage from the log. If you make further edits to the blacklist please ensure you deal with the logging as well. Thanks -- Herby talk thyme 13:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi. FYI, I have expressed some concerns about the tvrage.com domain in response to your comments at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist. -- A. B. (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Whitelist
Sorry meant to get back to you yesterday. Feel free to put a req in on the whitelist for the url you want & I'll get it done today, tomorrow at the latest - regards -- Herby  talk thyme 08:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Done - should be ok - let me know if not - cheers -- Herby talk thyme 10:27, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy Holidays
Happy Holidays Thedjatclubrock :) ''' (T/C)

My RfA
Thanks, Waggers, and no need to feel bad about it not being successful. It was a whim - I really don't see having access to the admin tools as being a big deal - and as you know my skin is thinker than that, so it doesn't put me out so much!

I might turn my hand to it again in another few months, if the idea takes me once more. Thanks for your support and very kind words of support. Hope it's was a merry Christmas. --sony-youth pléigh 16:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Portal:Berkshire
Hi, I see you've started work on Portal:Berkshire. I founded Portal:South East England, Portal:Hampshire and Portal:Oxfordshire. Along with the other maintainers at P:SEE, our vision is to see a portal for each county in the South East England area, the selected content of which P:SEE will then feed off of. Portal:Berkshire has been on my to-do list for a while. I know all about WP:OWN but creating portals often feels like a very personal achievement and I don't want you to feel like I'm treading on your toes - so I thought I'd better ask - would it be ok if I help out with the portal development and add a few selected items? I'll aim to use a similar set up as the ones at P:Hants and P:OX since they work well and are fairly easy to maintain. Cheers, Waggers (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there Waggers, that's absolutely fine. I got distracted by starting a Berkshire WikiProject just after I started the portal, so feel free to do whatever you like to it! Hopefully after the WikiProject's got going I'll be able to pick out some selected material, fingers crossed featured. If I get time, I'd quite like to help out with the SEE portal, would be nice to see it featured! Many thanks, Sea serpent 85 14:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

RE:WP:BITE
Eeep, I kinda jumped the gun there. Sorry. :-p -- ShadowJester07 ► Talk 08:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Request for comment on Category Redirect template
Because you are a member of WikiProject Categories, your input is invited on some proposed changes to the design of the Category redirect template. Please feel free to view the proposals and comment on the template talk page. --Russ (talk) 21:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Delyth Jewell
This person does exist and has a fair amount of links devoted to her on the internet. Nothing written was factually incorrect and below is a link to today's show on BBC Cymru on which she appears

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/networks/cymru/aod.shtml?cymru/post_cyntaf_fri —Preceding unsigned comment added by Semipro2 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:YFridayRevolution.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:YFridayRevolution.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC) '''Sorry, we weren't able to suggest any articles for you. Something is probably wrong on our end.'''

62.189.161.193
User talk:62.189.161.193 is at it again. On June 2007, you banned anon edits from this IP address. Please consider re-implementing the ban. Thanks! Groink (talk) 21:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Your threats
''Great. So you keep harping on about "The Truth", bias and personal attacks and then in one post deny an established fact and engage in petty name calling. For goodness' sake, Sarah, grow up. Waggers (talk) 08:37, 25 January 2008 (UTC)''


 * I denied no "fact". And what you choose to call "petty name-calling" (which you reported nonetheless) is a very richly deserved response to your continued threats. That ludicrous Arbcom decision only serves to facilitate your bully-boy tactics.Sarah777 (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: Given that Sarah is blocked and her user talk page is protected, I see no merit in responding to the above at this time. Besides, there's nothing of any substance there to respond to, just a lot of posturing and trolling. Waggers (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just about to advice Sarah to cool off & accept her 7-day British Isles ban without complaint. I was too late. GoodDay (talk) 21:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Removing user from WP:AIAV
How come you removed Bircham from AIV? This user made a legal threat, and per WP:LEGAL, they need to be blocked until they rescind their threat. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 22:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Read that, but shouldn't they be blocked, since they've already received a warning for legal threats, and a final warning for an unrelated matter? Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 22:23, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Molobo
Hi. Can I suggest adding User:Molobo to the list on Requests for arbitration/Digwuren? He was banned already for 1 year for disruptive behavior, and continues to edit disruptively. Would do it myself, but you are more neutral. Many thanks -- Chris 73 | Talk 12:01, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

AIV report on
Hello, you declined to block after I reported them on WP:AIV as a spam-only account. Did you look at their contributions before removing the report from the page and slapping a template two templates on my talk page? It is obviously a spam only account, and should be blocked forthwith. Cheers, &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 16:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did look at their contributions, and also their talk page. Their contributions look like those of a new editor who is not familiar with our WP:NPOV policy, not of a deliberate vandal. Try talking to them, you haven't attempted to warn them once. Reports should only be made to WP:AIV after they have edited after a final warning. Please stop wasting our time by repeatedly posting a report there before this has occurred. Thank you. Waggers (talk) 16:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have raised the matter at WP:ANI. &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 16:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism after the warning
Re: ''last edit was at 09:12, warning was given at 09:30. How is that vandalism after the warning?) ''


 * Looking at the edit history and the talk page, I figure the AIV reporter was referring to a level 4 warning one day and three hours earlier. Doczilla (talk) 09:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, I realize that, but in your edit summary you'd asked how that was vandalism after the level 4 warning. You're right about why that wasn't recent enough. In fact, there were a couple of acceptable edits somewhere in between. Doczilla (talk) 09:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for blocking 124.40.47.107, his page-blanking was getting quite tiring. --Muna (talk) 09:44, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Oops!
'''Sorry, about that, I saw your message. I will use the sandbox for now on...''' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.199.130.229 (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Erm...
Not sure if you're aware... you've been vandalized. (ApJ (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC))

Nevermind, you got it. xD (ApJ (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2008 (UTC))

Wikipaedia
Waggers has violated the NPOV policy by enforcing British English spellings on at least one article, this time for the meter. While Anglophones worldwide seem perfectly capable of living in harmony, this user is creating a divisive culture on Wikipedia construed around his favorite way to spell certain words. Waggers, ntil Jimbo renames this site "Wikipaedia," please spend your time making constructive reverts and fighting legitimate vandalism, or get away from your PC and go have a "pint." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.0.233.3 (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey YOU!
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive reverting. The next time you beat Compwhizii to a revert, you will be blocked from editing. :)   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  21:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC) that was a joke if you didn't realize


 * I know, I use Huggle too :)   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  21:57, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, he does beat me too. I'll make sure to warn him next time :)   Compwhiz II ( Talk )( Contribs )  22:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

AGF
I think we can discount the assumption of good faith on the recent edits to Alison's talk page; I'd go straight to AIV with this sort of thing, with a short explanation that it's part of a rotating IP attack.  Acroterion  (talk)  21:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

hey sorry i was told that you could change things around.its true.once agian im sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsonry (talk • contribs) 22:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Chinook salmon
That editor may have had a point. I've been looking into whether that was misidentified, and I see that a picture of the same fish appears on the chinook and coho pages (not just the same species - the exact same fish. check the spots). I think he may be wrong about which is which though, from what I've been reading the difference is that the chinook has spots on both the top and bottom of the tailfin, which that fish does. Going to leave a comment... well in several places. Needs an expert to check. --Bazzargh (talk) 22:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Are you a racist like Cumulus Clouds
Are you a racist like Cumulus Clouds, or are you following his racist efforts ignorantly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.241.190 (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

RE:Pillow
Hi Waggers When you said unconstructive what did you mean? And the edit i made, about masturbating, I use a pillow for that every time. Please reply Sebastien290194 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebastien290194 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Blanking of articles marked for deletion
Hi. When you see an article previously marked for speedy deletion that has been blanked by its creator, the best course of action is to just add db-blanked and be done with it. Unlike other speedy deletion criteria, this one does not warrant a user warning. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 14:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

213:
We made a mistake with that deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.133.197.136 (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

peer review == ==

I was wondering if you could take some time out of your schedule to head over to the Heroes (TV series) talkpage and give us an honest peer review. The page has gone through some major changes in the last few months, and it would be fantastic if a prominent editor/contributor like yourself, could head over and give us at the Heroes Wikiproject some sound opinion and ideas on improvements for the page. We have all worked very hard at improving the page, and we need great outside, reliable and trustworthy users to come over and help us improve. I you are interested in joining the peer review discussion with other prominent users/contributors, much like yourself, please follow the link. Thank you very much for your help and your continued effort to improve Wikipedia and its quality! Peer review/Heroes (TV series)/archive2-- ChrisisinChrist  comments and complaints here! 20:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Delete Tag
Hi there, please help to take a look at Sonia Sui tag. Thank you. TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's settled. Thanks anyway. TheAsianGURU (talk) 00:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Waggers, Mansfield is my home town.

It is the second biggest town in the county after Nottingham itself.

Please believe me on that, we don't have much to shout about.

Equally it was famous for being the biggest town in Europe without a railway station until the mid 90's, sources of which I can happily provide.

Thanks Luke —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukemawbey (talk • contribs) 01:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

HOK Sport Venue Event
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of HOK Sport Venue Event, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: HOK Sport + Venue + Event. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I, Voyagerfan5761 (Tuvok), award you:


 * Response to your reply on my page. :) Tuvok[T@lk/Improve] 14:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

rajkumar.
I discussed in the discussion page... there are almost no refrences, redundant sections like trivia and roles and complete mess. Kulshi Balu. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulshi balu (talk • contribs) 08:23, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Newschool skiing
Why do you keep sending messages about "abuse" and "vandalism"? I am actually trying to correct other people's mistakes and vandalism! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.253.59.119 (talk) 14:08, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Fakie skiing
Knowledgeable newschool skiers are well aware of "fakie". "Switch" is incorrect.

See http://www.freezeonline.com/freeze/how_to/article/0,13122,330959,00.html

I will do the cite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.253.59.119 (talk) 14:55, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

John Delaney Edit
I received a message regarding an unconstructive edit. I made no such edit. This is a shared computer. (University) Yours —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.120.146.147 (talk) 11:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Unless you can prove to me he is real I will keep reverting it. 68.0.149.121 (talk) 22:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

OpenAir PSA
Halp. Don't... wanna... punch... newb... - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Jack Belton
Hi I see that you speedy deleted Jack Belton, which is fine (it was someone's joke a stub on thoroughly non-notable person).

However, I was disappointed to see that you followed up by deleting a series of backlinks. The links in Members of the 13th Dáil, Members of the 14th Dáil, Members of the 15th Dáil, Members of the 16th Dáil and Members of the 17th Dáil were all to this Jack Belton, who was for 17 years a member of Dáil Éireann, the lower house of the Irish parliament.

The article has not yet been written, but is quite proper to have redlinks to a requested article where the subject is clearly notable, a Belton is.

I have therefore restored the backlinks. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Waggers, I think you thanked the wrong person..... I just restored the original message following vandalism ;-) StephenBuxton (talk) 14:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Statistical survey
What nonesense! Such a section blatantly adverstising; I'll expand on the talk page. --Pretty Green (talk) 11:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * lol, 's ok. Under an old account I used to do RC patrolling, I know its easy to make an error now and again if you do so much! --Pretty Green (talk) 11:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Block of User:62.77.161.89
Hello Waggers. Thank you for blocking this repeat vandal. I just wondered if you might increase the time of the block to more than a mere 24 hours. I know that this is a school account, but, it looks as though no constructive edits have been made from this computer and previous blocking admins have always increased the block time based on this fact. They even made one more vandalizing post after I had reported them. If you don't want to increase the time I will understand. It just means that I, or someone else, will be reporting them again before the weekend is over. Thank you for your time and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 15:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply and your consideration. Take care and have a great weekend. MarnetteD | Talk 15:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Many thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. Thank you-RFD (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I had been reverting the vandalism done to the Chilton (town), Wisconsin page. The same editor who blanked my user page now tells myself I will be block amd all I am doing is reverting the vandalism.Thanks-RFD (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Alfred Hitchcock
Excuse me, but I am not Vandalizing. I fixed the article, since there was no link for Motifs. I know I made typos a couple of times but I fixed them. 142.162.15.17 (talk) 22:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
for the revert :). Seraphim&hearts;  Whipp 23:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

What's your problem?
Could you please leave me alone, thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irbster2 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I request that you leave this user alone, as he will be dealt with as users see fit. Keep your thoughts to yourself from this point on. Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irbster2 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Datestamp for archiving: Waggers (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

reverting my edits on ps3 system software page
Please read discussion pages before reverting edits. I had CLEARLY explained my reasons, and it was 100% constructive for the article. I am British, however the mass demographic use the spelling 'color' not 'colour', and the other words were changed to keep the peace as they mean the same thing but are spelt the same way both sides of the pond. Chocobogamer (talk) 22:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Edits like this are unhelpful. Especially considering the nature of the contributions made by the editor (notably trying to reach a compromise in a content dispute). —Locke Cole • t • c 23:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Edits that are apparently the result of a talk page discussion and don't refer to that discussion in the edit summary are unhelpful. I was RC patrolling and saw someone changing English to Americaneze for no reason other than "more people speak it", which is against policy.  On that basis I was correct to revert and warn.  Waggers (talk) 12:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandal: 212.121.214.11
Hi

I see you blocked this last week. It's clearly immune to messages left on its talk page. Would it be possible to get a longer ban? Zain Ebrahim (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Datestamp for archiving: Waggers (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Valentine's Day!


FLc is wishing you a Happy Valentine's Day! This greeting promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

Spread the love by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Datestamp for archiving: Waggers (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Simulated reality
Fine. My intent was not to delete or vandalize. I added content. At least take a look at this version then: 14:09, 9 February 2008.

The critisism contained therein should be added right on the spot to point out the hypothetical nature of the author's musing. Thank you.
 * Datestamp for archiving: Waggers (talk) 11:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

About vandalism in Need for Speed (section)
About vandalism in Need for Speed (section), please forgive me, because i am not very good in english... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.206.252.45 (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

British Isles
Hello Waggers. Why are Matt & Sony arguing? The term British Isles is here to stay, just like the term Irish Sea. It's not important if they're (the terms) offensive or not. GoodDay (talk) 00:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)