User talk:Waggie/Archives/2019/May

Help me verify this topic (Mysterium Network)
Hello,

I do not have any connection to this project outside covering it on Wikipedia in the most streamlined fashion possible.

I believe the sources cited are in line with others I have seen posted here on Wikipedia as they are from major news outlets focusing directly on the topic of Virtual Private Networks and otherwise. It would be extremely helpful if you could take a closer look at this article as I put a lot of time into making sure it would be appropriate for Wikipedia over the course of multiple edits and rejections now.

Appreciate all your hard work and taking the time to look at this,

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryptozen (talk • contribs)
 * Hi, I believe that I outlined the problems with the sources already, so I'm not sure what would be gained by going over them again. I'm sorry that's not the answer you're looking for. Waggie (talk) 08:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

what's wrong on my article
Can you please tell me what's wrong on my article.? (Draft:Riyas Ayr) Wsmchbd (talk) 07:21, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, much like the person requesting assistance above, I did provide a fairly comprehensive comment regarding what I found wrong with your draft, and I"m not sure what else I can explain. Is there something you'd like further explanation of? In addition, I notice that this has already been created and deleted numerous times, so I suspect that you've already been down this road before. Waggie (talk) 08:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Request on 13:03:35, 17 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Williamwryan1
Hi Waggie, Thank you for your review of my Richard A French article submission. I have made a couple of changes regarding references, which appear to be the reason for the non-acceptance of the piece and resubmitted it for another review. Is it possible for you to be the one to review it? It would certainly be helpful if I could work with a single editor to remedy any problems. Most appreciative, Bill Ryan

Williamwryan1 (talk) 13:03, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello, most reviewers will not review a draft more than once in order to give the best possible chance for both improvement and, hopefully, ultimate acceptance of drafts. I am one of those reviewers. In any case, I would certainly decline it in it's current state. I note that there is quite a bit of unsourced content (not acceptable). I will also note that the inline external links fail our external link policy. What is your relation to French? You may not realize this, but if you're affiliated with him in some way, you must declare that affiliation according to the Wikimedia Terms of Use. Best wishes to you. Waggie (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Waggie, Thank you for the brisk reply to my request of having a single editor to work with in publishing my article concerning Dr. Richard Alan French. I understand now that Wikipedia protocol discourages such an arrangement. I have also included in my Talk Page that I am receiving compensation for the inclusion. What confuses me is the claim by you and other reviewers that I have "quite a bit of unsourced content" in this piece. I wish I could have actual examples from my piece of this pointed out to me,since I think I have a significant number of appropriate citations. I do not see an obvious discrepancy between my use of citations and other published pieces already present on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. Williamryan1

NPR Newsletter No.18


Hello ,

, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
 * WMF at work on NPP Improvements
 * Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
 * Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
 * Reliable Sources for NPP

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
 * Backlog drive coming soon


 * News
 * Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.


 * Discussions of interest
 * A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
 * There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
 * What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vector Packet Processing was Rejected
Thank you for reviewing my Wikipedia submission.

Would you be able to give me a specific example in this draft that should be sourced?

I have cited 16 references from 11 different independent sources. I did think that would be enough sources for this page, but if not I can get more.

If you would be able to give an example in this draft I can remove the content or find the appropriate reference.

As a reference I used these other Linux Foundation projects. They seem to have similar references.

Security-Enhanced Linux

Data Plane Development Kit

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks

173.38.117.71 (talk) 17:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)jdenisco