User talk:Wagnermr/sandbox

This is where peer review feedback for Magnermr's LH contributions should be posted. Do this by clicking the New section button above. Remember to sign your Wiki username and complete the Canvas quiz to get credit for your peer review work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 16:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Aroub Jamal peer review
Peer review questions

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? yes

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? yes

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes, there are some errors in the citation that wiki has highlighted in red that might need fixing.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, I think that adding how LH contributes is a great addition to the article. Yes the information that is being added is new and revilement to the article.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? I think that additional information can be added regarding LH association with other diseases such as cancer or diabetes.

Aroub Jamal (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Olivia DeRose peer review
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Sources look good, except #4 is a primary source.

Are the citations formatted correctly? review the red highlights in the sources.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? 1. Yes, LH regulation by GnRH is not mentioned in the background info. 2. Yes, this edit provides are more detailed method of how testosterone is produced.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? no Libby732 (talk) 19:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)