User talk:Wahakadha mustakhdim

Welcome!
Hi Wahakadha mustakhdim! I noticed your contributions to Kartal&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Pronunciation
Hi, thank you for adding transcriptions. However, please note that IPAc-en is, as the name implies, exclusively for notating how English speakers pronounce words, and cannot be used for suggesting an approximate pronunciation using the phonology of English (which inevitably lacks some sounds or phonotactics any other language has). If you want to add how Turkish speakers pronounce Turkish words, please use complying with the conventions laid out in the Help:IPA/Turkish key. If you want to add how English speakers pronounce the name of a place in Turkey, please cite a reliable source that verifies they in fact do—failing to do so would be a violation of the No original research policy. Thanks! Nardog (talk) 14:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Why does the page Barcelona has English pronunciation without a source given? Before stopping me, please try to remove the English pronunciation from there, get reverted, go discuss it, and establish a consensus about removing the Enlish pronunciation from the articles of non-English speaking places. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 13:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That there exists unsourced content is not an excuse to add more. Barcelona is an internationally well-known city and it's trivially easy to find multiple sources that back up the transcription, whereas violates the phonotactics of English so it's not even remotely plausible that English speakers pronounce Gümüşhane as such. Nardog (talk) 15:06, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Please do not continue to bug me about the Israel-Palestine conflict. It is against the rules to proxy for an editor with less than 500 edits. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Okay, you're trying not to outspeak that you fully support Israel's actions. I'm not making potentially controversial edits on contentious pages at the moment, if that's your concern. Completely out of topic, if someone (guess who) with above 500 edits is disturbed by women and children being murdered, he himself would denounce it via editing the contentious pages to make them mention the neutral, proven facts about the atrocities, when people with below 500 could not. Just saying. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Crow, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan Bloch (talk) 19:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Glad you finished ditching through my contribs finding "mistakes" to correct. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 19:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, turns out you didn't. Go on, revert every change I made :) Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 19:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Envelope. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. This edit created a grammar error.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Sorry, didn't knew that not being a native English speaker is a warnable offense. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Please do not make grammar copyedits that you are not sure are correct. I do not understand how this minor request is questionable or inappropriate. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:38, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll try my best on that one. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 16:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I've revoked ECP
You need 500 normal edits. You were clearly gaming the system. So once again, you cannot edit articles in the conflict area until another Administrator restores it. Doug Weller talk 17:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * No. You've revoked my ECP not because my edits are not "normal", but because I'm pro-Palestine, that is, pro-Humanity. I know that neither you nor another admin wouldn't restore my ECP, even if I made 5000 "normal" edits. Because your definition of normalcy is likely just Zionism. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 18:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Wahakadha mustakhdim you could not be more wrong about what I think. And I expect a lot of your redirects will need reveriting. Doug Weller  talk 19:10, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * This, and so many other unlikely redirects you have created, are not "normal" edits. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:20, 1 March 2024 (UTC).
 * I modeled that after the redirect Jew by birth. If singular is okay, why not the plural? Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 19:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for personal attacks
I have blocked you for 48 hours for your attacks against Doug Weller just above. Please read No personal attacks and Assume good faith. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC).


 * So you think that calling somebody Zionist is assuming "bad faith"? Because I did not said that. It's your take. Wahakadha mustakhdim (talk) 19:17, 1 March 2024 (UTC)