User talk:Wahooker

Votes for deletion/American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property
Please explain how this article is "notable" w.r.t. Inappropriate Uses of Wikipedia? Ariele 03:09, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

requested move of Buff (EverQuest terminology)
Hiya, regarding the requested move of Buff (EverQuest terminology) to Buff (MMORPG terminology), this is a perfectly sensible suggestion and you should be able to do it yourself. If for some reason you can't move the page, please modify the article so it would reflect the second title, and I'll do the move for you. Cheers, Talrias (t | e | c) 9 July 2005 14:08 (UTC)

USSCOTW
I just wanted to let you know, History of South Carolina(which you voted for is the current USSCOTW. Please come and help make it a featured-standard article. Falphin 22:55, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

Wolverine (comics)
Hi there. Never talked to you before but there is a guy that has been continually making changes (for the worse) to the Wolverine (comics) entry which then have to be overturned by at least 6 differint wikipedians just about every two days. His behavior is getting a little out of hand and I just wanted to show you an example of what I am talking about.ScifiterX 07:38, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

This is copied from my (ScifiterX) talk page.

'''"Call it like I see it" does not constitute reasoning, or a cogent argument. I have responded to your accusations and other statements by explaining why they don't hold up, pointing out your manipulation and distortion of words and their meanings, your unnecessary insults, and so forth. What you refer to as your logic is actually paralogia, and merely asserting that it is sound, or that I have done what you accused me of doesn't make it true. I have refuted your statements by showing why they are false, and you have been unable or wiling to do the same, preferring to respond only with rhetoric. I have pointed out that you have not provided reasoing or examples to support your accusations, which is simply true. Your statement that I have been doing what you said I did is a prime example. I made a statement about how an article being long has nothing to do with whether it makes sense. This is a reasonable statement. Yet you reply with a non-sequitur about what I've done. What exactly is that? You never elaborate on these comments, which makes them nothing more than rhetorical. Rhetoric and Argument by Fiat is veridically invalid, and does not validate your position. Nightscream 7.12.05. 7.12.05. 1:46am EST.'''

Wow, looks like somebody was busy with there dictionary tonight. I read this to two of my friends and they were just about rolling on the floor laughing. "Your logic is actually paralogia." "Rhetoric and Argument by Fiat is veridically invalid." How can I read that with a straight face? I mean really, I have never insulted the guy. But, he is being a nuisance and now he leaves me these little gems on my talk page. I see a new one just about every time I log in. Is he doing this because he craves attention or something? ScifiterX 07:19, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Buff (MMORPG terminology)'s original name?
Hi. User:Uly has suggested that Buff (MMORPG terminology) be moved to Buff (computer gaming). What I was wondering is, do you remember what it was called before you worked on moving it? I would hate to move it to computer gaming only to find out later that it was *originally* called that and moved to MMORPG terminology. You can reply here or on Talk:Buff (MMORPG terminology) if you remember. Thanks! --Syrthiss 04:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

International Adoption Dossier
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article International Adoption Dossier, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of International Adoption Dossier. Double Blue (Talk) 13:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)