User talk:Wahyudi Aulia

Speedy deletion nomination of Let's Talk! Programme
Hello Wahyudi Aulia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Let's Talk! Programme for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. -- Orduin  ⋠ T ⋡ 17:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Let's Talk! Programme


A tag has been placed on Let's Talk! Programme, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kolbasz (talk) 23:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with... Let's_Talk!_Programme, I already got two speedy deletion tag for that page. Need your help. Wahyudi Aulia (talk) 05:58, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi there. People seem to think the article is an advert. Try rewritting the article in a more encyclopedic tone. If you want to contest the deletion, leave a message on the talk page, but don't remove the notice.  George Edward C –  Talk  –  Contributions  08:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * If you are writing about something you are involved with, it can be quite difficult to write a proper encyclopedia article--and in fact, our policies suggest that you do not try. (If you are involved with this organization, please read and understand WP:PSCOI.)  However, if you do wish to continue writing such an article, here's a strategy that may help.
 * One of the basic hurdles any article here must meet is passing our notability guideline, which requires substantial coverage in third-party, reliable sources. These are usually things such as newspaper articles and magazine articles, and excludes press releases.
 * My best advice is to start over, and then work at finding those quality sources. Find out what they talk about, and how.  Then, write your article based almost entirely on those sources--don't copy them or paraphrase them, but summarize what they say together, using them as a hint as to which facts to state, and what sort of language to use.  You can use primary sources to fill in entirely neutral and uncontroversial facts (where's the organization located?), but the use of primary sources should be a minimum.
 * This process is likely to be frustrating for you if you take any other path. Best of luck! --j⚛e deckertalk 16:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I've marked this help request as completed. In addition to the excellent advice given above, I would like to suggest that you thoroughly read these two articles, Wikipedia guide to your first article and what Wikipadia is.  Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not just a compilation of whatever people want to post.  Finally, remember that "reliable sources" means books, newspapers, magazines, and NOT self-published sites or sites anyone can edit.  Use these guides and the links in the Welcome message at the top of this page to learn what Wikipedia is before you continue your article. —&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160;Bill W.&#160;&#160;  &#160;&#160; (Talk)&#160;&#160;(Contrib)&#160;&#160; (User:Wtwilson3) &#160;&#160;— 16:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Let's Talk! Programme has been reverted. Your edit here to Let's Talk! Programme was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://fb.com/letstalktosucceed/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anupmehra was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wahyudi Aulia/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Wahyudi_Aulia Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anupmehra&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Wahyudi_Aulia reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anupmehra - Let's talk!  12:10, 30 January 2015 (UTC)