User talk:Waikiki2006

The Disappearance of the Universe
Please stop trying to insert your own opinion, weasel words and uncited claims or refutations of the criticisms of this text. Please provide a citation from a reliable source to support your insertion. Also, please be aware of the three revert rule regarding repeatedly inserting text to an article. Thanks. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 06:15, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 14:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Sir, please understand, that I do not speak this out of any desire to say "ha ha", but you must know, that you can continue to revert for a short time, but you will soon be banned, likely for a period of 24 hours. At that point, the reversion warring will end. If you have an issue, please take it up with Zim on his talk page, or even better, on the talk page you have been reverting. I certainly don't know if your change is worthy; that's why you two can discuss it. But I do know that ignoring the issue will get you nowhere; I've seen this kind of discussion before. Good luck, but please, use the talk pages after your ban is lifted. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 03:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. JoshuaZ 07:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I have blocked you for 24 hours for edit warring as soon as your last block expired. Please discuss the matter on the article talk page. The next block will be longer. JoshuaZ 19:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

The Kenneth Wapnick Article deletion/ reinstatement review
Hi Waikiki, I noted your editing of the Gary Renard article and I thought you might be interested in a discussion going on about whether or not Wikipedia should include an article about Kenneth Wapnick at: the Article Deletion Review board. Your input over there would be most appreciated.


 * Thanks,
 * -Scott P. 10:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)