User talk:Waikikiuser

September 2019
Hello, I'm 122.108.183.105. I noticed that you recently removed content from Shin Gallery without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. 122.108.183.105 (talk) 08:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm AllyD. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Shin Gallery have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Ally, Im Jakub Julian Ziolkowski, Im a husband of Hyon Gyon who is an artist and victim of this gallery, Mr Shin has a court case with another artist who left the gallery (Keunim Lee), and there are more victims of course (Loredana Sperini, J.Park) and we collected lots of evidences but we decides not to go to court but we will i form public if Mr Shin will act against rules again, and he is doing this all the time. In 2018/2019 4 or 5 artists left this gallery from total 6/7 represented, isnt it enough? If wikipedia is a place where we store truth so this simple information should be there, if a famous curator was kicked out from Museum because of #metoo - and its in his bio in Wiki, therefore i guess people have right to know why so many artists left this gallery, especially Mr.Shin is talking lies about my wife and other people. Im an artist by myself with big international career and i know that nobody protects artists. What is wrong with that sentence? I won’t stop, people have right to know the truth, or not? Please advice how i can ads this information because many information from this article is not true. Waikikiuser (talk) 11:04, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * A Wikipedia article needs to be neutrally worded and neither promoting or criticising the subject of the article or individuals associated with it. Statements added to an article need to be verifiable from reliable 3rd party sources, especially where living people are concerned. In a situation such as you are describing, this would be something like coverage of a controversy or conclusion of a court case reported in an established media report. If such exists, then they can be used to support a statement, but if they don't then this falls into a Wikipedia:Advocacy situation which doesn't primarily belong here. AllyD (talk) 13:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)