User talk:Wailbail

March 2022
Hello, I'm Fram. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The Adventures of Tintin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. You improved nothing and broke the infobox while doing this. Fram (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kalasag, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 11:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CGP Grey, you may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 12:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your edits often break things for no good reason. Parameter names, template names, ... don't need to be "corrected" if they work already, and certainly not to versions that don't work. Your grammar corrections often aren't improvements at all, just changes from e.g. British to American or vice versa, even though both are allowed here and people shouldn't change one to the other. Your "short descriptions" aren't improvements either. Changes to quotes, or to article titles, should normally not be done. And the facts you try to change, like adding "French" to Hergé, are incorrect as well. All in all, your edits are at best inconsequential and too often making articles worse. Please stop or you will end up being blocked. Fram (talk) 12:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kalasag. Serols (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Wailbail. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 09:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Wailbail, I am not certain whether you were being intentionally disruptive, or if you are just not very good at writing in the English language. If it is the latter, then some of the warnings above for vandalism are probably a bit harsh. However, you should not have created a second account to carry on editing in the same manner. If you wish to be unblocked, you will need to indicate in your unblock request that you are willing to limit yourself to a single account, and that you will stop attempting to 'fix' grammar and spellings, because you have been introducing more errors and inconsistencies than you fixed. Girth Summit  (blether)  09:56, 14 March 2022 (UTC)