User talk:Wakowako/Archive. 2019

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Scouts Royale Brotherhood


A tag has been placed on Draft:Scouts Royale Brotherhood requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://gangsallabout.blogspot.com/2017/02/scouts-royale-brotherhood-srb-saraba.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  12:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Baleleng has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baleleng. Thanks! &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baleleng has been accepted
 Baleleng, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! ~Kvng (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Baleleng help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

August 2019
Your addition to Her Secret has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 21:06, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

TheFamousPeople.com as a source
Hi Wakowako. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in Andrés Bonifacio. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manang Biday, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gloria Romero ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Manang_Biday check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Manang_Biday?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

CSD at Hochschaubahn
Hi - just to let you know I removed your CSD template on this article as there was enough information to identify the topic, and content was available from the German wikipedia to create a basic article. Other reasons for deletion may exist, so feel free to take to AFD if you still feel it's not suitable for inclusion. Hugsyrup 14:43, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Redirect Help
Thank you for contacting me. I was looking to create a redirect from IDRA the Agency to the Interior Design Resource Agency page but had already created the page before I figured out how to create a redirect. Are you able to take care of creating the redirect from IDRA the Agency to the Interior Design Resource Agency page for me instead of just deleting it. I’m a new user and learning alot. Thank you for your help. Youremybridge (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Youremybridge please see WP:MAKER --Wakowako (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Absa Bank
Hello Wakowako. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Absa Bank, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: how is "largest commercial bank in South Africa" with 37k+ employees not a claim of significance? Thank you. So Why  09:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jr.Exile
Hello Wakowako, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jr.Exile, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''clearly claims signfiicance: notable label, notable company, part of notable entity, has multiple notable members. . If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA'''. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. So Why  09:17, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Why this article can't in Wikipedia
Tapta is a popular singer in Manipur. Tapta is Also known as Band name or Tapta is also known as on of the characters in folk tales in Manipur. But this article is about Singer Tapta Who is also known as Tapta Jayenta.

Which part of this article is not feasible in this Wikipedia. Don't simply tag speedy deletion.Awangba Mangang (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Copyright violation is not accepted in Wikipedia WP:COPYVIO do not just copy and paste from copyrighted articles, you have to make it in your own words--Wakowako (talk) 06:50, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jack Stauber
Hello Wakowako. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jack Stauber, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''The Google Play page link indicates that it was copied from this article itself and mentions the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License; the YouTube page indicates that it was "auto-generated", presumably from this article. (Apologies for the scary bold in this reply, it's what the speedy decline script does.).''' Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Page
Hi I would just like to ask what changes need to be made for Marcus Valerius Maximus Lactuca, because you mentioned that their is some issues with the page BigRed606 (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2019 (UTC)


 * hello please see  WP:MOSBIO as your guide to rewrite Spurius Verginius Tricostus Caeliomontanus, happy editing --Wakowako (talk) 14:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you give suggestions because when I read the page and compare it too other page of similar content I see very little differences. BigRed606 (talk) 14:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)


 * at least an autobiography should be written like this:

Lead Section -The lead section must summarise the life and works of the person Opening Paragraph - #Name(s) and title(s), if any. Handling of the subject's name is covered below in. Context - The opening paragraph should usually provide context for the activities that made the person notable Positions - should describe the person as they are commonly described in reliable sources--Wakowako (talk) 14:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Dates of birth and death, if found in secondary sources (do not use primary sources for birth dates of living persons or other private details about them).
 * 2) Context (location or nationality);
 * 3) The noteworthy position(s) the person held, activities they took part in, or roles they played;
 * 4) Why the person is notable.

Mangoo
Hello, Wakowako! You tagged a page I created, DJ Mangoo, as not meeting 'Wikipedia's notability guideline for music' but I think it was the wrong call because the guideline requires musicians to 'have a single on any country's national music chart', in order to satisfy it. In this case, Mangoo has two songs charted in two countries (Sweden and Switzerland). Additionally, he also 'has had a work used as the basis for a later composition by a songwriter, composer or lyricist who meets the criteria' ("Eurodancer" which was sampled by Alan Walker's "Play"). What do you think? MushroomDiamond (talk) 13:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

User:MushroomDiamond Hi, I agree with you, it was a wrong tag. I take time to read all the sources you have provided (though in Swedish). It will be cleaned up. --Wakowako (talk) 05:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Tag to Stathis Kalyvas
Thank you for your contribution to the Kalyvas article. It was a bit fast though, 4 mins after I created it to add a tag seems very fast, at least to me. Thanks again for taking the time to contribute.Greece666 (talk) 14:43, 30 September 2019 (UTC)


 * - sorry for that, but I'm a NEW PAGES patroller WP:NPP, doesn't mean to offend if that was a fast tag. --Wakowako (talk) 05:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply. No worries.

Copyvios
Hi. Just a heads up that many local news sources, and definitely user contributed sites like Quora, just copy and paste wikipedia content into their articles (e.g. the Manipuri cuisine and Irom Chanu Sharmila articles. Be wary when you find what appears to be a copyvio from dubious looking sources. Best wishes. --regentspark (comment) 16:09, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of Island of the Mad
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Island of the Mad. I do not think that Island of the Mad fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because '''Only short phrases, such as the names of the major characters, matched the alleged source. This is NOT a copyvio.'''. I request that you consider not re-tagging Island of the Mad for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 03:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)


 * DES - it was already edited by the page creator and the copypasted phrases were already removed before you have reviewed it. 98% of it was copy and pasted, it was in fact a COPYVIO. anyway, thanks--Wakowako (talk) 06:01, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I should have checked the history better. I have done a revision delete on all versions that contain the pasted text, and again warned the poster. Thanks for the tag and for this note. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 12:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Wakowako. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:38, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.


 * Barkeep49 Thank you, I will follow the rules and will read tutorials to fully understand the right things to do.--Wakowako (talk) 05:13, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Translation
I have created the page 'Calligrafismo' mainly by translatiing the Italian page but I couldn'T find a template where I can indicate it it the article (at least not in Visual Editor). So how to sign it? Kapeter77 (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Kapeter77, I will try to help you the best that I can, there was already a tag the last time I visit the page.--Wakowako (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Wakowako And what is the solution? Kapeter77 (talk) 06:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Kapeter77 are you still expanding the article? If you're done expanding/translating, then you can use the template Rough translation see Template:Rough translation

Helen Steel archived references/sources
Hi Wakowako, would you explain why you just archived the links in the article? Whats that all about? I havent seen it on here before and I don't get it. Thanks ClarityRandom (talk) 06:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ClarityRandom - its Pre-emptive archiving. Sources you have provided are webpages that may alter and may in time completely disappear. This will ensure your source link accessibility and stability. This is not deleting your references, I am saving your references to become a deadlink in the future.--Wakowako (talk) 06:36, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Wakowako, the problem is that while I am working on it I need to see the sources I am using. Also I am in discussion with another editor who thinks that the subject isn't notable, and is asking me to add more sources (see article talk page) so it is much better all round if we can see the sources. I would prefer to keep the references visible if that's no trouble for you.ClarityRandom (talk) 06:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ClarityRandom -Noted. Would you mind if you could put In use template so that other patrollers will not interfere while you're working on it? See Template:Under construction for your reference.--Wakowako (talk) 06:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Wakowako - Sure. Thanks, your suggestion is very helpful ClarityRandom (talk) 07:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Constantin Movilă
Would you be happy to remove a deletion template from this article? Another editor put it there, copying what I wrote on my blog. My last comment was not answered by this other editor.: 12akd (talk) 07:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Constantin Movilă requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 05:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

What's the problem with this? I previously created such an article, but it was reclassified as a draft. I developed it and put it here. Why is it wrong? 12akd (talk) 05:42, 27 October 2019 (UTC) :, See the reason gave in the CSD. :I do not see any indication of notability for this person. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

I understand. But I think it's about a famous person, a prince. Like many other Moldavian princes (List of rulers of Moldavia), this prince has many biographies and is available in several languages ​​(eg Catalan, German, French, Polish, Russian, Ukrainian). 12akd (talk) 05:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

12akd Definitely pass WP:GNG and does not meet A7 for speedy delete. Please provide inline citation, see WP:IC--Wakowako (talk) 07:33, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. I didn't want to delete it, but User: MoonyTheDwarf. 12akd (talk) 07:39, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately I can't give you notes because I worked on French Wikipedia and they are not there. 12akd (talk) 07:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * 12akd The page may need cleanup, I want to help, but I need more time to read the references you have provided which may not be possible for me now.--Wakowako (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Unfortunately, I'm not an expert in the field (I'm Hungarian, non-Romanian, anyway), but I thought these missing biographies were important to the biographies of the world's rulers. Regards: 12akd (talk) 07:50, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello ,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. There are now holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action. Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays. Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox. Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards. Admin has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13. The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Getting the queue to 0
 * Coordinator
 * This month's refresher course
 * Tools
 * It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
 * It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
 * Reviewer Feedback
 * Second set of eyes
 * Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
 * Do be sure to have our talk page  on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
 * Arbitration Committee
 * Community Wish list

Have you heard about PhilWiki Community?
Did you know that there is a small community of editors in the Philippines who meet up and conduct activities online and offline to promote Wikimedia projects? Please take a look at our profile here. You might be interested to join. Thanks. --Filipinayzd 13:00, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Wakowako. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 (talk) 03:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Please consider helping get the huge backlog (around 6,000 pages) down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
 * Barkeep49 Thank you for giving another permission to be a WP:NPP, I will do my best to do everything to help and will strictly follow the rules.--Wakowako (talk) 06:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please don't revert the edits
Please don't revert the edits on the page "Nongshaba" As they are meant for improving the page so that it may not meet the deletion criteria. Goutamkumar Oinam 2 (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Goutamkumar Oinam 2 move it to draft and incubate, the article is not ready for the main page. Either another editor could tag it for AfD--Wakowako (talk) 11:13, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Undoing good faith edits by new users with no explanation
Earlonne Woods is on my watchlist because I created the redirect. I see that a brand new editor started to create an article and you reverted back to a redirect with only "redirect" as an edit summary and no message to the user. In the future, please try to remember that this doesn't help anyone to know what was wrong, how to improve it, and how to avoid having work redirected. (To be clear, I'm not saying it shouldn't have been turned back into a redirect -- I'm skeptical this person should have a stand-alone article rather than be covered in Ear Hustle, but that's sort of beside the point). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 15:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)