User talk:Waky02

Copyright problems with The Jerusalem Kollel
Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Jerusalem Kollel, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, The Jerusalem Kollel appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Jerusalem Kollel has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Per Ardua (talk) 20:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Jerusalem Kollel
A tag has been placed on The Jerusalem Kollel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scjessey (talk) 19:41, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Jerusalem Kollel has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b (links: http://thejerusalemkollel.blogspot.com/, http://rabbiygefen.blogspot.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

i am just a little bit confused about the last one were i had tried to add external links of two blogs containing articles written by students of the Kollel about religious study and thought. Which were immediately removed i am now left with a cryptic message. can you explain what it means. Thank You --Waky02 (talk) 20:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi there. Blogs are generally considered to be unreliable sources and are discouraged. In your specific case, the links you tried to add, for some reason or another, got on a blacklist, and are automatically removed by a bot. You'll probably have to find more reliable sources. Please re-read the message above for more information. -- &oelig; &trade; 20:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Jerusalem Kollel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Jerusalem Kollel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to establish notability with reliable sources. A bit spammy with some peacock terms.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scjessey (talk) 23:10, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

The Jerusalem Kollel
ticket # 2009062810020167

[email removed]

Text of article june 25 10:00 est

i am just a little confused as what a OTRS tag is i also attempted to send permission for usage of the article text if anything else is required can you please posted it first on the article in questions dissctions page Thank You Waky02 (talk) 13:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I can confirm that the permission is valid for this article and you do not need to take any additional action on it. Stifle (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:Judaism
Hello. There is already a link to Kollel in the template. See the section titled "Religious Kehilla & institutions" in the middle of the template.

The problem was trying to move the link from one line to another, which made one line much longer than the other. Is there some reason to move the link to Kollel? If so, please let me know and we can work together to find a solution. — Malik Shabazz 04:22, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Now I understand. I moved the link. — Malik Shabazz 02:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Jerusalem Kollel
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Jerusalem Kollel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to establish notability with reliable sources, per WP:GROUP and WP:RS.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Per Ardua (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Jerusalem Kollel


The article The Jerusalem Kollel has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable education program, consists mainly of list of graduates, with references that don't mention the subject of the article. Seems to be an advertisement, even following extensive cleanup. No reliable sources per WP:RS available online to establish notability per WP:GROUP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Per Ardua (talk) 18:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)