User talk:WaldenLi

June 2022
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Andrew Lelling. This much focus on Chen is inappropriate and WP:UNDUE given the primary sources you provided Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Did you check the references I listed, or are you involved in this case? What was deleted by you were not poorly referenced. They include: the official indictment press release by DOJ, the response by MIT president on MIT press, and letters signed by numerous MIT staff, among others. Lelling was the one leading the case, and was the one giving the press release. He is responsible for this case, and again, what you deleted are hard facts verified by sound sources.
 * Given how the current page about Lelling is formulated, this page is more like his CV than about presenting the truth. I question your neutrality in this case. What you wrote appears to be an attempt to shift his responsibility away from him to the general initiative, while details about the case point to obvious decisions by those immediately responsible. In contrast, the positive cases written about him showed no such responsibility shift. WaldenLi (talk) 06:48, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I did look at the sources you provided and I believe the DOJ, MIT (president and staff), and youtube sources are improper. We have very strict sourcing requirements for biographies of living people. My removal was brought on by a complaint by the subject at the BLP noticeboards. Please contribute to the discussion at . Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:19, 7 June 2022 (UTC)