User talk:Walidou47

Welcome!
Hello, Walidou47, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Paleo Neonate  – 20:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

November 2019
Your recent editing history at Gastritis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You area already over... Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:26, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Gastritis. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Recent reviews
Gastritis has lots of reviews. Generally we want recent ones. This one if from 30 years ago. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10.2165%2F00007256-199009030-00004

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:20, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

I Agree,I could not find a recent one not being a primary source.Walidou47 (talk) 00:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Main treatments
Three are mentioned here  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Copy and pasting
You are not allowed to do this as it is copyright infringement. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi James shoud i re-write what is on the reference ? And is a sentence taken from a book really a copyright infringement if yes please why? Walidou47 (talk) 20:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * You need to fully paraphrase. Not just change a few words but also change the sentence structure. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 19:19, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Copy and pasting
You cannot do this. You much paraphrase. It is a requirement. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:56, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

"====Varioliform gastritis==== Varioliform gastritis (VG) is a special case of chronic gastritis characterised by nodules, thickened fugal folds and erosions. These features appear to be unusual and different from those seen in chronic gastritis. The frequency of varioliform gastritis is estimated to be found in 0.3 to 2.8% of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. The diagnosis can be made by endoscopic examination. "

Source says

"Varioliform gastritis is currently recognized as a special kind of chronic gastritis characterized by nodules, thickened fugal folds and erosions. These features appear to be unusual and different from those seen in chronic gastritis. The frequency of varioliform gastritis rarely exceeds 3% and the diagnosis can be easily made by endoscopic examination." https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12358650_Varioliform_gastritis_Frequency_and_relationship_with_lymphocytic_gastritis

Lymphocytic gastritis
Lymphocytic gastritis (LG) is a special case of chronic gastritis characterized by intraepithelial lymphocytosis (typically between 40 and 60 per 100 epithelial cells) involving the foveolar epithelium, as well as expansion of lamina propria. It is strongly associated to VG with up to 82% of cases. "

I can the issue with VG but not with LG, can you please point as to why you removed LG ? User:Doc James Walidou47 (talk) 02:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Ref says "Lymphocytic gastritis (LG) is characterized by intraepithelial lymphocytosis involving the foveolar epithelium, as well as expansion of lamina propria by chronic inflammation. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 04:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

MDPI
Is a possible predatory publisher... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

WP:Preserve
Keep the WP:Preserve policy in mind when editing. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 12:41, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

We did you remove "however, these stories are not accurate."
And why did you remove hyperthyroidism? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

"however, these stories are not accurate." no source says so hyperthyroidism as a cause no ref says soWalidou47 (talk) 10:35, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * So the ref supports hyperthyroidism.
 * And the ref supports that these stories are not accurate. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 10:41, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok let us begin with hyperthyroidism the source is here : https://web.archive.org/web/20091019054800/http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/insomnia/article/10168/1163082 first source is not that good, but anyway, where can we find hyperthyroidism as a cause of insomnia ? thanksWalidou47 (talk) 10:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * You revert again and you may be blocked.
 * That is not the source being used. The source being used is here Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 10:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Frontier journals
Are also possibly predatory. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:07, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

I will look into it. Thanks Walidou47 (talk) 11:29, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

You are right. Better to trim sources like that. Walidou47 (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Menstrual migraine
It appears some of this material was copied and pasted from other places. You need to list the places it was copied from or it may be removed. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:24, 20 January 2020 (UTC) User:Doc James it was copied from simple.wikipedia.Walidou47 (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes so you need to say that in your first edit. With a link to the url on simple Wikipedia. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 20:47, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok I did not know. What should I do now ?Walidou47 (talk) 20:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Just mention it in your next edit summary. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 12:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

With respect to this source
"HMB can also be treated with supplementation of vitamin A, indeed, vitamin A has been found to be significantly lower in women with HMB than healthy control subjects. A dose of 60,000 international units (IU) vitamin A for 35 days can reduce or normalize blood loss in such patients. "

It does not really meet WP:MEDRS in that it is not a major medical textbook. It is also a fairly extraordinary claim and thus would need high quality evidence. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:42, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * User talk:Doc James How do you measure this : "major medical textbook" ?Walidou47 (talk) 12:46, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Ones used to educate physicians in medical school. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 13:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

This source
Is listed as a case report and is from 1990. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Ginger may also be an effective treatment for migraine.

Ref supports
Not seeing were you have consensus to remove it? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:29, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

I think that I do not need consensus to remove it Walidou47 (talk) 10:47, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Were does the ref support
"Ginger, betel, clove, and garlic may be effective in relieving pain of migraine. "

The ref simple says the are used which is totally different... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:45, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

It also says why they are used.. Walidou47 (talk) 07:51, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That is definitely an extraordinary claim and as such needs extraordinary evidence. That book supports the use of homeopathy which makes it questionable. As it is not a major medical textbook it is not MEDRS. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 11:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Journal is unreliable: Complementary therapies in medicine
This source is on Wikipedia WP:CITEWATCH as unreliable, shown here. The sentence where you are trying to add is already sufficiently sourced and discussed on the Bacopa monnieri talk page. Warning about WP:WAR and WP:3RR. --Zefr (talk) 22:03, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I am sorry but I can not find the journal "Complementary therapies in medicine" maybe you thought that it is "Alternative & Complementary Therapies"Walidou47 (talk) 22:15, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Simple... if you try. Just look for the journal name under #7, "Alternative medcine" [show]. You have exceeded 3RR on Bacopa monnieri, and are being disruptive. If you don't revert your own edit within a short while, I'll report you to admin for warring and request a block. --Zefr (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It's an alternative medicine journal. Alternative medicine is pseudoscience and quackery, and not used as reliable for medical content or sources at Wikipedia. Read the disclaimer here. --Zefr (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The sentence in question is already sourced to 3 studies in more reliable journals, even though the study designs were dubious and results unconvincing, as stated: Preliminary clinical research found that Bacopa monnieri may improve cognition.

User:Zefr When I read the article it seems to me like it is an evidence based journal as it does not talk about untested and untestable medecine (the def of alternative medicine).Walidou47 (talk) 10:20, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * By definition, alternative medicine is not based in rigorous science but rather in traditional belief practices, which are grounded in quackery. The journal and study in question - Complementary therapies in medicine - represent a publication of poorly designed and doubtful alternative medicine studies, making use of the source dubious and unusable by the disclaimer reasons shown at WP:CITEWATCH. A similar conclusion applies to the journal you used today in the article, Drug Target Insights, which is not even indexed in Medline, and has a disqualifying low impact factor -- all of which mean the journal and its contents are not trustworthy or qualified by scientific consensus among peers. I've discussed this enough, so will not be returning for debate unless other editors get involved on the Bacopa monnieri talk page. Please invest the time to read WP:MEDRS and WP:WHYMEDRS for guidance on how to choose high-quality sources for medical topics. --Zefr (talk) 16:58, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

DTI is indexed in    CrossRef Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) Opac-ACNP| Catalogo Italiano dei periodici Opac-SBN | Catalogo del servizio bibliotecario nazionale PubMed Central (PMC) ROAD | Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources Scopus WorldCat where in MEDRS does it say that being indexed in MEDLINE is a requirement for being a high-quality source ?Walidou47 (talk) 17:21, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Not being pubmed indexed is a worrisome sign that a source might not be suitable. Even if pubmed indexed it does not mean it is sufficient though. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 00:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Zinc deficiency into Zinc. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Ref
Needed here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lysergic_acid_diethylamide&curid=17537&diff=939604334&oldid=939573062&diffmode=source

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Lysergic acid diethylamide
PsychonautWiki is not compatibly licensed; please don't copy from there. — Diannaa (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gastritis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gastritis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gastritis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Repeated removal of content from "Happiness" article
Hi Walidou47, I regret that you have declined my invitation to discuss your edits to "Happiness" and have gone ahead and removed the content for a third time. This is not a collaborative way to proceed. As you have not done so I have raised the matter on the talk page myself. Please discuss there if, having read my comments, you feel you still have pertinent points to make. Otherwise, as I have no wish to breach the the three-revert rule, please self-revert your deletion back to the established status, thank you. Captainllama (talk) 20:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gastritis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Candida ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gastritis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gastritis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Editing
So yes this source is under an open and compatible license https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549811/

But you still need to copy edit it. You cannot just copy and paste it into Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok can you please refer me to the rule that says that, thanksWalidou47 (talk) 07:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:MEDMOS and WP:MOS Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Is a perfectly good source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 16:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)


 * You are at three reverts again. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 16:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Here is the source: as you can see this source is drugs.com and it is not published by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. If I did not understand please be kind to explain to me thanks and sorry for the reverts as i was sure of the mistake in the source. Walidou47 (talk) 16:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Scroll down to the bottom of the document. Drugs.com is an agragator of content, which is often published by others. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 16:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your addition to Uterine contraction has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. '' — Diannaa (talk) 11:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I understand I made a mistake and I'm sorry for that, I was going to paraphrase what I have copied and it took me some time to copy bits of what I considered useful information for the public. Is it possible to have at least a copy of what was the unlawful edited article with copyrighted material just so I can copy it locally and paraphrase it after. It will save me so much time. ThanksWalidou47 (talk) 18:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * "I made a mistake" is understating the case by quite a bit, since this is your third and final warning for violations of the copyright policy. Violations are detected by automated plagiarism detection software. You need to stop immediately with the copy-pasting or I will block you.— Diannaa (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * ok thanks for your clemency, best regardsWalidou47 (talk) 23:11, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Still I kindly ask you if its possible to have a version of the last deleted copyrighted article so I can re-work it. Thanks a lot Walidou47 (talk) 23:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

What does this mean
"Anonymous author" Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:59, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

"Rules"
What happened why you deleted my request? Narrate me the Rule which you are talking about. Zoglophie (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Reporting vandalism
Hey Walidou47,

It took me a while to learn this but you can enable a function called “Twinkle” which will help you report vandals without the hassle of editing the noticeboard page. It also allows you to directly revert vandal edits by clicking one button. You can find it in “Preferences” at the top of your page, in the section “Gadgets.” Hope this helps!  Woerich   (talk)   19:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Also, Twinkle will allow you to quickly post warning templates to vandal talk pages. Administrators may not block the vandal if they aren’t convinced they have been sufficiently warned - so when you want someone blocked, make sure to leave a “paper trail” of sorts that will justify getting them blocked. I posted the warnings for you. Take care!  Woerich   (talk)   19:39, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

60 year old book
Seriously we can do better than that. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erotic asphyxiation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypoxia ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Erotic_asphyxiation check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Erotic_asphyxiation?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Ongoing copyright problems despite multiple warnings
In this edit you added:

"has shown success in preventing pain attacks in approximately 50-60% of the drug-resistant chronic headache patients treated at experienced centers." and "has been shown to be effective for selected patients with intractable migraine or cluster headache, although it is regarded as a cost-expensive treatment with a significant rate of complications."

Both which are verbatim copy and pasted from the source. This is like the six episoid.

User:Diannaa your thoughts? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * This also contains copyright issues Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 23:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Diannaa (talk) 12:18, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note, they have also been blocked for the sock User:Lil heartthief. Any appeal would need to address both issues.  Dennis Brown - 2&cent; 18:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Using User:Lil heartthief as a sock. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 09:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I just blocked as another confirmed sock. This is now a CU block.--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)