User talk:WalkingRadiance

August 2021
Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Small modular reactor, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rosbif73 (talk) 17:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello ScientistBuilder! Your additions to Ray tracing (graphics) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. See Close paraphrasing for why your edit to Ray tracing (graphics) was still a copyright infringement. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Big o list for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big o list is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Big o list until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AryKun (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Added Euler recording to Current Recordings page
Hi! I saw you were doing a spoken version of the Euler article, so I stuck it in the table on the current recordings page. I hope that's alright – that way, we can make sure different people don't end up making different versions of the same article at the same time (which does happen sometimes, even with the large number of articles to choose from), and also have a sense of what's going on besides our own work. Once you're finished, you can take it off again, and add any other articles you start. Good luck with the recording! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrownfootfalls (talk • contribs) 15:09, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 17:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Which article are you referring to? ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not affiliated with the links I posted. ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It is related to the subject. The examples in the math articles are good. Sometimes it helps to see more examples. This is why I added this link. ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * What specific guidelines in the External Link article does it not follow?
 * I'm not disputing your point I just would like to know what is the specific issue. ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You are repetitively adding links in violation of WP:ELNO points 4 and 11. You should not be systematically adding links in this fashion. - MrOllie (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not trying to crowdfund or raise awareness of a website. ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * As regards WP:ELNO point 4. ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Should I revert the math edits? ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I have already reverted them. Just don't add more of these links and everything will be fine. MrOllie (talk) 17:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Why are the links irrevelant? I do not maintain the site I linked to. ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I figured out the issue.
 * I don't meet this criteria:
 * Review your intentions. Wikipedia is not a space for personal promotion or the promotion of products, services, web sites, fandoms, ideologies, or other memes. If you are here to tell readers how great something is, or to get exposure for an idea or product that nobody has heard of yet, you are in the wrong place. Likewise, if you are here to make sure that the famous Wikipedia cites you as the authority on something (and possibly to pull up your sagging PageRank) you will probably be disappointed, because Wikipedia uses nofollow on all external links, thereby causing search engines to effectively ignore them.
 * ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Talk:ITER does not have an edit summary.&#32;You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Constant314 (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Can I make an edit summary after the fact? ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:26, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * How can I find the reasoning for the demotion of an article from B to C status?
 * I didn't even have time to respond to suggestions. ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The reference tooltip is not working for me. ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The ITER reference tooltip with efn only displays a little JavaScript link in the lower left hand corner of Chrome but nothing pops up. ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I also sometimes have trouble figuring out exactly how to use some of the templates. What I do is find a use in another article that does what I want and I copy it.  I don't know what you are doing wrong.  You might want to experiment in your sandbox.
 * There is no way to add edit summaries after the fact, but there is an option to remind you to do it automatically. That is what I use.  It is on the editing menu on the preferences link on the top right-hand side of the page.
 * The best way to find out why an article is demoted to ask the editor that demoted it or ask on the talk page. In the case that I think you are asking about, it was probably to cut off premature GA nominations. The GA review of a class B article would probably be rejected based on WP:SNOW.  Making GA nominations for articles that are not ready slows down the already backlogged GA review process. Constant314 (talk) 03:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Your edit to System of linear equations has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Atomic clock does not have an edit summary.&#32;You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Constant314 (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Refs to books
Hi, I noticed your edits to Electromagnetism. Just a reminder: when you cite a book, you need to include the page number(s) in the book that support the specific information. Happy editing! Schazjmd  (talk)  19:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Which book are you referring to?
 * The volta book? ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You added refs to two books without providing the page numbers in either. Schazjmd   (talk)  19:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I do not have access to the books. Should I remove the books? ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * If you don't have access to the books, how do you know each supports the specific information that you cited them for? Schazjmd   (talk)  20:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * The book for Oersted was in the article on Oersted.
 * The other book was written by oersted. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
  Hello, !  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes ( ~ ), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Constant314 (talk) 02:53, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Verifying references
You seem to be adding references without verifying that the references actually establish the facts for which they are cited. For example, this edit you cited a source to for the statement "The long-term stability of hydrogen maser standards decreases because of changes in the cavity's properties over time", yet the source does not even include the words stability or cavity. Adding references without verifying their content degrades the quality of Wikipedia. Please do not guess. I cannot tell, but you may be depending on synthesis (WP:SYN), which also something that is not allowed. Continuing this behavior could be considered disruptive. Constant314</b> (talk) 03:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse comment
Hi I saw your comment at teahouse and thought this might help. Its a translator utility. It is quite widely used on WP. .  scope_creep Talk  01:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Verifying references, again
Your addition to the article about Maxwell "Maxwell believed in the Trinity, which played a role in his development of differential equations that unified electricity and magnetism." was reverted because the reference did not mention Maxwell. There are other examples of your additions with non-useful references, hence reverted. Please be metriculous in your referencing. David notMD (talk) 11:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I think the article should have some part about the subject but I understand why the edit was reverted. ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding questionable sources such as personal websites and newspaper articles for science related article content. see wp:RS - DVdm (talk) 19:20, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * What pillar of Wikipedia are you basing your argument on? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * You are using synthesis (WP:SYN), again. I understand the temptation.  We all use synthesis often.  But it is not allowed in Wikipedia.  It takes a lot of self-discipline to realize when you are doing it and avoid it.  You are making a statement and then adding sources as evidence.  Your statement may be correct, but we do not use sources that way.  Statement must be paraphrased from reliable sources (WP:RS), not synthesized.  For example, you use a NYT column as a source for “Maxwell's equations is an example of mathematical beauty”.   But the source does not say that.  It tells us that someone conducted a poll of the Readers of Physics World magazine for the greatest equation and that Maxwell’s equation were among the top vote getters.   You are citing that as evidence of beauty.  It is flawed synthesis.  The poll was not about beauty.  There is no WP:RS to show that the population polled is representative of the rest of the world, and the winner of a beauty poll may still be ugly, if all the contestants were also ugly.  Your conclusions may be correct and useful, but Wikipedia does not want your conclusions.  They want you to accurately paraphrase reliable sources, and only that. Constant<b style="color: #1100cc;">314</b> (talk) 20:29, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Well I give up then. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I could add a specific factual claim but I not going to add anything else. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * There is a minority (probably shrinking) us that think scientific articles should be rigorous. We are trying to turn you into one of us. :) Constant<b style="color: #1100cc;">314</b> (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * How about this? Widely acknowledged as a theory of extraordinary beauty, Maxwell's equations has often been described as the most beautiful mathematical idea.
 * ScientistBuilder (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Not even close. The Feynman ref tells us that the authors think Maxwell's equations are beautiful.  The second one describes a poll where Maxwell's equations were highly voted, but it doesn't say that they were nominated for beauty. Constant<b style="color: #1100cc;">314</b> (talk) 02:12, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * well I have work to do on atomic clock and linear algebra ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * What makes General relativity's statement "Widely acknowledged as a theory of extraordinary beauty, general relativity has often been described as the most beautiful of all existing physical theories." valid but "Widely acknowledged as a theory of extraordinary beauty, Maxwell's equations has often been described as the most beautiful mathematical idea." invalid? ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @Constant314 ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * an important difference between the statement in General relativity and the one in Maxwell's equations, is that the former was established by wp:CONSENSUS on its talk page, whereas the latter was not. Or at least not yet. If you like to include the statement in the Maxwell's equations article, you need to make your case there (Talk:Maxwell's equations) with the relevant article contributors. Up to now, I have not seen a consensus there. - DVdm (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2022 (UTC)


 * There is also the principle that bad practice elsewhere on Wikipedia is never justification of new bad practice. Constant<b style="color: #1100cc;">314</b> (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi ScientistBuilder! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 00:47, Saturday, February 19, 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of \common.js


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, \common.js, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrOllie (talk) 03:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your contributed article, \Atomic Clock


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, \Atomic Clock. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Atomic clock. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Atomic clock. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MrOllie (talk) 03:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Atomic clock
 * added a link pointing to Mercury
 * System of linear equations
 * added a link pointing to Matrix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Don't use asterisk for multiplication
Don't do this: $$4.35*10^{-17}$$

Instead, do this: $$4.35 \times 10^{-17}$$

Or better still, within text, do this: $4.35$

The only time to use asterisk is if you are giving an explicit example of computer code. Constant<b style="color: #1100cc;">314</b> (talk) 23:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Use the rp template
If you do not give the page number in your in-line citation, then you should append the rp template to give the page number. This will be especially appreciated by any reviewers.

See Template:Rp. Constant<b style="color: #1100cc;">314</b> (talk) 20:51, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Resolving the gravitational redshift within a millimeter atomic sample article
Think te "Resolving the gravitational redshift within a millimeter atomic sample" arxiv.org article in open access pdf format might interest you. See https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2109/2109.12238.pdf.--Francis Flinch (talk) 13:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes I think it is very exciting ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Please don't copy material from elsewhere online
Hello. I am Diannaa and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * I will stop copying content ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:24, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Spoken articles
Hi, I noticed you are listed as contributing spoken articles for Leonhard Euler and Maxwell's equations on WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia/Currently recording. This is a reminder as it's been over two weeks. --JJLiu112 (talk) 06:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have made progress on the recordings but don't know how to attach the recordings. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Nontology
Hello! Question, is it possible to open up and repair the article about „Nontology" (engl) or „Nontologie"(ger) and would you like to help to work it out? But it is so to speak a wide field caused by the fact that Nontology is not only the science interested or focused on „nothing" as a non-ontologic and finaly empty source between positivity and negativity like the simple idea or calculation 0=1+(-1) It's definitely more then that, so for example a pseydo religious movement for atheists and their ability to believe in something if it's nothing! Also philosophic aspects, parts of parapsychology, mysticism and occultic meanings are united under the flag of nontology! What do you think about that complex and let me know please! Very nice greetings so far'n no fear! I very please 4 help! (Jenz Jenzen (talk) 14:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you talking about. I am a Christian that believes that Jesus was God and man so I am not interested in this. For details see, my Wikipedia user page and the Nicene Creed and the Chalcedonian creed and the creed of athanasius and the apostle's creed. ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Latin Letters used in Mathematics
Dear Scientist Builder,

Kabiryani here or Kabir for short! I am a new Wikipedian but I have set out to fully reference the 'Latin letters used in Mathematics' article! I see that you know a lot about SI units and your help would be much appreciated. I would be especially gracious if you could inform the members of the Mathematics WikiProject about the lack of citations on this incredibly important page! --Kabiryani (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * What article do you need help working on? The Latin letters in Mathematics? ScientistBuilder (talk) 17:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, the article is now called List of mathematical uses of Latin Letters! I am struggling to find citations for subjects such as linear algebra because my mathematical knowledge extends to trigonometry. I'm still in school so I've got lots to learn. I could use your help in finding the occasional citation that I am incapable of finding! If that interests you of course. Kabiryani (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

How to request resources
Several of the requests you've posted at WP:RX have replies. If someone supplies what you asked for, you are expected to mark the thread resolved so that it can be archived and volunteers no longer have to wade through it, or to respond with an explanation of why it is not resolved and what still needs to be done. Please take this opportunity to update your resource requests.

Also note that two of your requests appear to be for the same whole book. Such duplication is not helpful, and the service will not supply entire copyrighted books for legal reasons. If you can narrow your request to a modest portion, such as a single chapter, someone may be able to help you. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I am working on marking the requests as Resolved. ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ScientistBuilder

Thank you for creating Snow plow routing problem.

User:Whoisjohngalt, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whoisjohngalt (talk) 13:17, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Whoisjohngalt Where can I find the note you sent me? ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:21, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear ScientistBuilder, the note I sent you is above, I just thanked you for adding the article to Wikipedia and I also marked your snowplow problem page as Reviewed.Whoisjohngalt (talk) 13:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — Diannaa (talk) 20:10, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 20:12, 12 May 2022 (UTC)


 * What articles are copyright violations? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Diannaa I understand I breached the copyright for the cross product by inserting material from a book that was not mine. I will not edit by quoting a book and violate the copyright and make my own understanding instead of close paraphrasing. ScientistBuilder (talk) 21:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

@Yamla


 * @Diannaa@Yamla

This misses all of WP:FAIRUSE. --Yamla (talk) 10:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Yamla@Diannaa

ScientistBuilder (talk) 12:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Why did you say Wikipedia's license "No derivatives?" Does Wikipedia allow derivative works, or not? I am not talking about images here; I am talking about prose.Please describe how fair use applies to prose (not images).Please simply answer the questions; you don't need a new unblock template for each reply.— Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair use in the case of text is the limited use of copyrighted text without permission from the owner of the copyright text. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Diannaa Fair use does not interfere with copyright's basic objectives. Fair use was created to balance the interests of the public and the owners of the copyrighted works. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * In what types of situations would fair use of prose be appropriate?— Diannaa (talk) 13:48, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Diannaa The article and the subject of the fair use text are dependent on each other and related to each other. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:52, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That doesn't answer the question. The question is, in what type of situation would you copy some text as fair use rather than writing your own prose?— Diannaa (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I need to find the answer. Where is a good Wikipedia article on fair use prose? @Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Diannaa If the text is in the public domain I can copy the text without writing my own prose. ScientistBuilder (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * @Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Please don't post a new unblock request each time. Your answer is incorrect.— Diannaa (talk) 23:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Diannaa Can you provide a link to a Wikipedia policy page on public domain, prose, copyright, and fair use, or a part of an article? I thought you didn't have to worry about copyright infringement if something is in the public domain, for example, if one of Agatha Christy's novels copyright has expired 100 years later. ScientistBuilder (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I should have said: Your statement is correct, but it does not answer the question, which was about fair use. The question is, in what circumstances might you use someone's copyright prose as fair use, rather than writing your own?— Diannaa (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair use applies to using copyright material for research and scholarship. Fair use is a legal way to put copyrighted prose in a Wikipedia article with a citation. @Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 02:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That's true. Could you give me an example of why or when you would use fair use prose?— Diannaa (talk) 02:55, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I could put a quote by C.S. Lewis from one of his books which the copyright has not expired in the article about C.S. Lewis.@Diannaa ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:24, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Diannaa I would like to use the Wikipedia library to find a book when I am unblocked. I am looking for a book Computational Discrete Mathematics: Combinatorics and Graph Theory with Mathematica ® 1st Edition by Sriram Pemmaraju, and Steven Skiena. The book was published on December 8, 2003 by Cambridge University Press and I have access to the Cambridge database. I would like to request access to the Wikipedia library for combinatorics research. ScientistBuilder (talk) 13:33, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * That's a pretty good answer. I am going to unblock now, but I just want to point out that earlier you said Wikipedia's license is "No Derivatives" and that is incorrect. Please read up on this so you understand what derivative works are.Please note I will be monitoring all your contributions for the foreseeable future for any violations of our copyright policy. — Diannaa (talk) 13:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * @Di (they-them) Please unblock me so I can access Wikipedia Library. ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I meant to write @Diannaa.
 * I meant that Wikimedia Commons does not accept Creative Commons No Derivatives, not that Wikipedia's license is No Derivatives. I read this in Wikipedia The Missing Manual by John Broughton by Oreilly Media in 2008 or WP:MAN. I was stating I think No Derivative works should be allowed because if you are satisfied with your art work and you think its perfect you don't people doing something to it. I did not mean that Wikipedia has a No Derivatives license. I did mean that No Derivatives and Wikimedia Commons are incompatible. ScientistBuilder (talk) 14:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Lollipop chart moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lollipop chart, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Is Origin Lab Pro's lollipop plot blog post at https://blog.originlab.com/lollipop-plot a reliable source I could add to the article? ScientistBuilder (talk) 12:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Atomic clock into Optical clock. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Would the talk page be a good idea for attribution? ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I added attribution on Optical Clock talk page ScientistBuilder (talk) 20:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Posting on the talk page is optional; saying where you got your content in an edit summary is required. If you forget to do it, you can do it in a lter edit summary. — Diannaa (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I posted an edit summary ScientistBuilder (talk) 00:46, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of YMCA May Building (Huntington, West Virginia) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YMCA May Building (Huntington, West Virginia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/YMCA May Building (Huntington, West Virginia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 16:08, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi WalkingRadiance, I have participated at the AFD a bit; i hope you don't mind my calling the current article by a negative term (because it doesn't much develop the history of the Huntington YMCA building(s) and the organization. I'd like to see the article kept and developed more, with expansion to cover the whole topic of Huntington YMCA, the organization and its programs and all of its history and buildings.  You stated at the AFD that "I have two secondary sources"...Could you please post more at the AFD about what those are?  It is okay if they are not online documents.  If you have electronic versions of them, though, could you possible please email them to me (at my Userpage, select "Email this user"), so I could try to work with them?  Either way, thank you for your contributipons. Sincerely, --Doncram (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Edit Request Tool changes
Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail [✉️] 15:20, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Your edit to Large scale capacitated arc routing probem has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''This is your only warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.'' — Diannaa (talk) 03:51, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft
I saw your message in one of my talk page archives. That's not a good place to hold a conversation. I can check your draft, if you will provide me with a wikilink. I don't know where your draft is located, or specifically what you want me to check it against. Please answer on this page (not in my archives). Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

"List of Graph Theory Problems" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of Graph Theory Problems and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 26 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pichpich (talk) 22:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Here are a few graph theory topics: traveling salesman problem symmetric with triangle inequality, asymmetric traveling salesman, arc routing problems including chinese postman problem, directed chinese postman problem, mixed chinese postman problem, windy postman problem, rural postman problem, capacitated arc routing problem, downhill plowing with precedence, and maximal cardinality or minimum weight matchings and coverings and cliques. WalkingRadiance (talk) 00:42, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinese Postman Problem (October 8)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Felix QW was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinese Postman Problem and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chinese_Postman_Problem Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Felix_QW&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Chinese_Postman_Problem reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Felix QW (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Too many capital letters
Hello. Please look at this edit and some of my other recent edits of pages you've worked on. You're using too many capital letters. WP:MOS forbids capitalizing an initial letter merely because it's part of a section title or an article title. Generally the first letter of the title is capital except when there is some special reason for lower case, and other initials are in lower case except when there is a reason to use a capital, such as the name of a person or a place, etc. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I will stop capitalizing the words except for the first word. WalkingRadiance (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of physical quanties and units
Hello, WalkingRadiance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of physical quanties and units, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lollipop chart


Hello, WalkingRadiance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lollipop chart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  12:46, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of physical quanties and units


Hello, WalkingRadiance. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of physical quanties and units".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 19:59, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Multivariate Poisson distribution
Hi WalkingRadiance,

No hard feelings, but I've reverted your recent edit on the multivariate Poisson distribution -- the reason for this being that there is no such thing as a multivariate Poisson distribution. Any random vector whose components are Poisson-distributed could be called a "multivariate Poisson distribution", and the source you cited talks about multivariate generalizations of the Poisson distribution. In what you wrote and in the graphs you added, it is not clear what generalization is considered. If you are simply talking about a tuple of independent Poisson distributions, then that is not an interesting generalization. I can see you put some work in your edit and that is why I am writing this message, but in its current form the edit does not add anything valuable to the article and that is why I am reverting it.

Best, Malparti (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2023 (UTC)


 * For more details on Mathematica's implementation of a multivariate form of the Poisson distribution, see the Background and context section of the documentation for MultivariatePoissonDistribution. WalkingRadiance (talk) 23:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)