User talk:Walkingcod

February 2008
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references.
 * I added no content, so no source was needed --Walkingcod (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes you did: here you reinserted the unsourced sentence "In January 2006, the organization expanded its ministry to radio with a daily two-hour talk show, Way of the Master Radio."

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits.
 * I did not delete content, just moved it for the purpose of maintaning a Neutral point of view which is a fundamental Wikipedia principle. NPOV is absolute and non-negotiable especially for biographies of living people.--Walkingcod (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Your moves had nothing to do with "maintaning[sic] a Neutral point of view". Please read WP:LEAD: "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should establish context, summarize the most important points, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and briefly describe its notable controversies, if there are any." [My emphasis] That Barton's work has been widely criticised and widely described as pseudohistory is a "notable controversy". Also his affiliation with the Providence Foundation is neither a "publication" nor a "criticism" but a biographical fact -- so belongs in the biography section. HrafnTalkStalk 02:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. HrafnTalkStalk 03:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Most of your contributions about David Barton appear to be destructive. If you have an axe to grind against him, I sugest you do it in a blog.--Walkingcod (talk) 02:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That Barton's work has been widely described as pseudohistory is a verifiable fact. If you don't like wikipedia policy, then you're welcome to find yourself another wiki. HrafnTalkStalk 02:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Components of US money supply (currency, M1, M2, and M3) since 1959.png
Thanks for uploading File:Components of US money supply (currency, M1, M2, and M3) since 1959.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Components of US money supply (currency, M1, M2, and M3) since 1959.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Components of US money supply (currency, M1, M2, and M3) since 1959.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Please don't worry about this message. I have completed the attribution and transferred the file to Wikimedia Commons. On that note, you can always use files from Commons over here too, because Commons is the central file repository for all Wikipedia projects. Just link the file from Commons as you would do with an image that is hosted here at Wikipedia. Regards, De728631 (talk) 14:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)