User talk:Wallco87

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Budweiser (Anheuser-Busch) appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. 'The two sites you 'quote' are basically blogs collecting the opinions of non-experts. Find an expert saying what you want to say instead. Also, the only two Bud flavors on your '50 worst' list are two that nobody's ever heard of!' CliffC (talk) 13:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
I think it is an interesting point to note that amongst the review websites Budweiser products have low standings. Considering the popularity of Budweiser in the market it is surely interesting for people to see that Budweiser products are very poorly recieved when reviewed by people familiar with beer tasting. There is unfortunatly no Rotten tomatoe style site that is composed of professional beer writers therefore it is only possible to gain the aggregate score on a website like Beer Advocate. These are like I said the two most prominant sites with beer advocate recieving 10 million site views a month. The people reviewing on Beer advocate and Rate beer cannot be said to all be involved in the industry in a way that would make them bias. The opinion of one blogger may be innapropriate but the opinion of 325'000 members must be worth something.With regards to the list of the worlds worst beer,no less than 8 of the products in the top 50 are Budweiser((Anheuser-Busch) products.