User talk:WallyFromColumbia

Lackawanna Cut-Off
Bravo on creating a separate article, Lackawanna Cut-Off (NJ Transit), for the rail restoration efforts. I fully support the move.Martindelaware (talk) 10:26, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * :-)WallyFromColumbia (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Question: Your article about the Lackawanna Cutoff - Lubber Run Fill mentions a dam creating lake Lackawanna north of the fill. Google Maps shows Lackawanna Lake SOUTH of the fill with Dallis Pond NORTH of the fill. YutchAdams (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Good point. There's a separate dam that creates Lake Lackawanna, but that's not associated with the Cut-Off.  I'll make that correction.  WallyFromColumbia (talk) 15:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Waterloo Village
Please kindly add any comments here...

Rockaway Valley Railroad
Please kindly add any comments here... The photo of the Morristown and Erie Railway right of way does not reflect the original construction by Melick. The entire line from Whippany to Morristown was rebuilt in the three years following the opening of the railroad, using a new grade and alignment. In this case, the M&E gave up a very curvy but low grade route by the river for a much straighter, but more heavily graded route running behind todays Morris County Mall. Apparently the route by the river was so curvy and poorly built that it created operational problems. Little, if any, of the original Whippany River Railway alignment is in use today. See People Paper and Profits, the story of a Unique NJ SHort Line, published in the 1960's by T Tabor III.

I can send you photos of some RVRR artifacts that I have if you would ever want to see them.

Gerry


 * Thanks, Gerry, that would be great if you could send that info. It's true that the photo is of a rebuilt section, although the intent was to show how a "Melick section" of track might look.  If you feel that the caption could be improved, please feel free to do so.  WallyFromColumbia (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Cutoff overpass for L&NE ROW
That's a nifty photo. Thanks for uploading it. Choess 20:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Wally From Columbia (NJ) (talk) 12:12, 24 August 2010 (UTC)== Paulins Kill now a Featured Article == As of a few moments ago, Paulins Kill was promoted to Featured Article status. I just wanted to thank you for your contributions to and suggestions for improving the article over these past few months and that I appreciate your help in bringing this article to notice as a Featured Article. Once again, thank you, and keep up the good work. &mdash;ExplorerCDT 22:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Photo use?
Hi Wally from Columbia. Just double checking regarding the photo of the Steamtown excursion atop the Tunkhannock Creek Viaduct at the article Steamtown National Historic Site. You indicate that you were the copyright holder to the photo, and you have released it to the public domain. Is that correct? If that is accurate, then there is no problem using it in another publication. (Still, if you would like photo credit, we may be able to accommodate that. No handles or user names, though.) Also, do you know what year that photo was taken? Steamtown excursions ran over the viaduct only from 1989 to 1993 -- although another one is scheduled to happen on 9 September 2007. Please reply on my talk page. Thanks —  Michael J (talk) 20:56, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Wally From Columbia (NJ) (talk) 12:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scranton (NJT station)


The article Scranton (NJT station) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unconfirmed, proposed rail station

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 23:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

The recent Lackawanna Cut-Off articles
I'll put this as mildly as I can. I love the fact that you've done us a favor an introduced the articles on this stuff. However, there also comes a point where having the article versus having a stubby article with numerous errors. I realize you're new to the site, and can give you definitely a chance to make some good work. However, just as a suggestion, until we can figure this out, I'd offer to stop making articles on the LCO for a while, since I just did a number to East Stroudsburg's. Hope you don't mind it too much. Mitch32(Transportation Historian) 20:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Galleries at Lackawanna Cut-Off
Hi Wally. There are still too many images on the Lackawanna Cut-Off article. Galleries are not meant to be used to cram additional images into an article. Wikipedia is not Wikimedia Commons, which is meant to display galleries of a specific topic. Do you think you could trim quite a few images out and put most of them back in the text? Just try to keep them from being directly opposite from one another. For example, I've always wondered why File:November 2006 - 2 047.jpg was in the article at all. I realize it's valuable to show the original map, but the shadows detract from the image so much that it makes it confusing. It might also be a good idea to trim the captions. Manual of Style (captions) may be helpful in guiding that process. Thanks for your attention to these points. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lackawanna Mainline - west of NJ Cut-Off
Template:Lackawanna Mainline - west of NJ Cut-Off has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Rail advocacy organizations based in New Jersey
Category:Rail advocacy organizations based in New Jersey, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Dispute resolution
Hi Wally. I noticed you added another new image to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article. I still think this is an abuse of the gallery script (and I have new concerns about your captions - specifically the original research contained within them). I thought we could try out the new dispute resolution page to resolve our difference of opinion on this. Please join me here for a discussion: Dispute resolution noticeboard. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 03:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Overlinking
Hi, Wally, and thanks as always for your work on the Lackawanna Cut-Off article. I think you may be misunderstanding slightly the use of links, and are therefore Overlinking. General practive is to link only the first instance of a word in an article; for example, the first reference to New Jersey would be linked, while the second reference to New Jersey would not. As well, very common items are not liked; these generally include years and thinks like cars and trucks whose articles are unlikely to have any pertinent information about the linking article. Cheers. PRRfan (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Nicholson-Viaduct.JPG needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Nicholson-Viaduct.JPG appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Rockport Wreck scene after clean-up looking east - June 1925.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rockport Wreck scene after clean-up looking east - June 1925.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Rockport Wreck plaque - IMG 5424.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rockport Wreck plaque - IMG 5424.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Rockport Wreck - showing wrecked engine 1104.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rockport Wreck - showing wrecked engine 1104.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lackawanna Cut-Off in New Jersey Map - Feb 2012.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lackawanna Cut-Off in New Jersey Map - Feb 2012.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lackawanna Cut-Off Map.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lackawanna Cut-Off Map.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Dear Stefan, Stefan2 (talk) why did you proceed with the deletion of this file over the objections that I raised? I believe you totally misunderstood the conditions under which the file was created. The file was not "derived from a computer screen". The map was created by me ON a computer screen and then photographed. Please kindly explain as to why the copyright of such an image would possibly belong to anyone other than myself? As a result, I would propose to re-introduce this image for use.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 13:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Vail Fill - Lackawanna Cut-Off - Dec 1 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vail Fill - Lackawanna Cut-Off - Dec 1 2012.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Vail Fill - Lackawanna Cut-Off - Dec 1 2012.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Vail Fill - Lackawanna Cut-Off - Dec 1 2012.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:31, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I've added the copyright tag. Hopefully that resolves this issue.  If not, please let me know.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 14:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Lackawanna Cut-Off Construction Contractors (1908-11) was accepted
 Lackawanna Cut-Off Construction Contractors (1908-11), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Jamesx12345 18:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Possibly unfree File:Waltz and Reece Fill - April 1910.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waltz and Reece Fill - April 1910.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Construction on Jones Cut in Blairstown NJ - March 23, 1909.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Construction on Jones Cut in Blairstown NJ - March 23, 1909.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Andover-Station-Cut-Off.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:57, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Blairstown Radio Station.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:44, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Centerville and Southwestern Railroad, High bridge.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Columbia NJ Power Dam - April 2011 - IMG 1822.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Canal-Society-of-NJ.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Images at WP:PUF
Wally, I've been reviewing the two images list at Possibly unfree files/2013 November 19 and as the US copyright law stands I can't find a way of making them public domain as unpublished images like these that are works for hire are copyrighted for 120 years from creation. However the one get out might be your statement Perry Shoemaker stating the railroad never claimed copyright on them. Is this doccmented anywhere? If so that might be usable as a release into the public domain. I know it's bizarre but US copyright doesn't realise the concept of no copyright existing other than for federal works. Nthep (talk) 17:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Need to check sources of PV article to which you nicely contributed
Wally, where did you draw most of your material, in Feb 2013, for the extensive beef-up that you did of the Pharmacovigilance article? Am dealing with questions of sourcing of the current article content (tags were added). RSVP at talk, at that article? Leprof 7272 (talk) 13:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Lackawanna Cut-Off Map.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lackawanna Cut-Off Map.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * User:Magog the Ogre, (t • c) I'm afraid that I respectfully disagree. This is not a derivative work, in my opinion.  A 1911 map was used by me to draw a computer image "free hand".  No copyrighted map program was used to draw the image.  The computer image was photographed by me in 1988.  In 2008 it was digitally scanned by me.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Birthplace of the Lackawanna Cutoff (construction)
The Cutoff was built between 1908 and 1911 between Port Morris Junction and Slateford Junction but there's no information on where the Cutoff began construction at, the first spot where the building of the cutoff began, the first spot where trackage was laid. It was built in sections but doesn't have information on which section began construction and completed first. Do you know where (along) the cutoff began construction first and do you know which section/part of the cutoff was completed first?71.188.58.49 (talk) 15:41, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * That's an interesting question, User talk:71.188.58.49. The project was divided up into seven sections, and comprehensive information on when each section was completed doesn't exist in the records I've seen thus far.  It is thought that this information would have been in the chief engineer's files, but those documents probably left the railroad when the chief engineer, Lincoln Bush, left the DL&W in 1912 to join the construction company of David W. Flickwir, which would became Flickwir & Bush.  I'm presently going through the correspondence files of Lackawanna President Wm. Truesdale, and there are limited references to sections of track being laid that I've seen in the files up to mid-1911. Without that "rosetta stone" of information, however, we can only assume that the sections started work in August 1908 and finished up sometime late in 1911.  Ironically, the Flickwir section (Section 3) fell behind and I suspect that Flickwir and Bush had a lot to talk about, which presumably led to Flickwir coaxing Bush to join his company.  If I do undercover more detailed information on this, I'll add it to the construction table.  WallyFromColumbia (talk) 17:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Rockaway Valley Railroad
I want to thank you for the incredible work that you put into this page. As a proud Morris Countian it makes me so happy to see a beautifully written article about something I heard so much about when I was growing up. Thank you for your dedication to the many railroads that used to blanket this area and the many that still do. I hope that you are healthy and safe in these troubling times.

Sincerely, JerseyThroughandThrough (talk) 05:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)


 * JerseyThroughandThrough - Thank you for your kind words!

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lackawanna Cut-Off Restoration Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airo. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Armstrong Cut


The article Armstrong Cut has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Bradbury Fill


The article Bradbury Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Colby Cut


The article Colby Cut has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Jones Cut


The article Jones Cut has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Lubber Run Fill


The article Lubber Run Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Wharton Fill


The article Wharton Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of McMickle Cut (Lackawanna Cut-Off)


The article McMickle Cut (Lackawanna Cut-Off) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Waltz & Reece Cut


The article Waltz & Reece Cut has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Vail Fill


The article Vail Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Slateford Junction


The article Slateford Junction has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The information on the history can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Ramsey Fill


The article Ramsey Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Pequest Fill


The article Pequest Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of North Jersey Rail Commuter Association


The article North Jersey Rail Commuter Association has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. There also is a conflict of interest."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Vail Fill


The article Vail Fill has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The section on construction can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Slateford Junction


The article Slateford Junction has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is not a notable subject, going against WP:GNG, with little significant coverage. The information on the history can go to the Lackawanna Cut-Off article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.