User talk:Walmei

Consensus
Hi, regarding your edits and  to Chemical substance, please see our policy about wp:CONSENSUS. The idea is that, when an edit is reverted, you don't just undo the revert, but you go to the article talk page and discuss with the other contributors, in order to get a consensus. See wp:BRD. I have undone your edit again because I think that content does not belong in that article. Please go to Talk:Chemical substance and open a discussion item there. Cheers. - DVdm (talk) 09:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fundamental question of philosophy


The article Fundamental question of philosophy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Entirely original research, violates WP:SYNTH, WP:OR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CataracticPlanets (talk) 20:10, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Matter (philosophy)‎, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 11:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)