User talk:Walpum

Welcome and suggestions
I saw your expansion of isobutanol. Looks like interesting developments. Although few publications foreshadow commercialization, hope springs eternal.

From the perspective of the entire article, here is another perspective: the isobutanol article is supposed to provide a broad overview of this chemical compound, not just its genetically engineered biosynthesis. Approximately 26,000 reports have been published on isobutanol, including about 120 reviews (according to Chem Abs). So you can appreciate the predicament. One step might be to compress some of the writing or shifting some content to more specialized articles related to biofuels. These ideas are just off the top of my head. Happy editing. --Smokefoot (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2015 (UTC)