User talk:Walshkj/sandbox

Peer Review

Lead - It seems that you have a good start. My only suggestion would be to make it more clear what the focus of your section is. I saw that it will be included on the “Nuclear and Radiation Accidents and Incidents” article and that your section will be on the ecological impacts, but as a section it doesn’t feel as cohesive as the others.

Structure - I think the structure you’ve set up is really good. I like how the article goes from talking about the subject broadly, to discussion specific impacts, to discussing specific incidents. It flows really well.

Balance - Each of the subsections seems to have equal weight, and I think you’ve done a great job of maintaining a neutral tone.

Sources - I saw your note about importing your sources, and I’m sure once you’ve included them, they’ll be sufficient.

Overall, I really liked your article. It’s informative, neutral and has a good flow. My only suggestion is to start off stronger in your lead section.

Elizreece (talk) 22:28, 25 April 2020 (UTC)