User talk:WalterYoung

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Charlie D. Hurt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charlie D. Hurt was changed by WalterYoung (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851736 on 2013-07-03T21:12:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charlie D. Hurt


The article Charlie D. Hurt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG, WP:PROF, and WP:AUTHOR. Largely unsourced BLP, with the few sources given not passing GNG. Google Scholar (under either Charles or Charlie D. Hurt) shows only a single-digit number of publications, with citations too low for PROF #C1. His positions in academic administration never quite reached the level of head of a whole university, so are not enough for PROF #C6. He is the coauthor of the book Scientific and Technical Literature: An Introduction to Forms of Communication but I found no reviews. I did find a couple of reviews of his book Information Sources in Science and Technology, in JSTOR 4309029 and doi:10.1108/cb.2000.19.2.78.2 (the book should not be confused with an earlier one with the same title by Parker and Turley) but I would need multiple reviews of multiple books to convince me of a pass of AUTHOR. With only a single reviewed book as evidence of notability, we could have a redirect to an article about the book (if anyone cared enough to make an article on the book) but it's not enough to convey notability to its author."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:11, 26 July 2020 (UTC)