User talk:Walter Baltensperger

HiAccdude92 (talk) 16:01, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Image = Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg
Hi, it looks like you created an article, Image = Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg some time after uploading File:Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg. Did you mean to create it under another name, or was it an accident? By the way, a somewhat belated welcome to Wikipedia! &mdash; thank you for contributing! Feezo (Talk) 12:47, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Dear Feezo, I wanted to upload File:Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg just once with this name. I acted twice, because first I did not know the licence tag for something that is free and open to all (self made in 2002 and unpublished). Can I see it? Somehow I got on an image editing page of my sandbox, but the picture did not show. I intend to add a missing chapter to the (well written) article "Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis". Thank you for your help. Walter Baltensperger 13:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I saw your comment here earlier, and then later on my user page. (Discussion really belongs on user talk pages, like this one). I didn't quite get your meaning though; the image file looks fine, so you should be able to add it to Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis whenever you want. Feezo (Talk) 13:02, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Feezo, I am glad to know that you saw the picture. However, it does not appear on my sandbox. I would like to adjust its size and caption before I add it to the article. How can I see the picture?Walter Baltensperger 13:25, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see; you used Image = Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg... &mdash; the syntax is [[Image:Poleshift-Spiral-WBN.jpg... More information is at [[Wikipedia:Images. Feezo (Talk) 17:42, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi Feezo, Thank you! Now it works.Walter Baltensperger 22:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis
Hello... if I'm reading it correctly, the material you posted to Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis "has not been discussed in publications of the scientific community". If so, we should probably not be presenting it in an article. Could you please discuss it on the talk page, along with a link to the version in your userspace? Thanks in advance. --Ckatz chat spy  10:46, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi Ckatz, The existing article "Cataclysmic poleshift hypothesis" is well written, but a piece is missing: "What are the physical conditions for a cataclysmic poleshift?" For this part textbooks of classical mechanics and a research paper from Nature (1955) are cited. The second question "Could a cataclysmic poleshift actually have happened without violating known facts?" has an answer. It is possible, however, only under very special circumstances before the pole shift. It turns out that these circumstances would produce some of the most basic features of the Pleistocene Ice Ages. I have been a physics teacher at ETH in Zurich. I prepared this first contribution of mine to Wikipedia, because I thought it was a pity that the existing article does not mention the physics of a rapid pole shift. The picture of my contribution was prepared in 2002. If there is a legal problem, I can quote a refereed paper, which contains most of this story. Walter Baltensperger 14:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * }
 * Hello again &mdash; you can notify users that you left a new message for them here by putting on their talk page. (Otherwise they'll probably only see it if they happen to be watching your talk page.) As long as you own the content you're contributing, there should be no legal problems. Citing sources is generally recommended, but not absolutely necessary. There's a neat utility at http://toolserver.org/~magnus/makeref.php that makes it easy to format references. By the way, it's really great to have you on board &mdash; Wikipedia always needs more subject matter experts. Feezo (Talk) 21:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * But please read WP:NOR carefully. You can't add your own research directly. Has it been published and if so where? Dougweller (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Now I have read the policy instructions and I came to the conclusion that I better desist. I shall not use my contribution. The situation has a singular aspect. The article "Cataclysmic pole shift hypothesis" does not mention the physics of a rapid pole shift. However, to my knowledge the only persons that work on this at present are Willy Woelfly and myself, two retired physicists from the ETH in Zurich. Therefore, if we contribute something on this, then it is both our own stuff and research. Therefore we better desist. I enjoyed the contact with the Wikipedia community. Walter Baltensperger 12:12, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You have no idea how nice it is when someone responds as you have. Too often we get called all sorts of names, legal threats, etc. Thanks for your cooperation. Dougweller (talk) 12:53, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, very nice indeed. Thank you as well. FYI, you might wish to consider posting on the article's talk page; explain your situation, and link to the discussions you have had regarding this. Then, other (uninvolved) editors can review the material and see if and/or how it can be incorporated. You can also contribute to the discussion, and of course edit any other subject on the site. --Ckatz chat spy  21:59, 7 January 2011 (UTC)