User talk:Walterkoch

Welcome...

Hello, Walterkoch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Opus 113 (talk) 21:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC) --Opus 113 (talk) 21:26, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Ro Hancock-Child
It is unusual for a brand-new user to head directly for a particular article and revert a series of recent edits - may I ask what, if any, relationship you may have to the subject of the article? Thanks in advance. JohnInDC (talk) 21:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ro Hancock-Child. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the response, but you didn't answer my question - are you a friend or colleague of Ms. Hancock-Child?  As to the rest - well, certainly you have the right to edit articles, as does any Wikipedia editor; but all editing has to take place within the bounds of Wikipedia policy, and a lot of work on that article seems to fall well outside it.  The edits which concern you largely reflect the efforts of other, more experienced editors to bring the article in line with those policies.  It is not in the least bit personal - in apparent contrast, I might add, to many of the original contributions.  In that regard, here are a few of those policies you might read as you begin your Wikipedia career:  WP:Notability, WP:Reliable sources, WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:Puffery, and WP:NPOV.  Thanks.  JohnInDC (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ro Hancock-Child for deletion
The article Ro Hancock-Child is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ro Hancock-Child until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnInDC (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)