User talk:Wanderer57/storagexx

Rough draft

 * Thank for the inputs. I think we need to consider our "process"  before trying to sort out these three sentences.  Here is my review of earlier discussion:
 * Thank for the inputs. I think we need to consider our "process"  before trying to sort out these three sentences.  Here is my review of earlier discussion:


 * There is a note at the top of Talk:Homeopathy: "This is a controversial topic, which may be under dispute. Please read this talk page and discuss substantial changes here before making them."


 * When I pointed this out, I was told "copyedits are not substantial changes".


 * I replied: "In a controversial article such as this one, where there have been huge debates over wording, deletion of three sentences is a substantial change, IMHO."


 * The reply to this, in a talk summary, was: "rv. there's no requirement to gain consensus before edits, and this is well-justified"


 * This talk summary was on an edit that removed the three sentences under discussion. The third such edit within 15 hours.  This even though discussion of the three sentences had started here 6 hours earlier.


 * If I restore the sentences again, I will break the 3 revert rule. I'm not going to do that, partly because of the rule, but mostly because I think it a foolish game.


 * It appears the avowed anti-homeopathy editors outnumber the other editors who have shown interest in this page. Should decisions be a  question of who can muster the most reverts, or should we discuss changes?  If it is based on revert counts, I think the anti-homeopathy editors have more reverts and all others might as well leave.


 * Is this in fact the situation? I think we should try to resolve this in an amicable way.   Opinions please.  Wanderer57 06:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * P.S. I am NOT pro-homeopathy, though some people may get that impression of me in comparison to the strong anti-homeopathy positions around.


 * I do not mean to suggest that all anti-homeopathy editors would play the revert game. There are some whom I am sure would not, as much as I can be sure about anything in Wikipedia.   Wanderer57 06:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)