User talk:Wangmh5

Dear Administrator, My name is Menghan and I am here hoping to seek a solution in order to have a proper and unbiased article about one of our clients:Aspesi. As my colleague (user name: ASPESI) who is currently blocked due to the violation of conflict of interest, he has asked me for help. I understand the COI still exists but I am willing to do whatever it takes to resolve any issues that may occur. We both understand the mistake he had made and it was wrong not to fully understand the rules and act based solely upon assumption. We have reviewed the rules again and really hope the past mistake can be fixed. In order to show the good faith, I propose the content as the following:


 * [Promotional content removed]]

Please let me know if this revision is acceptable. Thank you very much for your time and help. Regards, Menghan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wangmh5 (talk • contribs)


 * Menghan, I have repaired your unblock request - hopefully adequately for you.
 * Secondly, I fear that you do not understand all of the reasons for the block of your "colleague". Not only was their username invalid, but for spamming the encyclopedia.  As you have massive conflict of interest, it is impossible for you to write non-biased, non-promotional "article".  Indeed, your sample above is nothing but an advertisement.  There is nothing that remotely suggests the notability required to be in an encyclopedia.  Remember, this is not a not business directory ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that your only purpose in editing Wikipedia is to promote your client, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, it is clear that this account exists to evade the effect of a block on another account. (You may find it helpful to read the policy on Meatpuppetry.) If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.