User talk:Wangyaqing7

Welcome!
Hello, Wangyaqing7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Non-Dropframe   talk   16:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   16:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning
Hello Wangyaqing7,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Optimistic knowledge gradient policy for optimal budget allocation in crowdsourcing
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Optimistic knowledge gradient policy for optimal budget allocation in crowdsourcing, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://jmlr.org/papers/v16/chen15a.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:18, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Optimistic knowledge gradient policy for optimal budget allocation in crowdsourcing


A tag has been placed on Optimistic knowledge gradient policy for optimal budget allocation in crowdsourcing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://jmlr.org/papers/v16/chen15a.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 23:26, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning


A tag has been placed on Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/saberian14a.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 23:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Statistical Decision Making for Optimal Budget Allocation in Crowd Labeling
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Statistical Decision Making for Optimal Budget Allocation in Crowd Labeling, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://jmlr.org/papers/v16/chen15a.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:44, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Statistical Decision Making for Optimal Budget Allocation in Crowd Labeling


A tag has been placed on Statistical Decision Making for Optimal Budget Allocation in Crowd Labeling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://jmlr.org/papers/v16/chen15a.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:45, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Crow  Caw 00:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of FCBoost for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FCBoost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FCBoost until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 02:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning


The article Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable algorithm. Proposed in a single paper that has only been cited once, according to Google scholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 03:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Boosting Algorithms for Detector Cascade Learning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Non-Dropframe   talk   03:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fast cascade boosting algorithms


A tag has been placed on Fast cascade boosting algorithms requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. freshacconci talk to me  04:12, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Heimanba823. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:33, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * If this is the case then you might be able to be unblocked. However here are some issues:
 * First is that what you've been doing is adding articles that are closely paraphrased from papers released in a specific journal. This is considered to be a copyright violation and is not acceptable on Wikipedia. In school terms this is considered to be plagiarism since this is pretty much not your original work.
 * The second issue is that once people kept deleting the pages you kept re-adding them. At some point it would have been a good idea to stop and ask why these were being deleted and what other measures could be done. I do see where you did try to ask questions, but only after you repeatedly re-added the material to Wikipedia, either as a new page or as part of a pre-existing article. At one point you did try to ask User:I dream of horses on their talk page, but quickly removed the remark- this is actually what you should have been doing in the first place.
 * The third issue is that one person has brought up concerns that these new theories are not notable at this point in time, at least not enough to where they'd merit a mention or entry on Wikipedia. They have to have coverage outside of the people proposing the new theories, as you need to be able to show how this content is notable outside of their creators. Things do not immediately become notable by merit of existence.
 * If I unblock you I have some requirements.
 * That you only create articles via AfC. This would give you more time to improve the pages at AfC if they're declined, plus you would still be able to show work to your instructor.
 * That you not add anything to the pre-existing articles like you did with edits like this one. People make new theories all the time and they're not always notable, so I'd instead recommend that you first get help via the WP:TEAHOUSE or from WikiProject Computer Vision or WikiProject Robotics prior to making these edits. Also, do not cut/paste the content from the articles that have been deleted since that will put WP:UNDUE weight in the article and that poses a copyright concern.
 * Finally, please do not post copyrighted materials to the article. Copyright is taken seriously on Wikipedia and since this is for a classroom assignment, there's an even bigger concern that your teacher might not accept this work if it's not in your own words. There's also an issue of tone, since research papers can sometimes contain personal opinions or even a personal bias. There's nothing wrong with this in research papers per se, but we can't have that on Wikipedia. This is part of the reason why it's so important to write stuff in your own words.
 * If you agree to this and can get the others to agree to the same thing on their talk pages, I will unblock all of the accounts aside from the new account created by Heimanba823. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:03, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I will, however, e-mail you a copy of the deleted articles for you to rewrite at AfC. If the papers were ever released as open source that might make things easier, depending on what license they used. Some have released their papers as fair use, but not as completely fair use (ie, that they can be rephrased however, etc). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm... looks like you don't have email enabled. I'll see if any of the other accounts do. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:19, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

In addition to 's excellent advice above, I would recommend that your professor have a look at Wikipedia's guidelines for school and university projects. An assignment to "read a paper and create a Wikipedia page for it" is doomed to failure unless other guidelines are given as well. If your professor will read through the indicated guidelines, they might be able to offer better Wikipedia-related assignments. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I would have been seriously inclined to refuse unblock had Tokyogirl79 not given the detailed exposition above. I assume that you will follow here instructions, as it seems unlikely that you will otherwise achieve unblock. Enabling e-mail is simple; it is an option in "preferences", at the top of the page.
 * I may be misinterpreting an earlier (now deleted) comment of yours; are there several different people all being tasked with creating an article on the same subject? because if so it is likely that only the first article (if any) will survive here, the others being deleted as being articles about a subject where an article already exists. If I have misunderstood then OK, ignore this point.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:14, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Anthony, initially I wasn't inclined to unblock but I have had some experience with students that were sent to Wikipedia by professors who weren't overly familiar with how Wikipedia works and/or has given the students little to no instruction on the whole editing process, which can result in copyright violations and other problems. (Wangyaqing7, I don't mean this as an insult to your professor, just that this happens quite a bit and is usually unintentional on the part of the professor.) Basically at this point all I need is for you to respond that you understand what I've written above and that you will follow my requests and I (or someone else) will unblock you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:34, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not being difficult, and as you are aware did not decline unblock. But we must have a response to your post within a reasonable time frame. Another three says, say? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Anthony Bradbury, I think that's reasonable. I didn't mean to scare them away, but I also didn't want them to go back to doing what they were doing. BTW, when did they say you were being difficult? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Tokyogirl79 they did not say I was being difficult; I just felt that perhaps it might appear that I was being so.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:24, 26 June 2015 (UTC)