User talk:Wantsvictory

You see here examples of Nagging West Coast Liberals Getting Their Way!!!!
Below you examples of what happens when someone inserts a right of FAR FAR left edits into a wikipedia article. I'm guessing Sephy-'back'stabbity complained to her buddy "AniMate". Animate's political agenda kicked into high gear, and she left this "final warning" and threat of banishment from wikipedia. Only problem is in her rush to take care of this she forgot that no warnings had been given before. Plus as you examine Animate you find that she actively voiced objections to the passing of Prop8, which goes against the leftist agenda. See how they silence those who disagree. Somebody should block her from posting. I have inserted my own commentary into their rants. Guess they didn't like that because Sephy 'back' stabbity made some additional comments on here to further insult me. Oh well, all is fair I guess-wantsvictory-

I do not care about your personal views about homosexuality. However, this is a professional encyclopedia (it's really a database of false assumptions, but please go on with your rant), and so, please stop changing the words "lesbian relationship" to "twisted lesbian relationship" and "disturbing lesbian relationship" in the "Olivia Spencer" article. If you want to play, go play in the sandbox (((was that an attempt to insult me, or make me feel small, oh no))). Thank you. (No playing here, just trying to make you see it for what it is, sorry your political views can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with you) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sephy-Stabbity (talk • contribs) 02:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

This is your user page. Whatever you decide to edit, and no matter what you add to my nagging posts, it only reflects on you, so play on by all means. (Ah, did I hurt you?) Just call this a response to your liberal tirade. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.63.226.144 (talk) 17:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
This is the final warning((it was the only warning you gave me, so this too is inaccurate)) you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to the fictional lesbian character Olivia Spencer. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. (OH NO HOW WILL LIFE GO ON???)   AniMate   03:12, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * My political beliefs have nothing to do with this. Please read our policy on writing from a neutral point of view (yeah right!).  AniMate   06:16, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 06:08, 7 March 2010 (UTC)  (you should get a real job first, there is no way I'd ever ask for my so called "priviledges" back I am fine without them. ))

WOW a bit over the top don't you think?

ah, Nice!!!! I've been banned. So afraid is Wikipedia of a right wing point of view that they have banned me. Need I point out to you that I WAS ATTACKED FIRST!!!!!! That stephy person made her little comment about playing in the sandbox, so sorry if I defended myself. What did Animate go get you so this could look unbiased? LOL, yeah like you just stumbled on this page and "took some action". LOL@this. I didn't know that a talk page couldn't be moved into an article page, and if you aren't supposed to do it why does it let you. Animate you must be watching me like a Hawk, well sister go right ahead and watch.... as for Jeske, Maybe you should have taken a harder look at this before you jumped the gun, but what ever. It cracks me up the way this site talks about its integrity, when in academics this whole thing is a joke. We are warned in college not to pull sources from this garbage, so what does it matter. It's not like it's world book or anything. anyway. I'm off to bed now, gotta get up early and go play in my sandbox (that one's for you Stephy).

Good night.
 * Do not edit others' comments, Wantsvictory. There is a block option to revoke a user's talk page privileges, and admins are not averse to using it to stem a blocked user's disruption. The issue isn't with your personal views, but rather the fact you're attempting to force them into an encyclopedia that is supposed to be neutral and attacking those whom are reverting it. Neutral point of view is not negotiable. My political leanings, orientation, and the like are not involved in this - I blocked you based upon a read of your contributions. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 21:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Well I beg to differ Jeske, for one thing I stopped editing the pages mentioned after animate gave me the warning, so I don't know where you little ban comes from. You know what it's a free world buddy! The reason you edited my comments is because they are true. So afraid of the truth here that you continue to egg this one. As for attacking those who revert it, I was attacked first friend with that little sandbox comment up there. So sorry you don't like my response!

Have a nice day!
 * You don't have a "free world" on a privately-owned website. Also, would you mind reading the whole comment rather than cherry-picking bits of it? I blocked you based on 'the totality of your contributions. I also banned you because I have no life of my own. The sandbox comment was no insult or personal attack (although it would have helped had he linked to the sandbox, which I suppose proves you are right and this was an insult, otherwise they would have linked to it.). —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v Dittobori ) 23:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey so I don't have free speech, fine, but you can leave me a link with the "n" word and the "b" word in it. Say what you want about everything I've said, but I never directed anyone to a racist site. This says a whole lot about wikipedia. I invite anyone reading to check Jeske's link for the sandbox and see what he sent me too. I didn't cherry pick anything, I believe it was you who cherry picked, and now you send me to a racist site. Thanks, could have done with out that!

Just checked it again, it's already been taken down, but check this history if you don't believe me, it was there. Also I'd like to point out, before certain others try to make the claim, it was not I who made the comments on the sandbox, because I have been banned. Speaking of the ban Jeremy, you missed the part where she tried to patronize me by telling me to go play in the sandbox, it was meant as an insult, on your cherry pick your own facts to suit you, as did animate in my opinion.