User talk:Wanxialiao

Welcome!

Hello, Wanxialiao, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wanxia Liao&, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Chzz  ► 00:38, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Please don't delete my article. I believe there are very strong reasons for people to notice my human rights cases, since they concern many fundamental issues of a democratic society.

I am also trying to improve it.

Deletion
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~


 * The article was a copyright violation, almost word for word from this. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too biased to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.


 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines. It is now wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have proper references. Although you gave case numbers, all that confirms it that there are court cases, not that what is being claimed is true.


 * Your external links are not independent verifiable sources. The first triggered a WOT suspect site, the second had nothing about the issue, and the third was a blog repeating the first.


 * Your text is not neutral. It is full of unsourced claims lacking verifiable in-line references. Your first paragraph is potentially libellous, since it accuses Waterhouse of criminal actions. If he is convicted, you can say that, but not just make an unsupported assumption of guilt. Cahill, Strojin and even the judge are similarly accused of illegality, perjury, deceit or incompetence.


 * This isn't an encyclopaedia article, it's an unsourced, one-sided rant. Incidentally, before you add me to the conspiracy, note that I'm not Canadian or American, and my only concern is that Wikipedia isn't used as a soapbox by everyone who has an axe to grind.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)