User talk:Waqbi

HRW
Hi, sorry for not noticing your edits on my talk page. Wikipedia does not generally accept copyrighted material unless there is no alternative available. Please stop inserting large amounts of copyrighted material without discussion on the talk page. This is an article that many editors have worked on for a long time, I don't own it! Thanks. Mostlyharmless 23:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Talk about what you are trying to do at Talk:Human Rights Watch, so we can figure out what's appropriate and work it in. &mdash;Ashley Y 23:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Smsarmad. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Raheel Sharif‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. S M S  Talk 20:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Raheel Sharif. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. S M S  Talk 09:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Raheel Sharif. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. S M S   Talk 10:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

WP:PAK
 Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * You can give your input at project's main discussion page and keep it on your watchlist: Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics.
 * You can !vote and work on saving articles that are up for deletion at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Pakistan.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? The assessment department is working on rating the quality of every Pakistan article in Wikipedia.
 * Can you code? The automation department uses automated and semi-automated methods to perform batch tasks that would be tedious to do manually.
 * Please participate in any of our descendant workgroups that might interest you.
 * Add your name in the members at WikiProject Pakistan/Members. There's also a user box template which you can put on your user page to identify yourself as a member: User WikiProject Pakistan

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around! lTopGunl (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. -- S M S   Talk 14:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring at Raheel Sharif
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Raheel Sharif. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report of this case is at WP:AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)