User talk:Warderb01

I am the subject of this article.,K. Lawrence Dunham However I initiated it through a surrogate. I understand no that this is not an appropriate platform for me to use. I am trying ot voluntarily delete if. Thank you.Warderb01 (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to K. Lawrence Dunham, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: K. Lawrence Dunham was changed by Warderb01 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.963298 on 2012-06-30T22:29:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at K. Lawrence Dunham with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  D Big X ray  22:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make an unconstructive edit, as you have done repeatedly at K. Lawrence Dunham, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It has repeatedly been pointed out that the article is not the work of just one author, and repeatedly posting to the article is purely disruptive. Moreover, you are not even the creator of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:56, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I have just seen your message at the top of the page. (If you had posted it in its proper chronological position at the bottom I would have seen it earlier and not given the above warning message.) There are several problems with what you say, the main one being that we have only your word for it that you are K. Lawrence Dunham, and also for the fact that the creator of the article was working for you. I suggest that the best thing to do is to leave it. If nobody raises any objection to the deletion, it will go in a few days anyway. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)