User talk:Warheadsoupersourcandy

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warheadsoupersourcandy/sandbox (December 8)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 16:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Warheadsoupersourcandy/sandbox (January 5)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LukeSurlt c 16:10, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie's Angels. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 20:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard
Please stop. --Onorem (talk) 13:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Warheadsoupersourcandy, can you tell us what you are trying to achieve with your edits? -- The Anome (talk) 14:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Ivan Goff has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ivan Goff was changed by Warheadsoupersourcandy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950069 on 2014-01-16T03:09:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is evident that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia. Some of your edits have looked as though they may have been test edits, some have seemed as though they may have resulted from some kind of failure to understand, some have been outright vandalism, but not one of them has been constructive in any way. Much of what you have written has seemed like nonsense, so that it is impossible to tell what you are trying to do. Your editing simply serves to waste the time of other editors who have to follow you round and clear up the mess you leave, so it is clear that your presence is not benefiting the project. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Warheadsoupersourcandy/sandbox


Hello Warheadsoupersourcandy. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)