User talk:Wariobidness

article on Hammond
As reviewing administrator,  I almost had to delete the article: a good part was copied   from her  web site, and is therefor under copyright protection, owned by either her or her university.

Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously; and does not accept material copied from other sources unless it is in the public domain, or released to us under a free license   (It is, by the way, not necessary for pages to have a notice to be copyright:  everything published on the internet or elsewhere is copyright to the owner of that content unless specified otherwise.)

It might be possible to get permission, but there is no point in doing so--a web site of this sort almost always is unsuitable for WP, because it is usually written as a press release, praising rather than describing the subject and containing material we would not include. It is therefore always better to rewrite. I did that for her list of interests. I did not see the source for the bio, but take care that as you finish it you revise, avoiding not only copying, but no Close paraphrase. If there is, rewrite that part from scratch, changing not just the words, but the arrangement into sentences and the sequence of ideas.

I also added what was necessary to show notability under WP:PROF: her named chair, and the very high citation count.  DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 21 March 2013 (UTC)