User talk:Warnborough

Your edit has been removed or reverted: Warnborough University
It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Casper2k3 10:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Stop removing content from Wikipedia: Warnborough University
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Casper2k3 10:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Warnborough University
Your recent edit to Warnborough University (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Stop vandalising pages: Warnborough University
Please stop. If you continue to blank or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Warnborough University, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Casper2k3 10:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * In the section you are removing, sources have been cited and are correct. --Casper2k3 10:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Final warning - Further vandalism will get you blocked: Warnborough University
This is your last warning. The next time you blank or remove material from a page, as you did to Warnborough University, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Casper2k3 10:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  because of . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. –Larry V (talk &#124; contribs) 10:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

March 2007
Thanks for experimenting with the page Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in our encyclopedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Good Articles are listed at WP:GA. Danski14 17:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Stop vandalizing the Warnborough College talk page
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

You must stop editing other users' comments. I have reverted your last edit because there were too many improper edits made by you for me to properly clean up. If you wish to discuss the issues there, please feel free to do so by adding your thoughts. If you persist in deleting or rearranging other people's comments, I will make a recommendation that you be indefinitely blocked, as your previous block seems not to have made an impression with you.

I want to be clear that my objection to your behavior is not the factual content of your additions. Rather, it is the reckless disregard you show for Wikipedia conventions, etiquette, and especially conflict of interest. --67.188.0.96 19:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

You have been placed on the Conflict of Interest Notice Board
This is important to your future editing abilities on Wikipedia.


 * Please read, understand, and abide by the policies set forth in this article on conflict of interest.
 * Please review and comment if you wish on the entry about your conflict of interest with regard to Warnborough College-related articles on the Conflict of Interest Notice Board. --67.188.0.96 20:06, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Natalie 00:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


 * In response to your email, you have been blocked for one week because you keep editing other people's comments on talk pages, it is says in the above message. When the block expires you are welcome to come back, but if you continue to edit other people's comments, you will be blocked again. Natalie 16:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Your May 3, 2007 edits to Warnborough College
Your additions to this article are not helpful and are a transparent effort to discredit Wikipedia as a means to furthering your own POV. While I sympathize with your frustrations with the inherent problems associated in having an open editing policy, those edits were not germane to the article. Information like that is more suited to the talk page. Please consider your edits more carefully in the future. --67.188.0.96 09:59, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

user page
Your user page was deleted, for blatant advertising i.e. spam. If you recreate the page, in its previous form, it maybe subject to deletion again. Regards. Djegan 16:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. - auburn pilot   talk  19:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Username
I see that your username is the same as Warnborough College. Is this an account shared among different personnel or is this a single user? I'm concerned that that account name may violate the username policy. Please clarify.  Will Beback   talk    23:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * If I don't get an explanation I'll proceed with blocking the account. Please respond.   Will Beback    talk    01:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Dynaflow  babble  01:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
You do not get to simply remove reliably-sourced information from an article simply because you think it is wrong or inaccurate, as you did at St. Theresa's Medical University (St. Kitts) OODA is a reliable source. You need to find and cite to a reliable source contradicting it - and then the information from both sources need to be reflected. Fladrif (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
Blocked for username violation - role account. See WP:USERNAME.  Will Beback   talk    08:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)