User talk:Warnerorama

Blocked You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text  on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
 * 1) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Longhair 05:16, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links.  You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia.  Thanks.   -- Longhair 05:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  -- Longhair 05:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:Stop_hand.png|left|30px]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Scott a warner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  -- Longhair 05:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. Longhair 05:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC) -- Longhair 05:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:Warnerorama, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 07:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)