User talk:Warofdreams/2021

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, that's very kind - I will try to write more over the next couple of months! Warofdreams talk 19:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Nuneaton Telegraph
Hi.

I recently contributed to the infobox template list of UK regional daily newspapers, where I added the Nuneaton Telegraph, but I was quick to see it removed from the list as you called it a 'weekly newspaper', however it is in fact a daily newspaper - albeit without its own page at this moment in time.

Nuneaton's weekly newspaper is actually the Nuneaton News which is only printed and sold on Wednesdays. This is proven on the publisher (Reach plc) 's website just here.

I am currently creating a list of local written media for both Nuneaton and Hinckley, but I have not got around to making it its own dedicated page yet.

A quick look at the PressReader website for the paper, linked here will indeed show the publication is daily (excluding Sundays).

I have no objection to it being re-added once it has its own Wikipedia entry if that works for you.

Kind regards, Pokkeballs17 (talk) 13:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for following up on this, I did a cursory search and thought it was a weekly, but you're quite right, it is a daily - albeit an edition of the Coventry Telegraph. In general, where a newspaper has multiple editions, it's only listed once on the template (e.g. The [Sheffield] Star and The [Doncaster] Star, or the various local editions of the North West Evening Mail, but this is a little different as the editions have different titles.  There's definitely a case that all three editions should be listed, or that only one should be.  Either way, I think that the titles of the various editions should redirect to the Coventry Telegraph article as there's unlikely to be enough to say about them to merit their own articles. Warofdreams talk 15:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:30, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Pattern Weavers' Society
Hello, in this edit you added a category Category:Trade unions based in West Yorkshire but I can find no information in article of a West Yorkshire connection. The only location mentioned is Cumberworth in Lincolnshire. Can you shed any light on this? Keith D (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking, the location needed disambiguating - it was based in Upper Cumberworth in West Yorkshire, as the street name demonstrates. Warofdreams talk 22:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying. Keith D (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

"♀" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ♀. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 10 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 09:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Third Reich expeditions
Hi! Recently I came across a request for an article (or articles) on the expeditions of the Third Reich. I intended to create a German Antarctic Expedition (1938–1939) article. After reading your rather copious paragraph about it in your article New Swabia I wonder if this is really necessary. Would you agree, that I simply create one article for all (three relevant) Third Reich expeditions? All the best Wikirictor talk • contribs 19:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi again! I noticed, that an article for the Third Reich Tibetan expedition exists already. That means we need two more - one for the Antarctic Expedition (i made it already) - and one for the Amazon expedition. I included a paragraph of your article New Swabia into the Antarctic Expedition article (Geographic features mapped by the expedition), which i thought is great. I hope you are fine with that. If not, please let me know. All the best Wikirictor talk • contribs 10:18, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update, the new articles look excellent and if some part of my very old contribution is useful I'm very happy with that! Warofdreams talk 15:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your help. Please also let me know, if i can help you (i am German native speaker). All the best Wikirictor talk • contribs 08:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of English People's Liberation Army for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article English People's Liberation Army is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/English People's Liberation Army until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Kusma (t·c) 20:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Independent Green Voice for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Independent Green Voice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Independent Green Voice& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. doktorb wordsdeeds 08:10, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raving Loony Green Giant Party


A tag has been placed on Raving Loony Green Giant Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. doktorb wordsdeeds 04:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Raving Loony Green Giant Party for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raving Loony Green Giant Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raving Loony Green Giant Party& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. doktorb wordsdeeds 17:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Some falafel for you!

 * Many thanks, the tastiest award I've received! Warofdreams talk 20:30, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Fourth International
I have nominated Fourth International for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  03:42, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Women in Europe contest now with centenarians
Hi there, Warofdreams, and thanks for participating in the contest. You might be interested in covering one or more of the centenarians in 's detailed redlist. We have decided to target them for the remainder of the contest as all but one are from Europe. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Request for input
Hello, hope all is well. Are you able to comment at an open BN thread? –xenotalk 02:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the prompt, sadly I've been without internet for a few days, so I didn't make it along in time. Warofdreams talk 21:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Organized labour project
Thank you for earlier joining the Organized Labour project. I've been a participant in the project since 2006 and am helping with a revival of it. As part this we are introducing a new membership system, which will help with communications among participants. This involves creating a membership file for each participant within your user space (you can see an example of my membership card here: User:Goldsztajn/WikiProjectCards/WikiProject Organized Labour). This system is already in operation within a number of wikiprojects (such as Women in Red and Medicine). You will not have to do anything, myself or someone else from the project will create the relevant file within your userspace. However, I am conscious that it is impolite to change an editor's userspace without notice. If I don't hear from you in the negative, I will go ahead with making the change in the next two weeks. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Many thanks for supporting the project, in solidarity,--Goldsztajn (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Congrats on the Keyboard picketing award!

 * Many thanks, an award I will be proud of! I signed up for WP:LABOR way back in 2006, and haven't really been active there, but I'm still finding lots of new aspects of the labour movement to write about. Warofdreams talk 01:18, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

"Adoptive parent" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Adoptive parent. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Workers Resistance (Ukraine)
I have quite a wry smile on my face at the moment, having just discovered you created this article back in 2005. I wonder, were you aware of the role of a certain Ukrainian wrestling fan and the yahoo group Leftist Trainspotters in that saga? Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Excellent, I've not thought about that article for a long time, but yes, I was a member of the Leftist Trainspotters group back then and that'll be where I first heard the story! Warofdreams talk 22:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I suspect we probably crossed paths under different noms de plume! There's a few other former trainspotters on Wikipedia I've come across over the years, nice to meet you again! Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Minster Yard/Minster Court
Wondering if you have any insight as to whether 1–3 Minster Court were previously the same numbers on Minster Yard at some point. I'm not seeing any evidence of 1–3 Minster Yard in my Google searches. It just seems weird that the numbers of Minster Yard seem to begin at 4. British History has been helpful up till now, but isn't clarifying this issue, if there even is one. To muddy the waters even more, the Minster website lists Treasurer's House as being 2 Minster Yard. - Seasider53 (talk) 00:37, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

It's a great question, and harder to answer than I expected. In the 1850s, the street still didn't have an official name, though it was generally referred to as Minster Yard. There's no evidence the buildings were numbered at the time, either. By the start of the 20th-century, the buildings had been numbered, and Minster Court was a separate street. But I can't find any evidence of the order of these two events. It seems logical that the numbering happened first, but e.g. at Blossom Street, the numbering continues into The Mount despite the change in name. Warofdreams talk 09:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Party name with colour
Template:Party name with colour has been nominated for merging with Template:Party name with color. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:29, 13 December 2021 (UTC)