User talk:Warpozio

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - Lucky 6.9 15:49, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Also, please take a look at the Manual of Style. Thanks!

Record labels
It's good to see your work on record labels! Keep up the good work. Feel free to ask on my talk page if you have any questions I might help with. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:38, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Bang Records
Hi. There is no content to Bang Records beyond a link. It has been tagged for speedy deletion. Is there any more information you can add to save it from deletion? - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:16, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

ARC
Hi. Note that the American Record Company and the American Record Corporation were not the same entity! The second one is the famous ARC. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 00:45, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Yet another hi!
May I again suggest that you sneak a peek over at the manual of style? Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 21:59, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Record Labels
Hi Warpozio - I note you're adding quite a few new entries on record labels. When you contribute one, could you please include the text at the end of the article? This will make sure that the article is grouped in with other labels under Category:Record labels. Cheers! --Rlandmann 22:15, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I especially mean your articles about record labels. [[User:Mike Storm|Mike &infin; Storm]] 22:36, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * I agree. Warpozio, your works are very much welcomed and appreciated, but they need more substance.  Your entry for Kama Sutra Records is a good example of how to do it right.  You should consider a formula that includes the year of the labels' founding, the founding members, important acts, mergers, etc.  Remember, this is a reference work and the more you add, the more your articles can help others.  Keep up the good work, and don't be afraid to leave a note on my talk page.  It's my pleasure to help you.  Best, Lucky 6.9 21:01, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Verb tenses
Hey, War. Whazzup?

Thought I'd drop you a line to say that your record label articles are looking much better. Very interesting stuff given the fact I work in broadcasting. One minor problem: Your verb tenses are backwards. You've been using present-tense verbs to describe past events. Minor quibble, and I'm sure you'll be more careful in the future. Keep those articles coming! - Lucky 6.9 21:57, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Storyville records
Was there a problem with the page I added yesterday? I am a new user and noticed that you have removed the text. Skuma Ironsides 13:08, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Inter-language wiki links
Hi. I notice you removed the interwiki link to the Japanese version on the King Records article. As the Japanese link seems to work (as far as I can tell not knowing that language), I put it back. I'll guess that was just an accident while you were editing the article; if there is a reason to remove the link, please mention the reason on talk. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 22:56, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Canaan
Hi. You added the text "Canaan Records is a subsidiary of Word Records, started in the sixties." to The Winner Records. As far as I know, this isn't relevent, and your text doesn't say how Canaan is connected to The Winner. I'm guessing you accidentally put this in the wrong place? I took that sentence out of the article; if I was wrong, let me know. Best wishes, -- Infrogmation 17:05, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Pye Records
I'm curious as to why you chose to remove the info re: Petula Clark I added to this entry. As important as she was to the label, omitting any mention of her seems strange. I have not only returned the info to the Pye entry, but have enhanced your entry to Polygon Records, as well, since there wasn't much data there. I hope you don't mind! TOM 17:19, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)

Image adjustments
Hi. When rearranging images and updating markup to our more current wiki syntax, please be careful not to loose the captions explaining what the images are! Thanks, -- Infrogmation 01:57, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)

The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

A&M spam
I see you've been cleaning up the format of the external links to the A&M site added by the anon. I think the links should be deleted altogether. All the anon has done is to write a plug for the site and then slap on links to the site's main page. The anon is putting the links in articles for artists whose tangential connection with A&M is long over with; the link is always to the site's main page, not to anything about the artist (at least in the ones I've seen so far); and we don't let a description of an external link include a paragraph plugging the site. There's no reason to keep any of this junk. JamesMLane 18:37, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I was planning to delete the spam links and I just wanted to let you know that you shouldn't waste your time fixing the format. I had to sign off before doing more than a few, though, and when I came back I saw that you'd eliminated the rest of them. Thanks, good work! I left in the one at the A&M Records article but without the puffery. JamesMLane 18:36, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The A&M spammer is back, only this time he seems to have taken to heart a comment I made to him last time. Instead of just slapping on a generic link to his home page, he's tailoring the links to the subjects of the articles. He's still creating some problems. Of the ones I looked at, his addition to Carpenters messed up the previous link, and Word Records had no "External links" section so he made it "See also". I've fixed those. Overall, though, I'm inclined to leave these links in, if the others are like the two I checked. You've done a lot of work on these articles, though, so I wanted to see what you think about it. JamesMLane 18:36, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Don't copy a page to move it
Hi Warpozio,

When you need to move a page, please don't just copy the contents to the new page title, as you did with Seraphin Records → Seraphim Records. Instead, use the "move" tab, which appears next to the "edit this page" tab at the top of the screen.

Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 12:51, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

lots of edits, not an admin
Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) June 28, 2005 04:16 (UTC)

Drum and bass
Hi, I noticed that you do a lot of work creating articles on drum and bass labels. I'm trying to start a Wikiproject to clean up and expand the coverage of this genre - take a look at my user page if you're interested. Cheers! illWill 5 July 2005 11:45 (UTC)

why a seperate Drive-Thru discography?
Hi, I noticed you moved the Drive-Thru release list to a seperate article. I was just wondering why you did this, because I felt it is kind of unnecessary. HarryCane 17:17, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Discographies are not very relevant in articles about record labels (IMHO), as they tell hardly anything about the history of a label. A second reason would be that this can add alot of bloat to articles (imagine someone adding a discography of EMI ;) But as I can understand that some people are interested in reading discograhies I moved it to another document which can be edited as needed. warpozio 10:41, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Rykodisc
Just curious what you meant in the Rykodisc article by "In 2001 their ways parted." Could you be a bit more specific? Thanks -- Dave C. 03:59, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
 * From what I've read Chris Blackwell is no longer linked with Rykodisc. warpozio 09:50, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Record labels
Wikipedia has a strict rule about not simultaneously filing an article in both a parent category and a subcategory of the same parent. Could you please not add Category:Record labels to a category if it's already in Category:Independent record labels, Category:Defunct record labels or a country-specific record labels category? Bearcat 19:55, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

List of independent UK record labels
Hi - Could you explain why you've been deleting some of the town references from List of independent UK record labels? I was putting some effort in yesterday to adding that info, so the page would be useful. mcld 21:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've deleted them because the information is already stated in the article itself. The lists of record labels (List of jungle and drum n bass record labels, List of independent record labels, List of electronic music record labels & List of record labels) all use this same format, if the article is still red-linked then additionional information (website, location, ...) can be placed in the list, otherwise that information is moved to the article itself. It is nothing personal ;). warpozio 06:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks, I see your logic. Personally I think it's particularly useful to have the town info listed - so that someone who wants to know (e.g.) what are the indie record labels in Wales, or Yorkshire, they can glance down the list of towns. Any merit in that? mcld 21:38, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Why did you edit my article on Beserkley Records?
First, the label is defunct... that is why I had it past tense. Secondly, though there are separate articles on The Modern Lovers and their leader, I put the "&" in there to reflect that he was a part of that band, and in fact, that was the name of the act for awhile.
 * Sorry that wasn't very clear to me. If the label is defunct, then it is best to apply the category "defunct label". As no end date was stated nor the defunct category was used it seemed like a typo. warpozio 23:00, 13 November 2005 (UTC)


 * No problem. I don't categorize sometimes. I did add some info on the article, so hopefully that helped. Keep up the good work.Neanderthalprimadonna 13:03, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Corpus Christi Records
Hi Warpozio. Why did you remove the discography from the page? If I formatted the page incorrectly or there is a reason not to post a discography (I have seen them on many other labels) then I would appreciate your pointing me to some templates or existing pages which I can copy. I think the discography is relevant and intend to start pages for some of the bands from there....? Thanks! Savage Pink 12:49, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I would put that discography in a seperate document. warpozio 10:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Equal Vision Records
Hi there. Just wondering why you've edited the Equal Vision Records article from "record label" to "independent record label". Surely a member of the RIAA cannot be considered an independent label? Al Ninio 01:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, it is listed in List of independent record labels, therefore I edited the article to reflect that. warpozio 10:32, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

spinART Records
Hey! I've noticed you do work on record labels, something I wish I could do more on but know next-to-nothing of most of the time. I'm having an issue finding any sort of historical information on spinART Records. Do you know of anything that could be added? Thanks in advance, regardless of if you can offer anything. --badlydrawnjeff 17:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * A lot of information can be found on the net of in books (eg. "The A-Z of record labels" by Brian Southall). warpozio 18:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Acquirecover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Acquirecover.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 06:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Image:Guinness logo.png
I'm afaraid this image is fairuse and therefor not allowed on user pages could you remove it please?Geni 01:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Freakdance.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Freakdance.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 07:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Neurofunk origins and artists
There are two different points of view about the neurofunk subgenre of drum'n'bass. The first is that neurofunk was originated by the Audio Blueprint label. According to this point of view, neurofunk artists are Stakka & Skynet, Teebee, Photek, Black Sun Empire, Gridlok, etc. The second is that neurofunk was originated by Ed Rush and Optical (Virus Recordings label), and that other artists are Cause 4 Concern, Mayhem, Noisia, Phace, Matrix, etc. Please cite sources on the neurofunk talk page to support any arguments. — Anrie Nord 2006-01-31 15:28Z

Image copyright problem with Image:Tigris_Euphrates.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tigris_Euphrates.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 01:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Please check your WP:NA entry
Greetings, editor! Your name appears on List of non-admins with high edit counts. If you have not done so lately, please take a look at that page and check your listing to be sure that following the particulars are correct: Thank you, and have a wiki wiki day! BD2412 T 04:32, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) If you are an admin, please remove your name from the list.
 * 2) If you are currently interested in being considered for adminship, please be sure your name is in bold; if you are opposed to being considered for adminship, please cross out your name (but do not delete it, as it will automatically be re-added in the next page update).
 * 3) Please check to see if you are in the right category for classification by number of edits.

HELP ME OUT!
All of my articles have been marked for deletion within the past two minutes by a vigilante out to delete everything I have written regarding Geykido Comet Records and all of the artists. You have edited these pages before and any help would be MUCH appreciated. Madangry 19:56, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

VWN en WCN
Beste Warpozio,

Al enige tijd is er een Nederlandstalig chapter in oprichting, te vinden op http://nl.wikimedia.org. Dit wordt de Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland (VWN). Je kunt je interesse om lid te worden van deze vereniging hier aangeven.

Deze vereniging gaat eind augustus/begin september een Wikimedia Conferentie in Nederland (WCN) houden, volgend op Wikimania in Boston, gedeeltelijk erop inspelend middels een aantal discussiegroepen. Om iets dergelijks te organiseren is imput erg gewenst. Dus als je wilt meehelpen, of als je interesse hebt om bij een dergelijk evenement aanwezig te zijn, geef dat dan aan op nl.wikimedia. Ik hoop daar snel je imput tegemoet te zien! Met vriendelijke groet, effeietsanders 21:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * 1) Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner  // Tawkerbot2 07:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Concord Records
Why did you kill the official website link on the bottom of the page? Steelbeard1 11:22, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It is allready in the infobox warpozio 11:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC)


 * That makes sense. I've just deleted the outdated Fantasy Records external link as the current external link is already in the infobox.Steelbeard1 16:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Beatles project
Two things, first, welcome to the project! You may want to add your name to the list of participants (I only realised you're in when I saw your userbox). Second, hope you don't mind I restored some of the removed links on Carl Lindstrom Company... with it up for WP:DYK it was important to keep the parlophone link in there... Happy editing! + +Lar: t/c 04:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Westbound Records
Is a record label considered defunct (as you describe it) when it still maintains an official web site? Steelbeard1 11:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I checked the history and it was categorised as defunct in January by Drumsac. Today I just adjusted the tence of the first sentence to reflect that category.warpozio 12:09, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 15:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject The Beatles!
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? - It's all here

See alsos
Hi... I don't think it's a good idea adding "List of xxx label" entries to See Also sections in articles. Why would somebody reading about, say, Rough Trade want to see a list of record labels? And, if they did want such a thing, why not just click on the category at the bottom of the article?

That said... if you are gonna do a large number of semi-mechanical edits, have a look at AWB. It's a real time saver. --kingboyk 16:04, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Page Blanking
On 8-May, you blanked Heritage Records. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. I agree that the original redirect was wrong, but instead of blanking, you should find an alternate target or follow the redirect portion of the deletion procedures. I have redirected this article to BMG Heritage Records which seems a suitable traget. If you have questions, please let me know. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 01:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Credential Recordings
I am wondering why you added this record label to Category:British record labels. The record label is stationed in Nashville, Tennessee, USA. ??? -EdGl 00:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * My mistake, I changed it to Category:American record labels. warpozio 09:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Haha, at first I was thinking "hmm, maybe there's a town called Nashville in the UK somewhere and that's how he got confused." Thanks for the fix. -EdGl 01:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 2, June 2006
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? - It's all here

It's The Phillips Records
In case you hadn't noticed, It's The Phillips Records has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Long talk page
Greetings! Your talk page is getting a bit long in the tooth - please consider archiving your talk page (or ask me and I'll archive it for you). Cheers! BD2412 T 00:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 3, July 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject Linux
A new wikiproject. In case you're interested (you voted on the Linux AID, hence I"m contacting you). - User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:25, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 4, August 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 5, September 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 6, October 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

You helped choose Coffee as this week's WP:AID winner
– ClockworkSoul 04:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Breakbeat Science
I don't think that you were the originator of the copyvio (it was an unregistered user back in 2004 who first did it, and the user could have been from the label itself), but you should have caught it; anyway, the article on Breakbeat Science also flagrantly violated NPOV and was more than three years out-of-date (I could tell because it mentioned Breakbeat Science Exercise.01 as the most recent release and Billion Dollar Gravy as an upcoming release by London Elektricity, when in reality there are at least 4 releases in the Exercise series and London Elektricity has since released a new album. Then again, the "about us" part of the site hasn't been updated since 2003 either.

I certainly hope that you can get some people to improve this article and update it; I love drum+bass, and the Breakbeat Science article doesn't do the label justice.
 * Breakbeat Science ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Julyo 13:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Smalltown Supersound discography
In case you hadn't noticed, Smalltown Supersound discography has been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 21:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Hi there!!!!

This may be the LAST The Beatles project newsletter you receive!

Why? Because we believe you are inactive or possibly inactive. If you want to move yourself back to active, and get copies going forward, please remove your name from WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/PossiblyInactive and add yourself to WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Active. Thanks for your interest in the project. This may be the last notice you will receive, it depends on whim. ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 20:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 10, February 2007
Hi. You are not receiving The Beatles project newsletter because we believe you are inactive. Click the link in the title, above, to see it. If you want to move yourself back to active, and get copies again, please remove your name from WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Inactive and add yourself to WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Active Thanks for your interest in the project. This is probably the last notice you will receive. ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 02:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Outbreak Records (US), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 15:42, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This message may seem a little awkward. I just put tagged it because it is very short and fails to assert the importance of the subject. If the record label is notable, please just place hangon on the page and explain why. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 15:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I also tagged your article Outbreak Records (UK). -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 15:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

News Time

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

BetacommandBot 23:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

EMI and EMI Records
Re: your edit to the Stateside Records article, EMI is a record company. EMI Records is a record label owned by EMI. The article stated that Stateside was phased out in favour of the EMI Records label. Your edit directed the link to the EMI company article. So I reverted the edit so it links back to the EMI Records label. Steelbeard1 12:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Acquirecover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Acquirecover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 13:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Prior to policy - Sorry, ShakespeareFan00 14:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Acquirecover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Acquirecover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of 10 Kilo Records artists
I've nominated List of 10 Kilo Records artists, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that List of 10 Kilo Records artists satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of 10 Kilo Records artists and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of 10 Kilo Records artists during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- SteinbDJ · talk · contributions 18:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Internet Top 100 Games List
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Internet Top 100 Games List, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Internet Top 100 Games List is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Internet Top 100 Games List, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 22:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of A&D Records
A&D Records, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that A&D Records satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/A&D Records and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of A&D Records during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 17:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles
Your user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Polyvinyl Record Co.
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Polyvinyl Record Co., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Polyvinyl Record Co.. Zytsef (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Porpoise Records
Another editor has added the  template to the article Porpoise Records, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Borae' Records
Another editor has added the  template to the article Borae' Records, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Experiment (game)
Could you please copyedit Experiment (game) and also add some citations to make it notable? This will safeguard its deletion at a later date. Also, could you find a way to de-orphan it? Thanks! Kingturtle (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GNU/DOS
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article GNU/DOS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ham Pastrami (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

EMI (Records)
Hi, I'm curious as to why you changed EMI Records to EMI in several articles. Both article names exist, and the context refers to actual record releases, so the page about EMI as a record label rather than an organization seems appropriate. Even if there is a reason for changing the link, your edits also removed the word "records" from the articles, i.e. you did not replace EMI Records with EMI Records or EMI Records, just EMI. This impacts the flow of the text, and also makes the style of entries in a discography inconsistent. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 13:07, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Hill Billy Stew Records
A tag has been placed on Hill Billy Stew Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 05:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dr Jazz Records
I have nominated Dr Jazz Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dr Jazz Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 19:20, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 504 Records
An article that you have been involved in editing, 504 Records, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/504 Records. Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created: 504 Records  may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/504 Records .

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted Findsources3:
 * Find sources for 504 Records : google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
 * 1) List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
 * 3) When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
 * 4) You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 03:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Aco Records
You appear to be one of the major contributors of this article. Could you please add your sources to this entry? It would save people a lot of time from discussing this on AFD. - Mgm|(talk) 10:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

The Hummingbirds
In a recent edit to this article you added Warner Bros Records as one of their labels - can you identify which of their records was released on that lable as I haven't been able to track down anything. Dan arndt (talk) 01:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Illegal Records
I have nominated Illegal Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Illegal Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ride Records
Hello Warpozio, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Ride Records, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Vegaswikian. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Vegaswikian. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 07:53, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Agitprop! Records
I have nominated Agitprop! Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Agitprop! Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sceptre (talk) 21:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:SST.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SST.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tommy Gospel Records
A tag has been placed on Tommy Gospel Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 21:06, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luke Records


The article Luke Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of inheritance through founding person and bands that may or may not be signed.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruthless Records (Chicago)
A tag has been placed on Ruthless Records (Chicago) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 16:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruthless Records (Chicago)


The article Ruthless Records (Chicago) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of inheritance through founding person and associated bands.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 07:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Celtic Heartbeat Records
A tag has been placed on Celtic Heartbeat Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 07:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Noise Records (UK)
A tag has been placed on Noise Records (UK) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 07:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hokey Pokey Records
A tag has been placed on Hokey Pokey Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 14:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jasmine Records
A tag has been placed on Jasmine Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Duck Records


The article Duck Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * '''Cant' find any sources that this is a notable company, only two band articles link to this Enrico Rava and Nicola Di Bari plus National Philharmonic Orchestra

Eric Clapton's discography does not make mention of it.

So given the lack of sources fails WP:CORP and without any ref to support Eric Clapton's connection don't feel like it should be a re-direct either.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nitto Records
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nitto Records, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Profile Records for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Profile Records, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Profile Records until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Experiment (game)


The article Experiment (game) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article does not assert the game's notability, is mildly advert-style and a check for WP:RS found next to nothing that was independent of the source. (Except this article, and clones of it on other sites.)  A further check for games & toys awards reveals mostly links to this page again.  I think it would be a WP:SNOW delete result in AfD, so I figured I'd save the time and effort.  That said - if you think it can be improved, or can find some refs, please feel free.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Addionne (talk) 21:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Warner Bros. Records
In relation to a number of your recent edits, please note that in music infoboxes the word Records should not be included, but should be pipe linked instead. Please see Template:Infobox_musical_artist/doc, Template:Infobox album/doc and Template:Infobox single/doc. Thanks! Mhiji (talk) 21:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark Five Records


A tag has been placed on Mark Five Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 11:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lotrbox.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lotrbox.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ramp Records


The article Ramp Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article has been unsourced since November 2010, makes no claims to notability, and looks similar to a dab page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ArcAngel    (talk) ) 20:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pye Golden Guinea Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pye Golden Guinea Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pye Golden Guinea Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. 78.26 (talk) 03:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Loaded Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loaded Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Loaded Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of F-Beat Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article F-Beat Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/F-Beat Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:46, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ensign Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ensign Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ensign Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMesquito buzz  01:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Junior Boy's Own


A tag has been placed on Junior Boy's Own requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Revolution Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Revolution Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Keithbob • Talk  • 16:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Go! Beat Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Go! Beat Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Go! Beat Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

re: The Hit & Run Album
Thanks - good spot. I'll rework the lead, not sure how the page should be titled with various MOS issues! Thanks again.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 18:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Updated and logged a requested move.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 18:42, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Beatles discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Odeon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Harlekijn for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harlekijn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harlekijn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Editør (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oui can luv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The McCartney Interview, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Minit Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Minit Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Minit Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 11:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Priority Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priority Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Priority Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- HighKing ++ 12:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:High quality Warner Bros.-Seven Arts logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:High quality Warner Bros.-Seven Arts logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hamilton Records


A tag has been placed on Hamilton Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sacred Records


A tag has been placed on Sacred Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hamilton Records


The article Hamilton Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable label, no sourcing found"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:07, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Epitonic Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epitonic Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Epitonic Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rejoice Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rejoice Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rejoice Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pariah24 (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Record Label notability criteria
Hello Warpozio -

I remember seeing your name come up long ago as a creator of hundreds of record label articles, so I thought you might be interested in the discussion going on about establishing a set of guidelines for determining a label's notability. Feel free to visit and comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Chubbles (talk) 18:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Asylum Records HQ logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Asylum Records HQ logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Data Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Data Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King And God 13:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of In Records (United States)


A tag has been placed on In Records (United States) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ GB fan 16:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Island Blue Records


A tag has been placed on Island Blue Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ GB fan 16:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Culburnie Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Culburnie Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Culburnie Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 12:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Junior Boy's Own for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junior Boy's Own is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Junior Boy's Own until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 12:22, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Telegraph Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Telegraph Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Telegraph Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Colortone Records


The article Colortone Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Record label with no claim of notability, failing WP:GNG; no evidence of significant coverage"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 02:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Cooltempo Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cooltempo Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cooltempo Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  HighKing++ 13:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sunset Records


The article Sunset Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no evidence of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sunset Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunset Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sunset Records& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zebra Records


A tag has been placed on Zebra Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Atlantic306 (talk) 00:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hip Records


The article Hip Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable minor record label that is now defunct. Tagged since 2009"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hip Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hip Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hip Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bellmark Records


The article Bellmark Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bellmark Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bellmark Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bellmark Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Warner Bros.-Seven Arts


The article Warner Bros.-Seven Arts has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "All sources are primary, the article needs 50 or more references for notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 00:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eternal Records


The article Eternal Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable imprint of Warner Bros, has been unsourced since 2009."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:18, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Deadsy (album)
 * added a link pointing to WEA
 * Hollywood Beyond
 * added a link pointing to WEA
 * John Boyden
 * added a link pointing to WEA
 * Julia Messenger
 * added a link pointing to WEA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Celtophile Records


The article Celtophile Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable record label."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib (talk) 07:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of ABKCO Records.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of ABKCO Records.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Exodus Records


The article Exodus Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Stub since it's creation. Found no reliable coverage or information with which the article could expand. No appearance of notability. Not mentioned at Vee-Jay Records so not much point in redirecting."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 10:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tiara Records


The article Tiara Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced since > 10 years"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Esquire Records


The article Esquire Records has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InDimensional (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)