User talk:WarthogDemon/Archive/Archive 22

Common Sense
I'm glad you reverted my comment about common sense. It was a little cynical. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oilstone (talk • contribs) 19:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Bluewater Bay
Obviously I'm new at this. The ownership issue is a big thorn for current owners. Herdon was part of the investment group but is no longer part of the group. There was litigation involved. The intention is to remove anyone's name as a "founder" of the resort as all feel they were involved and that Herdon is a self promoter. The other issues - soccer fields beaches and even middle school attended are accurate and current. Bwbmarketing (talk) 20:28, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Typo fixing
Oh, it's quite alright. I actually saw that myself, but I was too busy to fix it. Thanks, RyRy  ( talk ) 21:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

CCWWuss
I would not consider CCWWuss's edits to be vandalism. They may be misguided, but I do not believe they are an attempt to vandalize articles. Best, Gwernol 21:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  21:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

User:JeanLatore's subpages
Looks good to me. I've deleted them as G6 because the user has no more rights to them, and therefore they are just wasted space. Admins can restore if thre's a good reason. Thanks for the heads-up. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 23:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Alex Kuo
He won an American Book Award, three National Endowment for the Arts awards, and many others. Definitely meets notability criteria. But thanks for asking. DS (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  17:55, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Finnish gunboat Klas Horn
The ship article is titled as such because it is referring to the ship, not the admiral. Aldis90 (talk) 00:43, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Student Doctor Network
Organization should meet notable criteria under "Non-commercial organizations" - it is national, has over 30,000 active members, over 100 active volunteers, has been in existence 9 years, and has published 4 books which are commercially available. Thanks for consideration. Thamangas (talk) 20:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Pawan Kalyan
Hi. I can keep an eye on the page, but I don't know what his actual date of birth is. The IMDB says 1971, and in his first movie Akkada Abbai Ikkada Ammayi it doesn't seem like he would be only 13 years old.... Do you know of any reliable sources that can pin down his age? ... disco spinster   talk  00:02, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Reverting my comment
I think you overstepped your bounds when reverting my contribution to the discussion. Was I being a bit harsh, maybe. I never intended to be uncivil. Perhaps in the future you could just leave a warning without reverting unless the comment is a blatant attack against another editor. Allthedamnnamesaretaken (talk) 17:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)O

Comment from 99.1.96.225
omg why can't i edit your page 99.1.96.225 (talk) 03:19, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * cuz it's protected dude. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Ditto Gogo Dodo. - Warthog Demon  01:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Wow
Re: your message: I couldn't resist responding. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. =) LTNS! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Pokemon unmerge proposal
Hello, this message is being sent to inform you that a proposal to un-merge all Pokemon articles has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pokemon. As a member of WikiProject Pokemon, your input would be much appreciated. Glass  Cobra  22:49, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  05:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Guestbook!
Take a look at your guestbook; I wrote something there in late September. I hope you reply! Blue Danube (talk) 15:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Bump! Blue Danube (talk) 00:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up but...
What is it you think this IP did at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marist_College_Kogarah? (58.107.139.100 (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC))
 * A ridiculously late reply here: . - Warthog Demon  05:52, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Innosensebandmembers.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading Image:Innosensebandmembers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 01:44, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

AFD
Looks fine now. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey!
Long time, no see! Thanks for reformatting that comment. Glad to see that you are still around. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  06:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Re your message: I know what you mean by this place pulling you back in. I disappeared for offline reasons for large chunks of December through February, but I never really quite disappeared.  Actually, it was kind of a nice distraction if you can believe that. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Moderationmaker
It doesn't seem to be particularly serious, but you probably want to tag their talk page with uw-username and see if they'd like to have a name change.  bibliomaniac 1  5  19:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  01:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Green faith ministry
Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism. For example, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism. isnt there a rule against denying (religion) the first amendment here? i feel u are vandalizing cannabis religions! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reverend 420 (talk • contribs)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  18:58, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * what do you want it's donation reciepts, state licenses, state issued medical marijuan licenses, it is listed on all the other cannabis churches pages here. It is on the ULC directory. It is even on the business listings localy. Do you need their wedding officiant documents, marraige licenses, and death certificates they officiated over. If this is a state and federal recognized religion, HOW CAN YOU DENY THEM A PAGE? LINKS TO WERE YOU CAN GET ALL THIS IS PROVIDED! WHAT ELSE DO YOU NEED? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reverend 420 (talk • contribs) 19:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here . - Warthog Demon  19:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * marijuana medicine / religion, legalization dominates all government opinion web sites, polls, and views. Wake up you PERSECUTING/predjudice ENCYCLOPEDIA, THE CANNABIS REVOLUTION IS HERE TO STAY AND green faith ministry is a viable life line to this movement as all other belivers to all other religions, organizations, websites, Internet guides. Wikipedia articles should not exist only to describe the nature, appearance or services a website offers, but should describe the site in an encyclopedic manner, offering detail on a website's achievements, impact or historical significance, which can be significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources since we can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known. See current events for examples. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reverend 420 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Le Lavachet
what was wrong with le lavachet >??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavachet (talk • contribs) 23:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  00:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

YES!!!
Oh, man, what a rush it is to see you again! Welcome back! Yes, I broke down and asked for the admin tools back and I got them with no problem. I've been getting oh such fun nonsense on my talk page as a result. You may have noticed that last batch. :) Welcome, welcome, welcome!!!!!  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  00:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice to see you too. Somehow or other in recent days, I even managed to earn the right to issue rollback rights.  Don't know how, but I'll take it.  :)  I gave the rights to a couple of NP patrollers who really could have used them.  Things are going real good in the ol' personal life as well, knock on wood.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

WALKING FLOOR
You reverted my rewrite of the WALKING FLOOR® article, which I expected, and called it spam, which I did not expect (if you had read it you would have realized that it was accurate, and that the article you reverted it to is a misuse of our trademark), and then called me a spammer, which hurt my feelings.

Anyway, I have since followed the suggested procedures for correcting copyright violations: posted on the article's discussion page and sent an email to info-en-c@wikimedia.org to try to get this resolved.

Two options would suit us fine: change the name of the article from "Walking floor" to "moving floor", or delete the article altogether. We did not create the article.

If you can help make this happen, please do.

Thank you,

Egrutz (talk) 20:53, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Well, the article got renamed, but the deletion of the content wasn't such a good idea. The above user should have followed procedure instead of plastering their trademark notice on the article.  I suspect that the use of the trademark in the article name would fall under a fair use clause as if there were not, we wouldn't have articles like Macy's (see WP:MOSTM_.  If you want to check for sure, I would suggest asking at Copyright problems as a start.  That isn't the best place, but probably a good starting point. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:40, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Re Yeah, but I bet in the Macy's article, the term "Macy's" isn't being used as a generic term for all department stores. I'm sorry I didn't follow procedure. We are happy with the results. Thank you. -Egrutz (talk) 14:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the save
Regarding the vandalism on my page. Its amazing how much free time some people like Colorwolf and his kind have to waste on such trivialties.Zhanzhao (talk) 03:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  04:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Deleting Information
Please stop deleting information that is from a Jewish company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocoa bunne (talk • contribs) 05:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  05:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Have I Gone Insane?
Hello. No, I don't think you have anything to worry about. I saw that General Trees had been removed from the list, which was fine as there was no article at the time, but then I thought I'd check to see if there was enough around to create a fresh article on him, and there was, so I created one, and added him back into the list. --Michig (talk) 12:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Losing Sun
Re your message: I deleted all of it articles as they did not satisfy the music notability guidelines. No claim of a charted single or album and the band members were not notable. The only weak, unsourced claim was the connection to David Prowse, but that link does not establish notability. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Tom.jer007
Re your message: Done. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  19:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Re your message: I see you left a warning and then they blanked it. Let's see if he gets the picture.  If not, I'll block that account along with the IP. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Replied here: . - Warthog Demon  17:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Re your message: Accounts have been blocked and the IP blocked for a week. Maybe now they will get the idea. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Seth_C._N._Vidyalya
I have forwarded your request to Requests for oversight (I, like most administrators, do not have the technical ability to permanently expunge personal data from an article). In the future you may wish to simply send requests of this type directly to this request page. --Allen3 talk 21:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Spamming Is Allowed?
Re your message: Now... not... it's awl the sane word, write? -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2009 (UTC)