User talk:Wasell/Archives/2011

Popups
Have you got that working now or would you like a hand? :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The popups are working fine now. Thanks for asking!  Wasell ( T ) 05:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Great :). All the best, - Kingpin13 (talk) 05:19, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Post to Goldstone Report article
Hi, Wassell. I have the page watchlisted, so I noticed your (temporary) restoration of content that had originally been added to United Nations Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict by user Owain the 1st, and understood your reason for the self-revert. I do think the existing passage in the "Other" section about Finkelstein's view could reasonably be expanded, based on the text Owain wrote, and would encourage you to consider doing so, i.e. integrating the info he provided into the pre-existing content, to expand it a bit. Perhaps Owain might like to help, or at least have a look at the finished result, if you go ahead with that. Cheers, –  OhioStandard  (talk) 04:47, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

wassell why are you deleting information that's right! ??? how strang you are?

Your rollback request
Hello Wasell, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert anything else (such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with) can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning, depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, then don't use rollback and instead, use a manual edit summary. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 10:18, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

keep
Are you familiar with WP:POLITICIAN?

I called for a speedy keep due to Hazrat Ali's election to Afghanistan's Wolesi Jirga, its national assembly. The usual interpretation of WP:POLITICIAN is that politicians at the national or provincial level -- Presidents and their cabinets, Governors and their cabinet members, and legislators, are considered notable, per se, so long as their having held office can be documented.

Among your choices are to withdraw this nomination. If we had worked together, and I thought you trusted my advice, I would advise you to withdraw the nomination.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Some tags require an accompanying talk page explanation
You added the following tags to Inayat Khan: Did you notice that, when instantiated, both the POV tag and the tone tag tell readers to look on the talk page for a fuller explanation of the concern that prompted the placement of these tags?
 * POV
 * puffery
 * tone

Were you planning to draft a fuller explanation?

Personally, I think the explanation of the placement of the pov tag is the most important. How, after all, are any of the rest of us to know if subsequent changes have satisfied your concerns, if you aren't explicit as to what your concerns are? The potential exists that good faith contributors will try to address your concerns by excising all trace of a bias in one direction when you really thought the article was biased in the other direction. Geo Swan (talk) 22:38, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

"Night of the Comet."
Hello, just a quick note. I've reverted your edit to "Night of the Comet." The page was made as an episode of "The Vampire Diaries" and thus should be redirected there. Jayy008 (talk) 14:25, 3 December 2011 (UTC)