User talk:Wasif Daud Khan

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality (November 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Concepts_and_Innovation_in_Hospitality Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amkgp&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Concepts_and_Innovation_in_Hospitality reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Amkgp 💬  19:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Norms, Belief, Culture and Economics
NORMS, BELIEFS AND CULTURE EXPLAIN OUR ECONOMIC PAST Cultural status and personal preferences are often viewed in economic research as strong external dynamics where conclusions do not support analysis. In contrast, other social sciences, such as anthropology, sociology, and psychology, work on the basis that their environment will grow and be influenced by human cultures and choices. Over the past decade, economists such as (Guiso, 2006) have talked about the relationship between culture, beliefs, interests and economics, focusing on the unintended consequences of culture on the economy. They have shown, for example, that the level of trust that people have in the institutions of their country and other people affects many sectors of the economy (such as international trade). Similarly, the models proposed by (Verdier, 2010) where the transformation and legacy of cultural symbols are related to personal preferences and resources. The decision to transfer a cultural heritage is an agreement between interests, costs, and access to information. In this regard, the impact of economic activity and social programs on the strengths of interests, values and beliefs can be assessed. The cultural transfer is therefore considered to be the result of the interaction between family social decisions, and other forms of communication, such as social imitation. When parents' values are in harmony with the community's standards, they are more likely to trust the environment and spend less time educating their children. The posting comes first. Therefore, in times of economic change or shock, when global land prices fluctuate, it can affect family values. One of the most controversial social science issues is the conflict between two lines of thought that go hand in hand with Adam Smith and Emile Durkheim, between homo economic and homo sociological. In this case, the past should be directed to the order of the metal, while social norms determine the latter's behaviour. The former is "drawn" in the hope of gaining future rewards, and the last is "pushed" behind by weaker forces(Furlong, 2004). The former changing circumstances, always seeking to improve. Lastly, it doesn't care about the situation; it sticks to the price set even if new and better alternatives are found. The first is easily portrayed as an independent, asocial atom, and the last is an absurd toy for social forces. (Olivier, 2014)fully articulate these differences and discuss economic efforts to reduce the tendency to become accustomed to a particular behaviour type. Logical action is about consequences. The order is this: If you want to earn Y, make X. On the contrary, I define social norms with an unexplained aspect of the outcome. Simple social norms are of the type: Make an X, or: Do not make an X. Complex method are: If you do Y, then X, or: If others do Y, X says: Make X if it would be good if everyone did X. The order is conditional and is based on future. Social norms affect almost every aspect of human life and can be a barrier to economic development. This paper explains what social norms are and how they work, provides examples of daily life and studies of development cases. Sometimes there is not much that can be done about changing popular social norms. In those cases, development economists need to know how the existence of these practices could affect the outcomes of the policies they promote. But most important economic development (Eriksson, 2015)manners by which accepted practices can be changed, in any event under certain conditions. Comprehension of accepted practice change is inconsistent, best case scenario; however, the paper diagrams the hypothetical underpinnings of progress, with observational proof from different approaches pointed toward changing accepted practices. In any case, a portion of those arrangements raises moral worries that would require consideration. Accepted practices are either unqualified or, if restrictive, are not future arranged. For standards to be social, they should be shared by others and halfway supported by their endorsement and disapproval. They are additionally supported by the sensations of humiliation, nervousness, blame and disgrace that an individual endures at the possibility of abusing them. An individual complying with a standard may likewise be pushed by sure feelings, similar to outrage and resentment. Djilas (1958, p. 107) alludes to the sensation of an individual sanctioning the standards of retaliation in Montenegro as "the most out of control, best sort of tipsiness." Social standards have a grasp on the psyche that is because of the forceful feelings they can trigger. This underlying articulation to some degree misrepresents the mechanical, unreflective character of standard guided conduct. Normal practices offer significant extension for ability, decision, translation and control. Hence, objective entertainers regularly send standards to accomplish their finishes. However, there are cutoff points to the adaptability of standards; there would be nothing to control in any case. Consolidating specialists' defective information on the conveyance of inclinations opens up to examination a few new inquiries. The first is social therapists' act of "standards-based intercessions", to be specific missions and messages that look to adjust individuals' view of what establishes "typical" conduct or qualities among their friends. The model of (Tirole, 2011)clarifies how such mediations work and how their viability is restricted by a believability issue, especially when the graphic and prescriptive standards strife.As mentioned by(Konrad, pp. 13-16), Ongoing many years have seen practically exceptional monetary development in pay per capita worldwide. However, this unprecedented by and large execution veils a wide variety in development rates across various nations, with determined underdevelopment in certain pieces of the world. In this volume, financial specialists address imbalance and development issues, going past barely characterized "monetary" variables to think about the impact on the development of the structure of administration, the nature of a nation's administering bodies, and the normal practices that oversee aggregate dynamic. The patrons utilize both conventional displaying and exact investigations to analyze how the "delicate components" of organizations and standards communicate with development execution, normal asset blessings, and monetary execution. The presence of a state religion is emphatically identified with strictness, as per (McCleary, 2003), which means that it is possible by looking at the power that propagates religions' formation in those nations. In addition, tensions are diminished by the prevailing religious hierarchy and strong anti-Communist persecution. The most prominent of the various religions - namely, the strongest masses - are related to the higher church's participation and the strongest foundations. (McCleary, 2003)suggested that strong firm belief measures stimulate development because they help support individual behavioural components that enhance profitability. They acknowledge that a higher church's participation undermines development because it implies the most significant religious property use. However, such secrecy of development reduces the level at which church participation encourages strong beliefs that are more significant, enabling financial development. Strict sentencing was a factor in developing a free business, but Weber is not a monocausal expert. Proposing a temporary balance between the many factors that have led to the growth of capitalism. Explains the work of firm belief while (Marx, 1858) presents the work of various things, for example, class and nature. Financial institutions, in this way, are integrated with the value of society. Weber is less concerned with clarity as to why he is so committed to understanding the importance of social work, its seriousness to the entertainment industry itself, and the public entertainer's universal sensitivity. He does not say that Protestantism created capitalism. He focused on the practices in which Protestantism has influenced Capitalism or the things it can define, at the end of the day, the love between them ("love of choice") and how the two miracles work together. It does not mean that capitalism would not have developed without Protestantism, it would probably have been in another building (as was the case earlier because of Florentine merchants). One could say that Protestantism "formed" capitalism. It is anything but difficult to excuse this as an erratic model in that district was; we did not go up against with a scope of financial exchanges and circumstances where convictions and insights have an immediate and amazing effect on our choices. Analysts, sociologists and political researchers have perceived, for long, the significance of convictions in forming human conduct. Investigations from brain research demonstrate that individuals have deliberate inclinations. For instance, bettors' meetings at a circuit demonstrate that somebody simply leaving the wagering window puts down a lot higher wagers on a pony than somebody in the line only before putting down a wager. Acquiring from these social request fields, conduct financial analysts have attempted to set an elective clarification of monetary conduct to view a "heuristics and predispositions" way to deal with clarifying monetary choices. Another flood of monetary writing, which falls someplace in the middle of the standard model of discerning financial specialists and the heuristics and inclinations approach of conduct financial aspects, is by all accounts picking up noticeable quality at this point. This methodology has been dedicated as "spurred convictions" to underscore the joint impact of both thinking and predispositions in settling on financial choices. Conclusion: The hypothesis of persuaded convictions falls in the middle of these conceivable outcomes (of sound specialists and one-sided specialists). In these contentions, individuals are not carefully objective or deliberate chiefs, but rather their dynamic includes worked in defects. All things being equal, individuals have various objectives, which remember fitting for with their social gathering, feeling good, capable, and alluring, and accomplishing higher societal position". "The significant point is that the way toward the social event and handling data can deliberately leave from acknowledged normal guidelines since one objective—want to convince, concurrence with a companion gathering, mental self-portrait, self-protection—can appropriate consideration and guide thinking to the detriment of precision. Financial analysts are very much aware of jamming out impacts in business sectors. For therapists, persuaded thinking speaks to an illustration of jamming out in consideration." Access data about what others do. As accepted practices are halfway founded on the desires and convictions about what others do, this is significant. This can be fortified by broad promoting standards, through banners, flyers, and ads in papers, magazines and TV. Nonetheless, there may be a danger of a reaction from expanded exposure to standard infringement. Understanding people's opinion. Despite the fact that it is uncommon that people would communicate their considerations in word and conduct to policymakers, this data can be useful to distinguish instances of pluralistic obliviousness. They are using a prevalent difficulty. Authorizations maintain accepted practices, and weight from a person's gathering or network can support great and awful standards. It could be conceivable to fortify this approval framework through other direct methods, for example, expanding the exposure of accepted practices infringement(Eriksson, 2015). Social factors are consolidated into a benchmark endogenous financial development model. Social mentalities toward accomplishment and frugality positively affect financial development. Social perspectives concerning post realism negatively affect monetary development. Portraying globalization stays an intricate errand. It is the intelligent co-development of millions of mechanical, social, financial, social and natural patterns at all possible spatial-fleeting scales. Despite the proceeding with debate encompassing the specific powers and the recorded way that created globalization, we have demonstrated that it is conceivable to quantify globalization utilizing files. Until now, market analysts have been reluctant to rely on culture as a potential indicator of financial miracles. As pointed out by (Guiso, 2006), Many of these doubts stem from the very speculation of culture: it is too broad, and the channels through which it can enter into financial discourse are so widespread (and suspicious) that it is difficult to plan for the uninitiated, contradictory speculation. More recently, however, better strategies and more details have made it easier to identify functional differences in individual tendencies and beliefs and link them to different public heritage levels. These developments recommend a way to address and bring social clarity to the financial issues that can be tested and greatly improve our understanding of money wonders.

References •	Konrad, M. G. a. K. A., 2007. Institutions and Norms in Economic Development. CESifo, pp. 13-16. •	Tirole, R. B. &. J., 2011. Laws and Norms. National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 05-09. •	Eriksson, L., 2015. Social Norms Theory and Development Economics. World Bank, Washington, DC, pp. 10-11. •	Olivier, J., 2014. Culture and the economy: understanding the dynamics of globalization. HEC France, pp. 05-05. •	Furlong, D., 2004. THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF ’TRUST’ IN ECONOMIC THOUGHT. JSTOR, pp. 23-26. •	Verdier, T., 2010. The Economics of Cultural Transmission and Socialization. NBER Working Paper No. w16512, pp. 24-29. •	Guiso, L. P. S. a. L. Z., 2006. Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, pp. 23-48. •	McCleary, R. B. a. R., 2003. Religion and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 9682), pp. 13-14. •	Marx, K., 1858. Communist Manifesto, Theories & Beliefs. s.l.:s.n. •	Guiso, L., 2006. Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, pp. 02-03.

Concern regarding Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality
Hello, Wasif Daud Khan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality (April 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Concepts_and_Innovation_in_Hospitality Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Concepts_and_Innovation_in_Hospitality reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 11:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality


Hello, Wasif Daud Khan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Concepts and Innovation in Hospitality".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)