User talk:Wasifwasif/Archive 4

CfD
Did you even check the discussion, why did you revert it? The discussion can be found here .-sarvajna (talk) 15:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Will see to it. Wasif (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Despite my bitter words you responded softy,i was thinking that fighting for silly things is not an option,Sorry for that.You may proceed and do your work and if need arises i will discuss calmly.Thanx ---zeeyanwiki discutez 03:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melakkal Kanavai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thirumangalam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Rectified. Thanks Wasif (talk) 13:35, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Melakkal Kanavai
Please don't readd your sections about living people to Melakkal Kanavai. WP:BLP requires good sourcing for information regarding living people, especially when it is negative. Fram (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Please follow this in the talk page of the article.Wasif (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mattuthavani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KSRTC and SETC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello Wasif
Warning! Your recent edit on Syed Noor Zaman Naqshbandi Shazli has been reverted. No reason was given, possible vandelism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faizanhb2 (talk • contribs) 15:49, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Replied in the talk page. Calling Good faith edit a vandalism is an offence in WP. Wasif (talk) 15:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on Tags & edits
Hi, Wasif. I saw you editited this article Syed Noor Zaman Naqshbandi Shazli with bunch of tags. This article is going under a major EDIT. So, please remove those tags from there. I have NOT finished editiging it. I am in the process of gathering more book refrences and correcting the article to make it even better. If you find something that needs to be edited, Please first discuss on the talk page. Instead of posting it in the article directly. So, Please I request you not to revert my edits on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faizanhb2 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mattuthavani, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KSRTC and SETC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Moving of Sheikh Fassy article
While you are correct in that honorifics should be in the name if they are in common use, the common name of the subject at Imam Fassi doesn't seem to include Imam. If we look at the given sources for the article: here, here and here, for example, the term isn't being used. Perhaps we can open it for a community RFC by which we can trudge the Net for more sources to be sure, but so far I haven't been able to find many referring to him with the simple title "Imam Fassi." I obviously can't rule it out as being the common name myself, I'm just saying that I haven't found many instances. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, Thanks for bringing to my notice. Going by the sources i suggest Sheikh Fassi would be appropriate common name to have that article. Wasif (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, I was sick. Perhaps we could put the sources on the article's talk page and take a look. I have to admit I am not familiar with the figure, those sources are just what I found so far. Still, I'd like it if we could take a deeper look to be sure. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Take care of your health. Thanks. I am familiar enough and lets go by the sources. Wasif (talk) 06:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Use Indian English tag
Regarding your questions on my talk page, you can look at the User:Ohconfucius/EngvarB script page which describes a tool to assist with spelling maintenance. Indian subjects will be close to UK English, so conforming spellings to "EngvarB" should suffice in most cases. There will be occasional terminology differences which cannot be sufficiently handled by an automated script, therefore some manual copyediting will still be needed. As for when the "need arises" to convert, there is no official rule and there is no deadline, although some general principles are found in WP:ENGVAR. Clean up can be done when you find an article has gone astray with spellings or wordings. Note that Use Indian English is not a request to clean up the articles, it is a marker which will remain with the article to assist other editors as to what conventions should apply. Hope this helps. Dl2000 (talk) 01:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580732745 your edit] to List of Sufi saints may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * | Mir Shujauddin Qadri

November 2013
Please will you participate in a discussion at Talk:Muawiyah I. It is about a deletion you made.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:57, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islam in Sri Lanka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

1998 Coimbatore bombings
Hi, any reason why referenced edits are removed - what is POV here? You can mark parts that are contentious, but not a revert as the previous version was a copy from some websites.Ssriram mt (talk) 01:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Edits to 2002 Gujarat Violence
Hi, I noticed you edited the gujarat riots page recently. While I support your revert in the lede for the reasons given, I was wondering why you removed the quote from Modi about relief camps, without providing an explanation in the edit summary? It was sourced, to the Hindu. Was it a mistake? You also removed a link to the Godhra incident article. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:48, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Oldest Mosques
An area can only have one oldest mosque - that's what 'oldest' means. And any such claims need reliable sources by our criteria at WP:RS and can be removed if there are no such sources - anyone restoring them should restore them only with sources. There is also no "Mosque of Omar/Dome of the Rock". That's 2 mosques with separate articles. The whole article needs a lot of work. Dougweller (talk) 15:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * See the criteria given in the article itself:
 * To be listed here a site must:


 * be the oldest mosque in a country, large city (top 50), or oldest of its type (denomination, architectural, etc.);
 * be the oldest congregation of its type (denomination).

Dougweller (talk) 16:16, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madurai district, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Have replied in the Article's talk page. Please dont post anything here.

Reverted your edits.
I have reverted your edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saffron_terror&diff=602602502&oldid=602594079 Please discuss on the talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Saffron_terror

Jyoti (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Sufism does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)(Support ) 20:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Popular Front of India
I have undone your recent edits assuming good faith. There is a discussion about it on the talk page opened a week back. There were small incremental edits with descriptive edit summary over a week. Please do not blindly overwrite them. Several good improvements were lost in the bulk copy paste from much older revisions. Do specific editing at a time with descriptive edit summary. I have restored your POV tag on the article. Thank you. Jyoti (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that you had put back the edit that I had reverted on 03 April and request you to discuss on talk page (in above section 'Reverted your edits') when you over-wrote present version with an older revision of the article yesterday night. I would like to say again: do specific editing at a time with descriptive edit summary. Jyoti (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Popular Front of India
I have undone your recent edits assuming good faith. There is a discussion about it on the talk page opened a week back. There were small incremental edits with descriptive edit summary over a week. Please do not blindly overwrite them. Several good improvements were lost in the bulk copy paste from much older revisions. Do specific editing at a time with descriptive edit summary. I have restored your POV tag on the article. Thank you. Jyoti (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that you had put back the edit that I had reverted on 03 April and request you to discuss on talk page (in above section 'Reverted your edits') when you over-wrote present version with an older revision of the article yesterday night. I would like to say again: do specific editing at a time with descriptive edit summary. Jyoti (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Popular Front of India
I have undone your recent edits assuming good faith. There is a discussion about it on the talk page opened a week back. There were small incremental edits with descriptive edit summary over a week. Please do not blindly overwrite them. Several good improvements were lost in the bulk copy paste from much older revisions. Do specific editing at a time with descriptive edit summary. I have restored your POV tag on the article. Thank you. Jyoti (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that you had put back the edit that I had reverted on 03 April and request you to discuss on talk page (in above section 'Reverted your edits') when you over-wrote present version with an older revision of the article yesterday night. I would like to say again: do specific editing at a time with descriptive edit summary. Jyoti (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madurai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kazi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

POV?
please have the discussion in article talk page. not here. Wasif (talk) 15:11, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Yuvan Shankar Raja
Please do not add a quote to an article that is not in the source. And read WP:NOTVAND. --Neil N  talk to me 14:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * USer User:NeilN, STOP vandlaism of deleting the source itself. You will have to be reported.Wasif (talk) 15:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hi I have reverted your deletion of sort-keys in the 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots page. Please explain your rationale for edits in the summary lines. For more contentious issues, please open a discussion on the article talk page. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

February 2015
There were three problems with your edit to the article on Muawiyah I:
 * Quotations need to start and end with inverted commas. When you chopped the end off the quotation, you removed the final inverted commas.
 * You also changed "willing" into "will" in the following sentence: "When they returned to the lady and told her that they are willing to give its weight in silver..."; "willing" is correct English; "will" is not.
 * Some care is needed with removal of a statement by Mr Holland of his personal opinion. This needs to be discussed on the article's talk page.  I am not sure what the right answer is.--  Toddy1 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

RfC
As one of the largest active contributors to the 2002 Gujarat riots area, a vote here would be appreciated, in either direction. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 10:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Jaaron95. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tamil Nadu without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &dagger;&atilde;&atilde;&#114;&oslash;&#110;&#57;&#53; &reg; 16:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Erwadi dargah
I have created a new article and delinked from Erwadi. Plase don't chnage it again as it is posted now for DYK. I have not disturbed the Erwadi article at all and it will continue to be there. There is no need for redirection. Thanks.-- Nvvchar . 10:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Mass revert
Hello and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! Your recent unexplained mass revert of multiple edits at List of Sufi saints happened to undo, along with other edits, some rather straightforward but time-consuming work I'd put in to clean up the article in accordance with WP:MOS. I don't believe my edits could be construed as controversial and you didn't include an edit summary with your revert, so I assume your reversion of all the cleanup work was unintentional. In the future, to avoid creating extra work for other editors, please be extremely careful when reverting: revert only when necessary, examine the other editors' work carefully, only undo the specific edits that are problematic, and always provide a valid and informative explanation in your edit summary. Your fellow editors will appreciate it greatly! Thanks. AtticusX (talk) 06:51, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disruptive Editing
(WP:DE) Your 2015-05-20 edit to the Ishrat Jahan case removed references to source documents and introduced a misspelling. In the future, to avoid creating extra work for other editors, please be extremely careful when making changes: revert only when necessary, examine the other editors' work carefully, only undo the specific edits that are problematic, and always provide a valid and informative explanation in your edit summary. Thanks. ExVulgusScientia (talk) 18:53, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016
 Wikipedia Asian Month  Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history
You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Indian defence services
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)
Greetings,

It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution
In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
 * (a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
 * (b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.

If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.


 * Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
 * Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Project Tiger Writing Contest
In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.

Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:


 * Sign up at: Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
 * List of the articles can be referred at: Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
 * Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
 * For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Project Tiger Writing Contest

Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk •&#32;mail) at 22:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC).

Unexplained removal of referenced content from Mohammed al Fassi
Hello, I'm Esowteric. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mohammed al Fassi without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't remove content that has reliable, secondary citations without explanation. It may be more appropriate to first bring up any issues that you have, on the article's talk page. Regards,  Esowteric + Talk  15:20, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Tamil Muslim
Hi, if the IP repeatedly reinstating poor content at Tamil Muslim is you, or if you know who it is, please can you engage on the article talk page instead. If I am way off course here then my apologies. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:51, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Sitush. This is unnecessary a suspicion. I doubt why it shouldn't be you who does that through an IP. Wasif (talk) 18:07, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, like I said, my apologies if wrong. I know you have had long-term dealings with that and related subjects, not all of them happy, and just thought you might have some idea. - Sitush (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Your edit on Madurai
Hello! In your edit summary on Madurai, you state that "Hazrat when used as suffix... is not an honorific." This seems to contradict the main article at Hazrat, which does differentiate between Hazrat at the beginning or end of a name, but still states both are honorifics. Do you have a reference for the honorific vs. non-honorific use of the term? Happy editing! PohranicniStraze (talk) 22:20, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * sorry for late reply. In the context used in page Madurai, Hazrat in suffix is to notify that they are Islamic teachers. If you mean calling someone a teacher is honorific then it is. Generally Prefix Hazrat is honorific. I will share if i come across any reference meanwhile you can verify with native editors. Wasif (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject India
 WikiProject India

'Namaste'', Wasifwasif. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.'''  Subscribe

Newsletter discussion

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Shadhili hadra.JPG


The file File:Shadhili hadra.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, low quality"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Al-Fassi family for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Fassi family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Al-Fassi family until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 02:54, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of United Islamic Welfare Association


The article United Islamic Welfare Association has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NORG. A WP:BEFORE search in both English and Tamil finds no significant coverage in reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)