User talk:WaskaMaska

Diversicom
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Diversicom, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.diversicom.net/about_history.php.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Redneck Techs: notability issue
Hi ! It's great to see you contributing new pages to the Wikipedia as you did to Redneck Techs. This article, however, might not  meet  our criteria for notability  for inclusion  in  the Wikipedia, and we have been unable to  find additional, third-party  sources that  establish  the subject's importance. If you can, please address these issues to avoid your efforts being deleted, and  please be sure to provide  reliable and verifiable sources. For more information. See also: WP:SOURCES, and WP:NOT. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 01:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Diversicom: notability issue
Hi ! It's great to see you contributing new pages to the Wikipedia as you did to Diversicom. This article, however, might not  meet  our criteria for notability  for inclusion  in  the Wikipedia, and we have been unable to  find additional, third-party  sources that  establish  the subject's importance. If you can, please address these issues to avoid your efforts being deleted, and  please be sure to provide  reliable and verifiable sources. For more information. See also: WP:SOURCES, and WP:NOT. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 01:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Diversicom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diversicom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diversicom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)