User talk:Wasp32

Reason for merging Leaf window
I just notice that you merged leaf window into fenestration a few months back. Fenestration (holes in leaf) is a fundamentally different concept then leaf/epidermal window, and other than their names' etymologies, their similarity ends. As you, stated in you merge edit, the articles didn't much overlap for this precise reason. Is there a good reason why you did this?

If not, I would like to unmerge the previous article and set up a disambiguation page. Using a merge notifications such as the "merge-to" template would have been good before you went ahead since this would have allowed for a quick discussion.-- Sjschen (talk) 03:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There was a merge template on the page before I merged. Also the introductory sentence of the fenestration:

Fenestration is a term in botany that refers either to natural holes or to translucent areas in the flowers or leaves of some species of plants.[1][2] Since the definition of fenestration includes leaf windows I thought it suitable to merge.03:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick reply. It would have been helpful to put a merge-to on the other page. Still, the term "Fenestration" is used in different context the two cited references. With the Cambridge glossary (2001) specifically indicating a translucent area in the leaf (epidermal window) and the Kew glossary referring to actual perforations (holes)in a leaf. This unfortunate and ambiguous use of the term inappropriately combines two functionally different leaf morphologies. If anything, the term "Fenestration" should be disambiguated(as a page or as a article heading) and the material for the two morphologies should have separate articles. -- Sjschen (talk) 19:55, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you wish to do that, by all means go ahead. I don't have a strong position on the matter.Wasp32 (talk) 01:52, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Great. Will do. -- Sjschen (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Flabellate


The article Flabellate has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * per WP:DICDEF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mduvekot (talk) 13:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Fatoua villosa
Hi, I'm Bennv3771. Wasp32, thanks for creating Fatoua villosa!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Would be helpful if you add some relevant categories.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Bennv3771 (talk) 05:36, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silybum marianum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)